Well that escalated quickly.
Less than an hour to go from "how dare this person use such foul language!" to "go fuck yourself."
Charming.
Who said that ? Not me. But it is a pity that this is where we are at with US politics today.
So what exactly is the "nonsense" you're starting threads to complain about? That a democrat said something about impeachment? Because without your pearl clutching over bad words, what is your complaint here?
I think this shouldn't be too hard if one is willing to give a modicum of charity in their interpretation of the OP. You jumped the the conclusion that this was about pearl clutching, or perhaps even just "pwning the libs". But I think a more charitable interpretation is pretty obvious, but one has to be willing and vigilant not let one's ideology control one's thinking and try to read subtext into everything a perceived "opponent" is saying (and to truly walk the fine line, one would never to forget that
may be a subtext after all).
But anyway, one could argue that impeachment of Trump is going to be a
huge political risk. At least, historically it has been risky. Firstly, the Republicans still control the Senate, and the Republicans could clearly not care less about Trump's ineptitude and corruption. Depending on the results of the Mueller investigation, this could go several ways, as far as I can see it:
1) Mueller finds nothing of substance. This wouldn't be great for the Dem's, it will allow Trump and the Republicans to run with the "witch hunt" narrative. This won't convince people on either end, but the middle won't be significantly moved in either direction.
2) Mueller find's evidence that is pretty bad, but not bad enough for impeachment, or it rests on something like perjury. I believe this is the worst of all cases. The Dem's will be forced by "The Resistance" wing to pursue impeachment, but it may be only half-hearted on the Dem side overall, and the Republicans won't budge. This could potentially swing the middle towards the right. In other words, a repeat of the Clinton impeachment politically but with the sides reversed. This would be bad. Even if they do get him impeached in the end (highly doubtful in this scenario anyway).
3) Mueller finds damning evidence, a smoking gun that proves the worst case scenario, something like Trump allowing Russian influence into US foreign policy in exchange for money, or not to get blackmailed, and Trump is successfully impeached because not even the Republicans can defend him anymore. However, a lot of Republicans will feel like Trump is a martyr. This sort of know-nothing nativism will live on with a patron saint. Overall, this would be good for the Dems, but probably not the best outcome.
The best possible outcome for the Democrats is to defeat him in 2020.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a point to this thread other than somebody said something?
It's disappointing that we have a crass and incompetent president that could quite possibly get a second term. I was hoping that the democrats could concentrate on winning the next election rather than this sort of nonsense.
I agree. I was hoping the Democrats wouldn't sink to Trump's level but now the flood gates are opened and civility is dead and we're that much closer to an Idiocracy. What Rashida Tlaib did should be condemned, but Pelosi is afraid to show any weakness, even after just decidedly gaining back her leadership in the House. It's something I'd expect from a Rosanne Barr, not someone elected to be setting an example for our children, to say nothing of her own. Simply disgraceful.
I think literally no one in this thread has condemned the
choice of language. That was just the knee-jerk interpretation.
As to her saying motherfucker? Who cares? Fuck people who care.