The Race For 2024

[Shadowy Man]

And responding with “sure, Jan” and rolling eyes just further cements the fact that you are uninterested in good faith discussion.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I post about it because the topic is "The Race For 2024" and Brandon's age related decline is very much part of the race and is on topic for discussion and entertainment. Brandon's decline is going to be monitored by most people and will feature heavily in the race.

This would be a lot easier to take seriously, if Nikki Haley was the presumptive nominee for the GOP.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

And responding with “sure, Jan” and rolling eyes just further cements the fact that you are uninterested in good faith discussion.

I'm uncertain the last time TSwizzle actually was part of a discussion here.

 

[Elixir]

And responding with “sure, Jan” and rolling eyes just further cements the fact that you are uninterested in good faith discussion.

I'm uncertain the last time TSwizzle actually was part of a discussion here.

Never occurred to y’all what the T stands for?

 

[TSwizzle]

I have to assume most on here are not going to vote Trump but the obsession with Trump on here really is totally unhinged but people like to talk about Trump (a lot!) but I don't see you losing you shit about that when Trump is brought up.

I could just as easily point to your posts and say you are “obsessed” with Biden’s age and gaffes.

Brandon's age and mental decline appears in the press far more than his policies so I guess I am not the only one "obsessed". But if I was really as obsessed as you seem to think I am, wouldn't I have started multiple posts, every day about it? No, I tend to stick to this particular post when I bring it up. And again, you are not obliged to read and respond to my posts.

If you don’t understand our concerns with Trump as a future President then we should discuss the issue rationally. But instead you seem to favor insults.

Yes but I don't complain about it every time Trump is brought up.

This is not about me and is off topic so this will be my last reply on the subject.

 

[Shadowy Man]

Ooft;

A new ad from Trump world questions whether Joe Biden, 81, will make it through a second term if he wins in November amid rising questions over the president's age and fitness for office. Clips of Biden tripping on stairs and freezing during public appearances are peppered in the 30-second ad, which aired Thursday morning during a commercial break for MSNBC's Morning Joe – of one of Biden's favorite shows.
The president's flubs and freezes have been on the rise and only highlighted more as the 2024 general election approaches in November. On Tuesday, Biden sparked more health concerns when he froze for 15 seconds during a press conference after saying: 'I have a lot of questions. I better not start the questions. I'll get in trouble.' 'We can all see Joe Biden's weakness,' the narrator for the MAGA Inc. ad notes after a 10-second clip of Biden's freezing during a separate press conference on February 16. 'If Biden wins, can he even survive til 2029?' the voice questions, adding: 'The real question is – can we?'

Daily Mail

When will the Dems bring this farce to an end?

{snip} Biden is the nominee. Get over it.

I know Brandon is the nominee. The question is really about whether this decrepit old geezer is fit enough (mentally and physically) to run for 2024 and actually serve the four year term. I think not.

Don’t be an unhinged crybaby about it.

I'm not being a "unhinged cry baby about it". Why would I even care? I ain't voting for the old duffer and I wouldn't vote for him if he was 61.

Sorry, I was just using language I thought you’d understand.

Oh how droll.

If you don’t care why do you constantly post about it?

You are not obliged to read and respond to my posts, you can always use the "ignore" feature.

Yes I could but that doesn’t answer my question. If you don’t care why do you continually post about it? Seems you have some interest in the issue. Is it just to stir us up? Own the libs?

I post about it because the topic is "The Race For 2024" and Brandon's age related decline is very much part of the race and is on topic for discussion and entertainment.

so you do understand that in a thread the posters might want to discuss the thread topic. So, on a thread about the recent Supreme Court decision you think that posting “NINE to zero!!! Scoreboard! Get over it!!!” Is an appropriate and useful response?

I might be able to take you seriously if I could somehow get through all the blatant, childish anti-intellectual

 

[Shadowy Man]

I have to assume most on here are not going to vote Trump but the obsession with Trump on here really is totally unhinged but people like to talk about Trump (a lot!) but I don't see you losing you shit about that when Trump is brought up.

I could just as easily point to your posts and say you are “obsessed” with Biden’s age and gaffes.

Brandon's age and mental decline appears in the press far more than his policies so I guess I am not the only one "obsessed".

I agree. The press is over-obsessed with his age and under reporting his accomplishments. Also, the press that harps on this is mostly the same that owe hundreds of millions of dollars in legal punishments for their incessant lying and political hackery. I’m not sure you should want to rejoice in such company.

But if I was really as obsessed as you seem to think I am, wouldn't I have started multiple posts, every day about it? No, I tend to stick to this particular post when I bring it up. And again, you are not obliged to read and respond to my posts.

If you don’t understand our concerns with Trump as a future President then we should discuss the issue rationally. But instead you seem to favor insults.

Yes but I don't complain about it every time Trump is brought up.

Trump Being brought up in a thread called “Race for 2024” seems reasonable to me.

