• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Yet another war, this time with Iran

Yea, Trump on global TV said Netanyahu will do what he says.

And Netanyahu has to bite his tongue and take it,
 
How is putting a 20% fee on shipping not a mob "protection" scheme?
"Nice tanker yous got there, be a shame if somtin bad happened to it"
 
House votes to limit Trump on Iran; Senate fails to advance similar measure

The House passed a measure to halt the war in Iran on Thursday, as Democrats mounted a last-minute bid to constrain the escalating conflict before lawmakers left Washington for a month-long recess.

The effort led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) passed by a vote of 214-208. Four Republicans — Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania), Thomas Massie (Kentucky), Warren Davidson (Ohio) and Tom Barrett (Michigan) — joined Democrats in supporting the measure.

The Senate blocked consideration of a similar resolution hours later on a 49-47 procedural vote.
Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) was the lone Republican to join Democrats in supporting the measure. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) voted against it.
 
Here it comes.

Trump made vague references to invading Iran. Troops moved from Europe.

Like Putin all Trump can do is escalate. Around 1967 the militray had concluded there was no militray solution in Vietnam. Revealed by Daniel Ellsberg an inside intelligence analyst. Yet the war went on until 1975. Nixon's so called Peace With Honor.

Unrestricted bombing of the North did being North Vietnam to the negotiation table. Kissinger got a Nobel Peace Prize for the negations.

We pulled out leaving ARVN to fend for itself. Predictably the North broke the agreement and over ran the South.

General Võ Nguyên Giáp famously described resisting foreign occupation through a "people's war," stating: "Guerrilla warfare is a means of fighting a revolutionary war that relies on the heroic spirit to triumph over modern weapons." He also noted that material superiority does not guarantee victory: "It is the human factor, and not material resources, that decide the outcome of war."

Anyone who thinks Iran is going to capitualte is not playing with a full deck.

Trump may be thnking he can get to Tehran and capture or kill the leaders.
 
How is putting a 20% fee on shipping not a mob "protection" scheme?
"Nice tanker yous got there, be a shame if somtin bad happened to it"
And how threatening to destroy Nord Stream in front of German Chancellor and cameras is not the same thing?
 
Something came to mind on another thread.

When there was talk of a Palestinian state and peace Israel would say who in this state will ensure security?


Hams and Fatah fought a civil war for power having nothing to do with Israel. Hams ran Gaza, Fatah West Bank. There was supposed to be free elections but neither side would be willing to give up power.

Hams ruled Gaza by fear.

At one point Israel was collecting taxes for the PA Palestinian Authority and givng loans

And the corruption. A lot of money went to Palestinians form America, Europe, and Arabs. Did lite good for Palestinians..

Remember Yasser Arafat? He made a point of dressings in military fatigues wearing combat boots. but drove around in a luzery car.

When he died his wife went to France. Yasser Arafat never had a job, so where did all the money come from?

AI Overview
Yasser Arafat's widow, Suha Arafat, faced intense public criticism and investigations for her luxurious lifestyle and alleged financial corruption. French authorities scrutinized large monthly transfers to her accounts in 2004, and Tunisia issued an arrest warrant in 2011 over a disputed business deal. She denied all wrongdoing.

AI Overview
Yes, Yasser Arafat controlled a massive personal and organizational fortune. Investigations by journalists, international bodies like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and intelligence agencies estimated his hidden financial empire was worth between $1 billion and $3 billion, with some estimates running even higher.

Arafat was major ahtor and payer in pece negotiations.

AI Overview
Yasser Arafat's relationship with Iran was not a simple, permanent alliance; it shifted from an enthusiastic initial partnership into decades of rivalry and cold hostility.

AI Overview
Yes, Yasser Arafat lived under a constant, lifelong fear of assassination and spent decades taking extreme security precautions to protect his life.

A stable self ruled Palestinian state was probably never in the cards.

Putting Israel aside you might say Palestinians have been their own worse enemy.
 
Bombshell Report Reveals Trump Admin Removed US Troops’ Names From Iran Casualty List

President Donald Trump’s administration removed four American service members from the Pentagon’s public Iran war casualty count after determining they died following the president’s April ceasefire declaration, according to a bombshell report from The New York Times.

The outlet reported Thursday that the Defense Department’s casualty website listed 18 U.S. service members killed in the conflict on Wednesday before the figure was reduced to 14 the following day. Three military officials told the Times that the change reflected a decision to exclude four troops killed over the weekend because their deaths occurred after Trump declared a ceasefire in April. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations.

Pentagon acting press secretary Joel Valdez disputed that characterization, telling the Times the change stemmed from “temporary data disruptions” and “anomalies” affecting the website that he said would soon be corrected.
Uh huh...
 
