ruby sparks
Contributor
No, the question DOES have an embedded accusation as the default.
Of course it doesn't. 'Is your distaste for manspreading vengeance, then?' Lol. Totally innocent question.
No, the question DOES have an embedded accusation as the default.
No, the question DOES have an embedded accusation as the default.
Of course it doesn't. 'Is your distaste for manspreading vengeance, then?' Lol. Totally innocent question.
It is not necessary to protest everything bad in order to protest or speak out against one particular thing.
This is certainly true, but we're talking about a "women's march" that at one point championed Linda Sarsour.
How many fucking times do you need to have your false claim corrected? The Women’s March did not champion Linda Sarsour. Likely 99% of us who were there had no idea who she was, or half the other women on the stage that we could not see or hear and weren’t there for anyway.
Stop intentionally misrepresenting the women’s march to score your stupid whiney points.
The women’s march waa not about the speakers or the stage. It was about US, making room in the conversation for justice and equality.
No, the question DOES have an embedded accusation as the default.
Of course it doesn't. 'Is your distaste for manspreading vengeance, then?' Lol. Totally innocent question.
It's a question when it can be answered no and not insisted that it's yes. Unlike when you proclaim hidden agendas about people you have decided you don't like and refuse to take people for what they actually write.
The Women’s March did not champion Linda Sarsour.
The founders and organizers of it did.
And George Washington and Thomas Jefferson had slaves. Everybody knew that at the time.
Constitution is still valid.
Sure babe.
It's a question when it can be answered no and not insisted that it's yes.
It's a question when it can be answered no and not insisted that it's yes.
Seriously. Do you have a mental age of 10, or what?
Nothing wrong with that, obviously. I see your point now.
And by the way, if someone says they believe something (about another poster) to be the case, that's not insisting, nor is it telling the other person what to think. Or are you completely stupid? Also, do you enjoy doing anything else other than going on the internet and whinging about being annoyed by Feminists? Are you trying to get back at women because you hate them? In other words, is it vengeance that informs your views? All perfectly legitimate questions, apparently. I'm so glad you enlightened me.
Which course of action would depend on one’s goals and whether the respondent was likely to over react and shine about it.It's a question when it can be answered no and not insisted that it's yes.
Seriously. Do you have a mental age of 10, or what?
Nothing wrong with that, obviously. I see your point now.
And by the way, if someone says they believe something (about another poster) to be the case, that's not insisting, nor is it telling the other person what to think. Or are you completely stupid? Also, do you enjoy doing anything else other than going on the internet and whinging about being annoyed by Feminists? Are you trying to get back at women because you hate them? In other words, is it vengeance that informs your views? All perfectly legitimate questions, apparently. I'm so glad you enlightened me.
If someone answered your questions with "no, I don't hate women and this isn't vengeance", would you then accept that answer and not ask the same question again?
Or, perhaps it's better not to ask questions and simply make snide asides, like "show me on the doll where the feminist hurt you".
You mean like this?
Indeed. Note the use of a question (with no imbedded accusation) instead of an accusation or judgment. Imagine if Ruby did that instead of telling people what they "really think", or dishonestly editing quotes to try to portray them as saying the opposite not what they said as you did above.
Ask Metaphor. He’s the one who said there were only size S and M gloves? So the world revolves around women, apparently. Yes it’s daft but.....
I think most women would be happy to have exactly the same career consequences of having children that men have.
Or....back on topic.
There is clearly much more to the Women's March Movement than the issues around Israel and Palestine that some of it's leaders have been guilty, imo, of having unnecessarily and unhelpfully brought into the equation. I don't think they have expressly brought them into the movement themselves, but nonetheless. It hasn't, as I understand it, helped the expressed core cause(s) of the movement, including by alienating some of the reportedly 7 million (mostly female) members, most of whom do not 'walk like the duck' in question. I do not know how or why it came about, but it is/was not good, imo.
JP’s persistent message sent (unintentionally or not) is that women are not capable of either knowing or assessing what they are or ought to be doing.How many fucking times do you need to have your false claim corrected? The Women’s March did not champion Linda Sarsour. Likely 99% of us who were there had no idea who she was, or half the other women on the stage that we could not see or hear and weren’t there for anyway.
Stop intentionally misrepresenting the women’s march to score your stupid whiney points.
The women’s march waa not about the speakers or the stage. It was about US, making room in the conversation for justice and equality.
Ask Metaphor. He’s the one who said there were only size S and M gloves? So the world revolves around women, apparently. Yes it’s daft but.....
I don't see the point of the whole glove bit anyway. However, what he said is that he's seen places with only S & M. Not that those are the only sizes in use.
I think most women would be happy to have exactly the same career consequences of having children that men have.
I have seen multiple people on here asking for things like subsidized childcare.
And George Washington and Thomas Jefferson had slaves. Everybody knew that at the time.
Constitution is still valid.
WTF? Did I say women's concerns are not valid? No. I said that this organization decided to prop up Linda Sarsour. And they did. That's a fact. That others showed up not knowing this isn't relevant to what I wrote.
I think the glove thing was weird too, but whatever. His implication was that this was an indication of how much women are favored. It's actually an indication of what size glove people in that work area need and prefer.
I think the glove thing was weird too, but whatever. His implication was that this was an indication of how much women are favored. It's actually an indication of what size glove people in that work area need and prefer.
"The glove thing" was to counter the absurd idea that spaces are built by men and ignore women's needs. If anything, designers seem to be hopeless at catering to human beings that are not from the 1950s.
And George Washington and Thomas Jefferson had slaves. Everybody knew that at the time.
Constitution is still valid.
WTF? Did I say women's concerns are not valid? No. I said that this organization decided to prop up Linda Sarsour. And they did. That's a fact. That others showed up not knowing this isn't relevant to what I wrote.
So the absolute fact that most medical research as well as many other aspects of our society are designed with white male as standard. You chose a poor example for your attempt to prove that everything revolves around women.
So the absolute fact that most medical research as well as many other aspects of our society are designed with white male as standard. You chose a poor example for your attempt to prove that everything revolves around women.
It beggars belief that you'd bring up medical research. Tell me, which do you think is higher: the amount of research money that goes specifically to men's health or the amount of research money that goes specifically to women's health?
Women's health gets more than four times the funding of men's health:
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/h...g/news-story/6bfc4ea7da62ad84743d7451de6de960
But, feminists tell me that sex and gender are illusions so I shouldn't be fussing, I guess.