Jarhyn
Wizard
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 17,333
- Gender
- Androgyne; they/them
- Basic Beliefs
- Natural Philosophy, Game Theoretic Ethicist
It dodges the issue entirely.
No it doesn't dodge the issue entirely.
You do raise a good distinction point, and rather than telling steve its a ridiculous question, you could have skipped to making that distinction. You are right that there is less security concern if there are lockable doors in cubicles, and especially if those are fully enclosed and can't be looked into or jumped over or reached under (rare). But what of change rooms and showers? I frequent a number of places where those are gender all inclusive as well.
So, I answered the question (in the same way anyone else should), but my answer makes it obvious that it was a bad question.
Really, what he was trying to argue was that parents shouldn't be caught out for failing their obligation to explain genital differences to children. If children are old enough to notice a genital difference, they are old enough that a parent should have explained that all at least a year or two earlier (as if that would ever happen in the scenario of a trans person existing in a public restroom; it's not like my husband uses urinals, so it's unlikely any dudes are going to see his vag, and it's not as if women's rooms have urinals in them or as if transwomen are going to be walking around with their pants down outside the stalls...).
So the scenario and implications are ridiculous on the face of it all. Even IF a parent somehow is so inept that they do not explain the differences before it is an issue, and even IF the child sees the difference and asks the question, you should, as a competent parent, just explain it.