Sheriff's badges are represented with little balls on the pointy ends of the stars.
Then again if you had just ignored the protests, Mr. Trump, and quietly changed it, it would have been forgotten by now.
Sheriff's badges are represented with little balls on the pointy ends of the stars.
Then again if you had just ignored the protests, Mr. Trump, and quietly changed it, it would have been forgotten by now.
Ya, this should have been a good week for Trump where he could continuously hammer Clinton over the email thing and the FBI Director castigating her, but half of the stories are about him re-tweeting white supremacist stuff. He really blew an opportunity here.
Yes, it again illustrates how incredibly incompetent Trump is when it comes to politics. But it also illustrates again something that several analysts (Psychological and Sociological) have written in the past several months, and that is the immaturity displayed by Trump. He is a spoiled child. He has spent his whole life getting his way. He has spent his whole life ignoring the flaws in his personality and demanding that others do the same. Any adult would have recognized this tweet as a mistake, acknowledged it as that and moved on. Trump reminds me of a child, who even though he is caught red handed, denies he has done anything wrong.Sheriff's badges are represented with little balls on the pointy ends of the stars.
Then again if you had just ignored the protests, Mr. Trump, and quietly changed it, it would have been forgotten by now.
Ya, this should have been a good week for Trump where he could continuously hammer Clinton over the email thing and the FBI Director castigating her, but half of the stories are about him re-tweeting white supremacist stuff. He really blew an opportunity here.
Cincinnati, Ohio (CNN) — Donald Trump on Wednesday said his staff "shouldn't have" deleted a tweet from his account that immediately drew criticism for evoking anti-Semitic imagery.
"Should have left it up," Trump said of his staff, who deleted the tweet less than three hours after it was posted amid the swift backlash from different corners of the political world. "I would've rather defended it."
Totally.I think it would be totally awesome if Bernie Sanders just blew his top and went full on righteous rant for 20 minutes. He has motherfucking earned it.
Meanwhile in Poll Land, we have a consensus:
Rasmussen - Clinton 40 Trump 42
Reuters - Clinton 44 Trump 33
Oddly in Rasmussen, Clinton's number is below her low, while Trump is floating near where he has been. The opposite for Reuters, Trump's numbers are way low while Clinton's are where they have been.
Apparently polling is real hard these days. Of course, this is a national poll and only really matters in whether Trump is dumped in Cleveland.
Always throw out Rasmussen. There biased to Republican.Meanwhile in Poll Land, we have a consensus:
Rasmussen - Clinton 40 Trump 42
Reuters - Clinton 44 Trump 33
Oddly in Rasmussen, Clinton's number is below her low, while Trump is floating near where he has been. The opposite for Reuters, Trump's numbers are way low while Clinton's are where they have been.
Apparently polling is real hard these days. Of course, this is a national poll and only really matters in whether Trump is dumped in Cleveland.
Poll results like these are why it's best to look at poll averages like those that HuffPo and RCP maintain rather than single polls.
For the sake of democracy it's best that parties take turns in the White House. Otherwise one Party takes the people for granted. Having said that though, both likely Party candidates are not worthy to be leaders of the free world.
On the left there's aproven liar, on the right a man who's all bluster with weird ideas.
What a dilemma!
Rep Issa (R-Cal) is now ranting about shutting down the government over the Clinton e-mails
For the sake of democracy it's best that parties take turns in the White House. Otherwise one Party takes the people for granted. Having said that though, both likely Party candidates are not worthy to be leaders of the free world.
On the left there's aproven liar, on the right a man who's all bluster with weird ideas.
What a dilemma!
FIFY.
No one has "proven" HRC "lied" and Director Comey said precisely the opposite - that she did NOT lie to the FBI
FIFY.
No one has "proven" HRC "lied" and Director Comey said precisely the opposite - that she did NOT lie to the FBI
damn, I thought you were more sanguine and less of a partisan hack than that. She lied the american people.
(at about 10:26 a.m. before congress)during an exchange over false statements made by Clinton on her private email server.
“Did Hillary Clinton lie under oath?” Chaffetz asked.
“Not to the FBI,” Comey responded. “Not in a case we were working.”
Chaffetz then reminded the FBI director that Clinton claimed under oath that “there was nothing marked classified” in her emails, either “sent or received.”
Comey said was “aware” of the comments but the FBI has not investigated the testimony because there has not been a referral from Congress.
“Do you need a referral from Congress to investigate her statements under oath?” Chaffetz pressed.
“Sure do,” Comey replied.
“You’ll have one,” Chaffetz said. “You’ll have one in the next few hours.”