• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Terrorists take over federal Building, threaten violence

How about we go to the federal land near Bundy's dad (site of the 2014 terrorism) and biuld a mosque. You know, "for the people".

- - - Updated - - -

Also, does anyone know of OTHER "protests" that involved armed B&E with threats to kill law enforcement where it ended "peacefully" and with no jail time for the perps?
 
So the whole thing is really just a quest on the part of these bogus "activists" after something for nothing...siezing wildlife reserves for mining, running cattle and logging....real men? These people deserve to be starved out of their positions then imprisoned for their threatening the rest of us with their guns. Tell grandma to send the birthday cards to Leavenworth. This is the most ignorant collection of yokels I have seen in a long time.

If one of them is 12 years old and has a toy gun, then the police can just shoot them all.

Wait.

Do any of them have hoodies? We can definitely shoot them if one of them has a hoodie.

Have any of them posted pictures of themselves on Facebook holding a gun?
 
This seems more analogous to the #Occupy movement.
Too forgotten. :)

I don't see any more of Dismal's post than what you have quoted above, but I actually agree with that sentence.

I think the Bundy's are idiots and their "cause" is bullshit, but the "occupation" of the federal building is not much different than Occupy Wall Street or Dreamers occupying government offices.

The fact that Bundy's bunch is openly and aggressively armed is quite different but technically legal...

The biggest difference is Bundy's bunch threatening gun violence, but even that they are clearly trying to walk back.

In short, I don't have a problem with the protest/occupation part of it, and disagree with all calls for violence against these people.

What I will be very interested to see, however, is if the Bundy bunch are pepper-sprayed, harassed, and arrested the way the OWS people were.
 
Too forgotten. :)

I don't see any more of Dismal's post than what you have quoted above, but I actually agree with that sentence.

I think the Bundy's are idiots and their "cause" is bullshit, but the "occupation" of the federal building is not much different than Occupy Wall Street or Dreamers occupying government offices.

The fact that Bundy's bunch is openly and aggressively armed is quite different but technically legal...

The biggest difference is Bundy's bunch threatening gun violence, but even that they are clearly trying to walk back.

In short, I don't have a problem with the protest/occupation part of it, and disagree with all calls for violence against these people.

What I will be very interested to see, however, is if the Bundy bunch are pepper-sprayed, harassed, and arrested the way the OWS people were.

And whether or not their library will be confiscat--

wait, who am I kidding--these people don't read books.
 
Well... the guns thing didn't happen, nor the "we came to die" attitude. Also, they were protesting something that really existed.

OK, #Occupy with more guns* and fewer drums.

Not exactly the same, but similar.

*Unless you count Occupy Oakland.

Yeah.

Occupy was to bring attention to things like growing inequality and shrinking opportunity. Things that effect most people.

This is to shield two crazies from doing their jail time after being convicted of crimes.

I can see how they look similar.
 
Also, they were protesting something that really existed.
What do you mean, something that really existed? The cause these idiots are protesting is much more concrete that vague goals of Occupy - i.e. they are protesting imprisonment of some members of the Bundy clan who set fires on federal land. I guess that is another similarity between these guys thugs and BLMers - they are both protesting on behalf of criminals. ;)

You forgot your preferred language so I FIFY
 
The Refuge was established in 1908 by Teddy Roosevelt for christ fucking sake. Now their getting around to reclaiming it for who?

This is funny shit and it's 13 degrees there. I hope they all get frostbite and need medical care.
I hope they freeze their balls off so they can't reproduce.
 
You forgot your preferred language so I FIFY
My New Year's resolution was to try to use words that increase your blood pressure less frequently RavenSky. You're welcome. ;)

Your resolution should have been "I will not bring up Black people and women unless it's relevant."
 
Too forgotten. :)

I don't see any more of Dismal's post than what you have quoted above, but I actually agree with that sentence.

I think the Bundy's are idiots and their "cause" is bullshit, but the "occupation" of the federal building is not much different than Occupy Wall Street or Dreamers occupying government offices.

The fact that Bundy's bunch is openly and aggressively armed is quite different but technically legal...

The biggest difference is Bundy's bunch threatening gun violence, but even that they are clearly trying to walk back.

In short, I don't have a problem with the protest/occupation part of it, and disagree with all calls for violence against these people.

What I will be very interested to see, however, is if the Bundy bunch are pepper-sprayed, harassed, and arrested the way the OWS people were.

My guess is all the guns will help them not get pepper-sprayed so much.
 
When they go out for snacks, someone should slip a pack of Skittles into the bag.

Or some Swisher Sweets. Because attacking civilians or cops is not what got them killed, but what they were carrying, right?

Some people think this is actually real:
8eb27e6723327061af6fb0981e1815b18f339bd384c270fbe30a2c82ad514d64.jpg

Although, this is probably true:
trayvon-meme-generator-skittles-salesman-of-the-year-18a5fc.jpg
 
Last edited:
The deadly weapons and death threats against government officials make all the difference, a difference that warrants use of deadly force against these ass-clowns, and life in prison for all those not killed.
BLM creeps are threatening police with deadly violence as well. Should people like "Eye Empress Kismet" from Georgia get life in prison (if not killed in raid to arrest her)? Or is she exempt because she is black and you agree with her?
Should these assclowns be shot on sight too?
 
The idiots shutting down the 4th precinct in Minneapolis (over that dead violent criminal if you remember, not much different than occupying a government building for incarcerated criminals) were also soliciting free food and firewood. What's the difference?
I don't agree with "Occupy Oregon" aims and goals but at least they have the good sense to occupy something out of the way. BLMers like to occupy/blockade busy malls, interstates, an airport, neighborhood police precincts (ans subject everyone living in the vicinity to noise and air pollution for weeks).

And they want you to send them via a US government post office!
Are you saying they are hypocritical for wanting to use a government resource? I guess you are right, but doesn't that also apply to "fuck da police", "pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon" chanting BLM activists wanting police to protect them when some of their own got shot?
 
When they go out for snacks, someone should slip a pack of Skittles into the bag.

Or some Swisher Sweets. Because attacking civilians or cops is not what got them killed, but what they were carrying, right?
Please stop messing up these threads with his unhealthy obsession of yours. You are free to start a new thread comparing Black Lives Matter to the refuge occupation.
 

They boasted that they are ready to stay there for years, but they've only made it for three days wrt food? :hysterical:

A bunch of clowns with guns wanting stuff for nothing :rolleyes:

To be fair, though, it was fairly obvious before they began that it would only take three days for the country to rise up in support of them, get Obama impeached, have a True Republican installed as President and officially proclaim them American heroes and put out a nationwide call to shower them with money and nubile women. Their only real problem this far after they started should be needing to sit still to pose for the statues being built of them.

Planning for longer than that would have just been wasteful.
 
They boasted that they are ready to stay there for years, but they've only made it for three days wrt food? :hysterical:

A bunch of clowns with guns wanting stuff for nothing :rolleyes:

To be fair, though, it was fairly obvious before they began that it would only take three days for the country to rise up in support of them, get Obama impeached, have a True Republican installed as President and officially proclaim them American heroes and put out a nationwide call to shower them with money and nubile women. Their only real problem this far after they started should be needing to sit still to pose for the statues being built of them.

Planning for longer than that would have just been wasteful.
I agree. Sounds like we're primarily dealing with a bunch of juvenile attention whores who have discovered social media. No doubt the local Andy-of-Mayberry types have figured that out and decided to not pick on their lesser brethren who pound their chests.
 
Back
Top Bottom