 

[Elixir]

Brandon's age and mental decline appears in the press I SEE far more than his policies so I guess I am not the only one "obsessed".

FIFY
You and your RW media bubble are definitely obsessed. The truth is anathema to the GQP.

 

[ZiprHead]

Ooft;

A new ad from Trump world questions whether Joe Biden, 81, will make it through a second term if he wins in November amid rising questions over the president's age and fitness for office. Clips of Biden tripping on stairs and freezing during public appearances are peppered in the 30-second ad, which aired Thursday morning during a commercial break for MSNBC's Morning Joe – of one of Biden's favorite shows.
The president's flubs and freezes have been on the rise and only highlighted more as the 2024 general election approaches in November. On Tuesday, Biden sparked more health concerns when he froze for 15 seconds during a press conference after saying: 'I have a lot of questions. I better not start the questions. I'll get in trouble.' 'We can all see Joe Biden's weakness,' the narrator for the MAGA Inc. ad notes after a 10-second clip of Biden's freezing during a separate press conference on February 16. 'If Biden wins, can he even survive til 2029?' the voice questions, adding: 'The real question is – can we?'

Daily Mail

When will the Dems bring this farce to an end?

{snip} Biden is the nominee. Get over it.

I know Brandon is the nominee. The question is really about whether this decrepit old geezer is fit enough (mentally and physically) to run for 2024 and actually serve the four year term. I think not.

Don’t be an unhinged crybaby about it.

I'm not being a "unhinged cry baby about it". Why would I even care? I ain't voting for the old duffer and I wouldn't vote for him if he was 61.

Sounds to me like you're afraid Biden will win so you and the Republicans come up with bullshit. BAWK BAWK BAWK.

 

[ZiprHead]

Brandon's age and mental decline appears in the press far more than his policies so I guess I am not the only one "obsessed".

That clearly shows us what media sources you use for "information."

 

[TomC]

Brandon's age and mental decline appears in the press far more than his policies so I guess I am not the only one "obsessed".

Because the president's policies are working for America overall, so there's little to discuss if the goal is to improve American life.

It's like the 90s. Clinton was doing a great job at being POTUS. The peace and prosperity of this country was at all time highs. Deficits and federal debt were dropping. He was working on welfare reform and the war against crime. The best thing the Republicans could come up with was "He cheated on his wife!" Started the Impeachment Circus.

Frankly, were I married to Hillary I'd cheat to, and lie about it when sitting a few feet away from her in court.

But that's what we're dealing with here. Democrats elect president's that work for America. Republicans steal elections to work for the super rich. And Republicans will trash America in order to have something to blame the Democrats for at election time. They've been doing this for decades.
Tom

 

[Politesse]

Yes, I realize this is an idealistic stance incompatible with news media's major objective, which is to sell mayonnaise and make-up, and to do nothing that might cause the DJIA to decline.

You're going to sell a lot more mayonnaise pushing zinger political headlines to people who aren't wholly apathetic to politics. Parasocial relationships with notorious politicians are a key element of the election news to mayonnaise sales pipeline.

I hate mayonnaise.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Ooft;

A new ad from Trump world questions whether Joe Biden, 81, will make it through a second term if he wins in November amid rising questions over the president's age and fitness for office. Clips of Biden tripping on stairs and freezing during public appearances are peppered in the 30-second ad, which aired Thursday morning during a commercial break for MSNBC's Morning Joe – of one of Biden's favorite shows.
The president's flubs and freezes have been on the rise and only highlighted more as the 2024 general election approaches in November. On Tuesday, Biden sparked more health concerns when he froze for 15 seconds during a press conference after saying: 'I have a lot of questions. I better not start the questions. I'll get in trouble.' 'We can all see Joe Biden's weakness,' the narrator for the MAGA Inc. ad notes after a 10-second clip of Biden's freezing during a separate press conference on February 16. 'If Biden wins, can he even survive til 2029?' the voice questions, adding: 'The real question is – can we?'

Daily Mail

When will the Dems bring this farce to an end?

{snip} Biden is the nominee. Get over it.

I know Brandon is the nominee. The question is really about whether this decrepit old geezer is fit enough (mentally and physically) to run for 2024 and actually serve the four year term. I think not.

Don’t be an unhinged crybaby about it.

I'm not being a "unhinged cry baby about it". Why would I even care? I ain't voting for the old duffer and I wouldn't vote for him if he was 61.

Sorry, I was just using language I thought you’d understand.

Oh how droll.

If you don’t care why do you constantly post about it?

You are not obliged to read and respond to my posts, you can always use the "ignore" feature.

Yes I could but that doesn’t answer my question. If you don’t care why do you continually post about it? Seems you have some interest in the issue. Is it just to stir us up? Own the libs?

I post about it because the topic is "The Race For 2024" and Brandon's age related decline is very much part of the race and is on topic for discussion and entertainment.

so you do understand that in a thread the posters might want to discuss the thread topic. So, on a thread about the recent Supreme Court decision you think that posting “NINE to zero!!! Scoreboard! Get over it!!!” Is an appropriate and useful response?