Putting Israel aside you might say Palestinians have been their own worse enemy.
Ya think?
Yea I think. I have been focusing on Israel taking of Palestinian land, but there are two sides to it. I posted this stuff before. A lot of people today probably don't know who who Arafat was and his influence on the issues.

As I said way back I tried to take a balanced view on the issue. Today I support ending militray aid to Israel, or at lest pacing conditions on it.

Polls are showing among voters across parties there has been a huge shift from support for Israel to ending aid.

Netanyahu got carried away with himself and in the long run Israel may end up alone.
 
Trump may be thnking he can get to Tehran and capture or kill the leaders.
Killing the leaders seems like a good idea, right? Wonder why they didn’t think of that already.
This is a viable strategy against a dictatorship. Kill the guy in charge, maybe a couple of adult sons who might inherit, and the regime will likely fall - dictatorships are brittle, because dictators who have effective succession plans risk their succsessor deciding to speed things up through assassination, so most dictators are keen to avoid putting such plans into place.

Iran is not a dictatorship.

Perhaps somebody in the Whitehouse or the Pentagon should have noticed that fact, before February 28th 2026.

Iran has a regime that was specifically designed to protect the Islamic Revolution against a decapitation strategy, whether domestic or foreign, having come to power itself using such a strategy, and having understood the vulnerability of a dictatorship to such an attack.

Killing the leaders just puts into power a set of new, even more radical and millitant, leaders.
 
Killing the leaders of Iraq and Libya ended inn factional militias and conflicts.

AI Overview
Iraq shows notable improvements in domestic security and everyday public safety, but its overall stability remains fragile due to regional conflicts, political fragmentation, and high-level corruption.

Back in the 80s Iranian immigrants I worked with said there were some good feelings for USA among people, but if we attacked it would galvanize the people.

As I understand it The Republican Guard is highly independent. They own businesses.

They are not entirely under control of the supreme leader.

A deal was made and eventually ships attacked. The deal makers in Iran may have had no control over it.

An old story.

AI Overview
Formally, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is under the command of Iran's Supreme Leader, who holds the constitutional power to appoint and dismiss its leaders. However, practical control has shifted significantly, with military commanders increasingly driving strategic decisions and exerting deep influence over the clerical establishment.

Given the attacks and deaths in Iran my guess is the IRGC and civilian supporters will choose to go out in a blaze a religious glory rather than make a deal with Trump.

That would mean full scale invasion and occupation of Iran. Iraq all over again.

In keeling thsupremee leader Trump may have killed the only one who could have made a deal.

In the first Gulf War GHWB decided not to invade Iraq because toppling Hussein would lead to unpredictable results. He had WWII combat experience and personal relations in the region. He understood the cultures.

In retrospect Biden was right to pull the plug and get out of Afghanistan.
 
Something came to mind on another thread.

When there was talk of a Palestinian state and peace Israel would say who in this state will ensure security?


Hams and Fatah fought a civil war for power having nothing to do with Israel. Hams ran Gaza, Fatah West Bank. There was supposed to be free elections but neither side would be willing to give up power.

Hams ruled Gaza by fear.

At one point Israel was collecting taxes for the PA Palestinian Authority and givng loans

And the corruption. A lot of money went to Palestinians form America, Europe, and Arabs. Did lite good for Palestinians..

Remember Yasser Arafat? He made a point of dressings in military fatigues wearing combat boots. but drove around in a luzery car.

When he died his wife went to France. Yasser Arafat never had a job, so where did all the money come from?
I thought Arafat got this money from posing with a gun, denouncing Israel and the West and selling keffiyehs.
 
So the lying sack of shit says:

President Donald Trump said Monday that the US halted strikes on Iran at the request of the nation’s regime, warning that it would resume its attacks if the two sides failed to strike a new ceasefire deal.

“They asked us very nicely, ‘Please stop, let’s meet,’” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “And that’s where we are right now, see what happens. If we don’t make a deal, we go back to the same thing.”

I'd guess that there is about 1 in 1000 chance that Iran asked for a meeting. There is about 999 out of 1000 chance that Trump just made that up.

Who on earth, other than MAGA morons, accepts anything that Trump says as anything but a lie these days?


 
We've been "going back to the same thing" several times now. Doing the time warp again isn't progress and our energy backups are dwindling.
 
SINCE THE US launched its war against Iran in late February, the country’s hackers have struck back with retaliatory intrusions that have ranged from paralyzing medical supplies company Stryker to breaching the personal email of FBI director Kash Patel. Now, after an unprecedented wave of disruptive cyberattacks hit water utilities in Minnesota, a memo circulated within the water industry ties those attacks to Iran, too, in the widest and most disruptive strike yet inflicted by the country’s hackers against the US since the war began.
 
Back
Top Bottom