Should a person, regardless of anatomy, be held responsible for a child he, she, or they, do not want? Is this the crux of the issue?
No, the crux of the issue is whether a person, regardless of anatomy, should be
required to create a child he, she, or they, do not want, if they have the biological potential to do so.
It’s fairly obvious that the answer is ‘no’, but that obviousness is obscured by idiots who declare that potential is the same as actual, and by zealots who believe that enjoying sex should be prohibited to women, and who wish to ensure that doing so is as risky as possible for them in every conceivable way (pun intended).
Of course, there’s considerable overlap in membership of the sets ‘idiots’ and ‘zealots’.