"They want to start WWIII"

[barbos]

with their mouths shut and their heads cast down

ukrainians live like that already. The Clown is remarkable at that actually.

 

[bilby]

The Germans demonstrated in the 1940s, with their V2 rockets, that ballistic missiles with conventional warheads are a futile waste of resources.

It was (and still is) more effective to put your ballistic missile money, manpower, and resources into other delivery systems - cruise missiles (even including the crude and clunky V1), aircraft, artillery, etc.

For the same dollar expenditure, you can deliver a shitload more HE to target with drones than you can with IRBMs.

The only reason that ballistic rockets weren't abandoned in the 1950s as the futile waste of effort that they so obviously are, is that we invented a warhead so powerful that such rockets were able to deliver enough destruction to pay for themselves.

HE and incendiary bombs are cheap and numerous. Nukes are rare and expensive. Only the latter justifies the cost of a rocket that is essentially impossible to intercept, and then only because it carries the punch of millions of conventional HE or incendiary bombs.

Ballistic missiles are only really useful for delivering nuclear weapons; And nuclear weapons are only really deliverable by ballistic missile (unless you have air supremacy over your targets, and/or can afford to lose a lot of your very expensive bombs to enemy defences).

 

[barbos]

But if Biden doesn't succeed blowing all of us up, I do see this as helping Trump with his negotiations

What senile piece of shit does does not help at all. He is simply mad because his little war on Russia did not go the way Nuland&Co promised. The motherfucker and his criminal gang should be immediately removed from the office.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

The reason why piece of shit in the White House (or rather his handlers) does what he does, is becasue they know that Putin is not what your propaganda says. They know that he is very rational

You're a full grown adult and you believe this? Damn son.

 

[barbos]

The Germans demonstrated in the 1940s, with their V2 rockets, that ballistic missiles with conventional warheads are a futile waste of resources.

It was (and still is) more effective to put your ballistic missile money, manpower, and resources into other delivery systems - cruise missiles (even including the crude and clunky V1), aircraft, artillery, etc.

For the same dollar expenditure, you can deliver a shitload more HE to target with drones than you can with IRBMs.

The only reason that ballistic rockets weren't abandoned in the 1950s as the futile waste of effort that they so obviously are, is that we invented a warhead so powerful that such rockets were able to deliver enough destruction to pay for themselves.

HE and incendiary bombs are cheap and numerous. Nukes are rare and expensive. Only the latter justifies the cost of a rocket that is essentially impossible to intercept, and then only because it carries the punch of millions of conventional HE or incendiary bombs.

Ballistic missiles are only really useful for delivering nuclear weapons; And nuclear weapons are only really deliverable by ballistic missile (unless you have air supremacy over your targets, and/or can afford to lose a lot of your very expensive bombs to enemy defences).

I see a lot of coping and rationalization.
But if you insist then you can ask Putin to load a nuke during the next test.

 

[barbos]

The reason why piece of shit in the White House (or rather his handlers) does what he does, is becasue they know that Putin is not what your propaganda says. They know that he is very rational

You're a full grown adult and you believe this? Damn son.

Yes, and it is not only my opinion.
In fact if you you watch your own propaganda garbage carefully you will notice that they are of the same opinion.
Your old Shitster in the White House expressed the same opinion.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

3) The missiles appear to be fast.

No shit Sherlock.

The missiles didn't appear to be too harmful.

LOL, OK. but they are pretty effective.

Ah, memories. I remember the days way back when you'd justify the attacks on buildings in Ukraine because the military was allegedly hiding there or Ukraine was the one who actually attacked the civilians.

Now days, you don't even hide the fact you don't care Ukrainians are being murdered by Russian missiles. Almost seems to make you giddy that Russia has a new toy to test on the meaningless Slavic people.

 

[barbos]

3) The missiles appear to be fast.

No shit Sherlock.

The missiles didn't appear to be too harmful.

LOL, OK. but they are pretty effective.

Ah, memories. I remember the days way back when you'd justify the attacks on buildings in Ukraine because the military was allegedly hiding there or Ukraine was the one who actually attacked the civilians.

Now days, you don't even hide the fact you don't care Ukrainians are being murdered by Russian missiles. Almost seems to make you giddy that Russia has a new toy to test on the meaningless Slavic people.

Military installation was hit. And secondly Putin promised to announce the next test so that civilians can vacate the target area.

 

[laughing dog]

But if Biden doesn't succeed blowing all of us up, I do see this as helping Trump with his negotiations

What senile piece of shit does does not help at all. He is simply mad because his little war on Russia did not go the way Nuland&Co promised. The motherfucker and his criminal gang should be immediately removed from the office.

You are being pretty hard on Putin. Accurate, but hard.

 

[Toni]

The idea that the side that reacts to an attack is STARTING a war is insane.

Tell that to those sucking Hamas cocks.

 

[laughing dog]

The idea that the side that reacts to an attack is STARTING a war is insane.

Tell that to those sucking Hamas cocks.

It is insane whoever says its. That doesn't stop the insanity, it just identifies it.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

The idea that the side that reacts to an attack is STARTING a war is insane.

Tell that to those sucking Hamas cocks.

