Okay, seriously, folks. Give this some thought - if the US restructured corporate taxes to something that made even of modicum of sense... and reduced personal taxes on all but the very highest brackets to offset that change... Do you think UBI would even be needed?
Yes, of course it would.
How much benefit do you imagine an unemployed person gets from having his personal income taxes reduced?
How much benefit do you imagine someone earning less than the standard deduction gets from having his personal income taxes reduced?
And these are just the groups of people who get zero benefit from tax cuts. Immediately above them in income are people who get a benefit from the cuts, but for whom its dollar value is utterly inadequate to achieve anything worthwhile.
Why aren't you out there arguing that ALL countries should have UBI? Why aren't you a proponent of this as the best possible solution for the entire planet?
What on Earth makes you think that I am not?
Your laser focus on the United States of America isn't a perspective that I either share, or admire; Frankly I would be much happier to discuss this topic with reference to an OECD nation with a less bizarre and ideosyncratic set of fundamental assumptions about economics and personal finances, because the unspoken (and often unconsidered) assumption, that the USA is the sole basis and exemplar for all of this stuff, is frankly stupid and exhausting.
But to use any other nation's status quo as the basis for this debate would exclude most of the Americans here from participation in our discussion, because Americans show an astonishing disinclination to attempt to grasp the fact that other countries are not "just like the US, only not as good".
I have, perforce, become familiar with strange and uniquely American terms and their specific meanings in US speak, like FICA, 401k, HMO, Social Security, Red/Blue politics, etc., etc., and I recognise that attempting to persuade any worthwhile number of Americans to gain a similar understanding of the jargon used in any non-US country, sufficient to discuss such things as UBI, is a futile excercise.
We are talking only about the USA, because
you are talking only about the USA.
As an example of this, we need look no further than your question:
Why aren't you out there arguing that ALL countries should have UBI?
Your absolute, rock-solid, unquestioned and unquestionable assumption that I am not - That this entire discussion is and must be ONLY about your country, and your country alone - is an astonishing failure on your part.
I only wish that I could also describe it as surprising, but it is, sadly, the very opposite of surprising.
I don't live in the US. I rarely visit the US. I have never worked in the US. I care very little for or about the US. But I understand that if I am to discuss anything online, I need to do the hard work of learning about Anerican systems, policies, methods, and problems; Because Americans are both by far the most numerous and vocal group of netizens, and by far the least likely to have any knowledge whatsoever about the world outside their home country, or to put in the hard work to learn.