I might be able to take you seriously if I could somehow get through all the blatant, childish anti-intellectual

I totally trolled you. Just look at the rolling eyes! You are pwned!

 

[Politesse]

And responding with “sure, Jan” and rolling eyes just further cements the fact that you are uninterested in good faith discussion.

I'm uncertain the last time TSwizzle actually was part of a discussion here.

Never occurred to y’all what the T stands for?

I... just assumed it was "transgendered". No?

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Now that SCOTUS, by a very partisan 9-0 vote, has cleared the way for Trump to be on the ballot, there is a chance he might steal enough electoral votes to get elected.

Who knew that Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson were all MAGA. But that's another topic.

If Trump does manages to scrounge and steal up to 270, what plans are in place to stop him then?

14th Amendment I suppose. But in all seriousness, your post is quite impossoble to take serious.

Also Bidren can just wipe Trump off the face of the Earth, Trump said so.

You don't take the possibility of a Trump victory seriously?

 

[Shadowy Man]

Now that SCOTUS, by a very partisan 9-0 vote, has cleared the way for Trump to be on the ballot, there is a chance he might steal enough electoral votes to get elected.

Who knew that Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson were all MAGA. But that's another topic.

If Trump does manages to scrounge and steal up to 270, what plans are in place to stop him then?

14th Amendment I suppose. But in all seriousness, your post is quite impossoble to take serious.

Also Bidren can just wipe Trump off the face of the Earth, Trump said so.

You don't take the possibility of a Trump victory seriously?

Well, if he wins legitimately then we have to accept it. If on the other hand he, as you said, “steals up to 270” then there’s a reason to challenge it, just as he challenged his loss (though ultimately failed because there was no evidence of stealth).

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Now that SCOTUS, by a very partisan 9-0 vote, has cleared the way for Trump to be on the ballot, there is a chance he might steal enough electoral votes to get elected.

Who knew that Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson were all MAGA. But that's another topic.

If Trump does manages to scrounge and steal up to 270, what plans are in place to stop him then?

14th Amendment I suppose. But in all seriousness, your post is quite impossoble to take serious.

Also Bidren can just wipe Trump off the face of the Earth, Trump said so.

You don't take the possibility of a Trump victory seriously?

You musn't get out of your threads much.

But assuming immunity for Biden, there appears to be a solution to the Trump candidacy

 

[TSwizzle]

Brandon really is clueless;

when asked by MSNBC about his use of the word 'illegal' in an interview on Saturday night, Biden said he regretted it.
'During your response to her heckling of you, you used the word ‘illegal’ when talking about the man who allegedly killed...' host Jonathan Capehart said. Biden interrupted to say 'undocumented', just as Capehart was pivoting to Laken Riley. 'An undocumented person. I shouldn't have used illegal, it’s undocumented,' the president continued.

Daily Mail

Yeah, wouldn’t want anyone to be offended by calling “Lincoln Riley” killer an illegal.

I hope Jose Ibarra finds it in his heart to forgive Brandon.

 

[Politesse]

Brandon really is clueless;

when asked by MSNBC about his use of the word 'illegal' in an interview on Saturday night, Biden said he regretted it.
'During your response to her heckling of you, you used the word ‘illegal’ when talking about the man who allegedly killed...' host Jonathan Capehart said. Biden interrupted to say 'undocumented', just as Capehart was pivoting to Laken Riley. 'An undocumented person. I shouldn't have used illegal, it’s undocumented,' the president continued.

Daily Mail

Yeah, wouldn’t want anyone to be offended by calling “Lincoln Riley” killer an illegal.

I hope Jose Ibarra finds it in his heart to forgive Brandon.

Using epithets is offensive regardless of who you apply them to.

But of course, the media is seizing on this small breach of propriety as though it were a major issue driving a wedge between Biden and his supporters rather than, as it is back in reality... a small breach of propiety. Rude, but commonplace. Those involved in the issue may be disappointed to hear older politicians use such phrasing, but they are never surprised.

 

[TSwizzle]

Brandon really is clueless;

when asked by MSNBC about his use of the word 'illegal' in an interview on Saturday night, Biden said he regretted it.
'During your response to her heckling of you, you used the word ‘illegal’ when talking about the man who allegedly killed...' host Jonathan Capehart said. Biden interrupted to say 'undocumented', just as Capehart was pivoting to Laken Riley. 'An undocumented person. I shouldn't have used illegal, it’s undocumented,' the president continued.

Daily Mail

Yeah, wouldn’t want anyone to be offended by calling “Lincoln Riley” killer an illegal.

I hope Jose Ibarra finds it in his heart to forgive Brandon.

Using epithets is offensive regardless of who you apply them to.

Indeed, we should call a bank robbery an undocumented cash withdrawal.

Jose Iberra is in the USA illegally and he murdered a US citizen and he’s the victim in this?