Technically that war started well before Hamas and their cocks existed.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Ah, memories. I remember the days way back when you'd justify the attacks on buildings in Ukraine because the military was allegedly hiding there or Ukraine was the one who actually attacked the civilians.

Now days, you don't even hide the fact you don't care Ukrainians are being murdered by Russian missiles. Almost seems to make you giddy that Russia has a new toy to test on the meaningless Slavic people.

Military installation was hit. And secondly Putin promised to announce the next test so that civilians can vacate the target area.

I can't wait until the day that barbos is laughing about the civilians suffering from the hypersonic missile attacks. As of now, he only does it for more conventional fare (fair?).

 

[Harry Bosch]

The reason why piece of shit in the White House (or rather his handlers) does what he does, is becasue they know that Putin is not what your propaganda says. They know that he is very rational

You're a full grown adult and you believe this? Damn son.

Yes, and it is not only my opinion.
In fact if you you watch your own propaganda garbage carefully you will notice that they are of the same opinion.
Your old Shitster in the White House expressed the same opinion.

Bullies always hate people that stand up to them the most.

 

[RVonse]

I am really astounded how successful Putin's narrative has become. He has completely captured our right wing media.

What do you believe the world will look like if Putin wins and the US loses? Will your life be poorer or less free? Will you still be alive if Putin wins?

Virtually all news that we see in the media was created by one of three agencies – Associated Press, Reuters, and, to a lesser degree, AFP.
All three companies are owned by the same parent companies, who, in turn, own most of the Western corporatist structure, and, not surprisingly, the reports that they distribute to the media are boilerplate. Do you think it is possible that many in the US have already been captured by our main stream media in any way? Or is it just Putin and the right wing media that holds the official narrative?

 

[laughing dog]

I am really astounded how successful Putin's narrative has become. He has completely captured our right wing media.

What do you believe the world will look like if Putin wins and the US loses? Will your life be poorer or less free? Will you still be alive if Putin wins

The world will look worse. My life will be poorer in the knowledge that
1) the formerly free people oF Ukraine are under the thumb of a ruthless dictator, and
2) the USA has become cowardly and untrustworthy.

Your last question is truly pointless.

Virtually all news that we see in the media was created by one of three agencies – Associated Press, Reuters, and, to a lesser degree, AFP.
All three companies are owned by the same parent companies, who, in turn, own most of the Western corporatist structure, and, not surprisingly, the reports that they distribute to the media are boilerplate. Do you think it is possible that many in the US have already been captured by our main stream media in any way? Or is it just Putin and the right wing media that holds the official narrative?

Your hat needs more tinfoil.

 

[Ford]

I am really astounded how successful Putin's narrative has become. He has completely captured our right wing media.

What do you believe the world will look like if Putin wins and the US loses? Will your life be poorer or less free? Will you still be alive if Putin wins?

Do you honestly think Putin cares about you and wants your life to be better? Do you think he's trying to storm across Ukraine, annex the former Soviet Republics and conquer Poland to make your life easier?

Because it seems like you're saying "yes, I absolutely want Putin to re-establish a sort of Russian Empire." How does that help you?

 

[Elixir]

... it seems like you're saying "yes, I absolutely want Putin to re-establish a sort of Russian Empire." How does that help you?

It owns the libs. How cool!

 

[ZiprHead]

Virtually all news that we see in the media was created by one of three agencies – Associated Press, Reuters, and, to a lesser degree, AFP.
All three companies are owned by the same parent companies, who, in turn, own most of the Western corporatist structure, and, not surprisingly, the reports that they distribute to the media are boilerplate.

What right wing nut job told you that? Have you fallen for the "they are all owned by the Rothschilds" bullshit? Is this going to be another case of you believing some right wing blowhard then coming here without fact checking and spreading the bullshit and making a fool of yourself AGAIN?

The Associated Press (AP) is owned by its American newspaper and broadcast members:

• Ownership
  The AP is a not-for-profit news cooperative that is owned by its American newspaper and broadcast members.
• Funding
  The AP's main source of funding is revenue from licensing its content across formats, including digital.

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages. Reuters is one of the largest and most trusted news agencies in the world.

I don't even know what you mean by AFP. Are you referring to the French news agency? Alpha-fetoprotein?

Really, I'm curious. Who told you this?

 

[Patooka]

What do you believe the world will look like if Putin wins and the US loses? Will your life be poorer or less free? Will you still be alive if Putin wins?

Fuck me you are so ignorant. If Putin wins in Ukraine he will be in charge of 10% of the entire world's wheat and grain exports.

You claim (wrongly) to be middle class. You claim to be (wrongly) for the working man. You claim to be (wrongly) supporting US farmers. I'm assuming you don't understand commerce so you don't understand how much influence a single person with 10% of a basic supply has.

I'll give you a hint.

Ukraine's grain exports are crucial to Africa's food security

By helping Ukraine sell its grain, the West can offer the African continent an alternative to Russia’s grain and decrease Russia’s profits.

www.atlanticcouncil.org

But genius that you are, I'm sure your reply is, "let them eat cake"

And, that's only 20% of the answer. Another 20% involves China but I'm sure you'll blame that on Biden because that's what you do.