Derec
Contributor
You still have to drop it if police orders you to.Hang on - this is an open carry state?
He was a felon, so he was not allowed to have one in the first place.So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
You still have to drop it if police orders you to.Hang on - this is an open carry state?
He was a felon, so he was not allowed to have one in the first place.So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
This is a second case of a black man being in legal possession of a weapon (don't even need a permit in NC for open carry) being killed for having it.
Hang on - this is an open carry state?
So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
I've been convinced by copious evidence that the police are not clear or effective when they scream at people to do stuff. Especially when the people are surprised by the appearance of the police.You still have to drop it if police orders you to.
He was a felon, so he was not allowed to have one in the first place.So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
Hang on - this is an open carry state?
So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
If you disobey orders to drop the weapon, then getting shot by the police is a risk you take. Seriously, is common sense dead?
You still have to drop it if police orders you to.
He was a felon, so he was not allowed to have one in the first place.So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
I have seen previous ones, though, where the orders of the police are confusing, conflicting and unintelligible. I'm sure you've seen that too.
He managed to get one felony plead down to a misdemeanor, but he wasn't as lucky in 2005.He wasn't a felon. Your own post said only misdemeanor conviction.
Keith Lamont Scott: What we know about man shot by Charlotte policeUnder North Carolina law, Scott would have been prohibited from owning firearms or ammunition because he'd been convicted of a violent felony.
When he was 30, in 2003, a Bexar County, Texas, grand jury indicted him on charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and evading arrest with a vehicle after Scott allegedly shot a man the previous year. Scott pleaded no contest and was sentenced to more than eight years in prison after his 2005 conviction.
He managed to get one felony plead down to a misdemeanor, but he wasn't as lucky in 2005.
Keith Lamont Scott: What we know about man shot by Charlotte policeUnder North Carolina law, Scott would have been prohibited from owning firearms or ammunition because he'd been convicted of a violent felony.
When he was 30, in 2003, a Bexar County, Texas, grand jury indicted him on charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and evading arrest with a vehicle after Scott allegedly shot a man the previous year. Scott pleaded no contest and was sentenced to more than eight years in prison after his 2005 conviction.
8 years in prison for shooting somebody. I guess the original article may not have had it because it was out of state.
Huh, only police injuries are worth mentioning.
Nobody should be defending that shit!
I'll defend it.
If agents of the state want to continue acting with impunity sometimes the only way to get their attention is to cause a disturbance. Want this shit to stop? Start holding police accountable. Make them have to go through the same justice system everybody else has to go through instead of the mess of conflicts of interest that is the current way we allow cops to engage in all sorts of bad behavior without suffering anything worse than a paid vacation.
One more thing that's a bit off topic. Most southern states have open carry laws. Why is so easy for white people, mostly men, to open carry without any issues but when a black man openly carries, he's automatically assumed to be a criminal? Just sayin'.
This is a second case of a black man being in legal possession of a weapon (don't even need a permit in NC for open carry) being killed for having it.
Hang on - this is an open carry state?
So WTF is wrong with the guy having a gun!?
I've been convinced by copious evidence that the police are not clear or effective when they scream at people to do stuff. Especially when the people are surprised by the appearance of the police.
why would that be strange?He was in an apartment complex, allegedly waiting for a school bus to drop off his son. A bit strange, I know.
So whatBy the way, Keith Scott has a criminal record.
You do not think the dead guy's criminal history is relevant here?They probably omitted that fact, along with a zillion facts that are irrelevant to the issue of justification. But it is telling that you felt the need to point it out.
Speak for yourself (about being idiots). LEOs respond to situation as it unfolds, but Scott's lengthy criminal history affects how likely police version of events vs. family version of events is. I.e. him being a thug makes it more likely that he was behaving like one when police told him to drop his gun. Scott's criminal history tells us a lot about what kind of man he was, and it does not really jibe with the portrait offered by the family.
Oh! right! Right. The police knew this when they shot him. Forgot.
Black men always abandon their offspring according to alt-right scholars.why would that be strange?
Remember that time a black kid in an open carry case had a toy gun in his belt and two police officers gunned him to death even though he had nothing in his hand? If you don't, the victim's name was Tamir Rice.One more thing that's a bit off topic. Most southern states have open carry laws. Why is so easy for white people, mostly men, to open carry without any issues but when a black man openly carries, he's automatically assumed to be a criminal? Just sayin'.
You don't open-carry a gun in hand when facing the police whether you are white, black or polka-dotted.
Remember that video from a while back purporting to show the different reaction from the police when faced with a white or black person doing open carry? The people who made that video clearly knew there wasn't a problem and so they staged it--they had their actors carry the guns differently.