Elixir
Made in America
Birds of a feather …The police keep siding with the right wing morons.
Birds of a feather …The police keep siding with the right wing morons.
What we do know that the victim of an alleged assault who had marks on him was arrested for being drunk and disorderly but none of the alleged assailants were arrested.
How civil are women supposed to be when they are surprised by a man in the women’s bathroom?If her behavior had been civil there would not have been three people coming to her supposed rescue.I am still struggling to see the justification in examining and criticizing the behavior of a cis woman who verbally confronted a trans man when he was in the woman’s bathroom. Why does THAT deserve so much discussion, rather than the impossible position Ruiz was placed in—and the difficult position of the cis woman who confronted him?
What was presented was a news article. Some of us have searched out other articles. They are all extremely similar.What we do know that the victim of an alleged assault who had marks on him was arrested for being drunk and disorderly but none of the alleged assailants were arrested.
What you're doing here is making claims because somebody and his mom said so.
Unevidenced claims. But claims you prefer to believe, so you aren't questioning them too deeply.
Sounds religious to me.
Tom
What was presented was a news article. Some of us have searched out other articles. They are all extremely similar.
Ruiz does not seem to put any blame on the woman for shouting. Which leads to the question as to why men in this thread are.
There you go again, making stuff up. Everything I posted comes from sources.What we do know that the victim of an alleged assault who had marks on him was arrested for being drunk and disorderly but none of the alleged assailants were arrested.
What you're doing here is making claims because somebody and his mom said so.
Unevidenced claims. But claims you prefer to believe, so you aren't questioning them too deeply.
There you go again, making stuff up. Everything I posted comes from sources.What we do know that the victim of an alleged assault who had marks on him was arrested for being drunk and disorderly but none of the alleged assailants were arrested.
What you're doing here is making claims because somebody and his mom said so.
Unevidenced claims. But claims you prefer to believe, so you aren't questioning them too deeply.
the article in the OP abd every other article I found was based on statements by Ruiz.There you go again, making stuff up. Everything I posted comes from sources.What we do know that the victim of an alleged assault who had marks on him was arrested for being drunk and disorderly but none of the alleged assailants were arrested.
What you're doing here is making claims because somebody and his mom said so.
Unevidenced claims. But claims you prefer to believe, so you aren't questioning them too deeply.
Got a source that isn't based on Ruiz?
If I believed everything on the internet that was sourced from Donald J Trump I'd have different political opinions.
Tom
read the thread yourself.Ruiz does not seem to put any blame on the woman for shouting. Which leads to the question as to why men in this thread are.
Who is blaming her for shouting?
Tom
But your explanation is wrong. Your explanation assumes I was talking about Ruiz. I was talking about the "cis woman".You're taking my words out of context. I already explained why I'm saying it's not binary in this case.Could you show me where this happened? Because I don't think it did.Except you are taking gender as binary.
@Bomb#20 distinguishes between sex and gender. Not everyone does.
Lots of IIDB posters flip flop around between sex and gender.
Possibly he did, but I don't remember it. I do remember lots of other members doing so.
Tom
Exactly.article in the OP abd every other article I found was based on statements by Ruiz.
I have.read the thread yourself.
Yes. I only have my phone and this is the best I could doThere you go again, making stuff up. Everything I posted comes from sources.What we do know that the victim of an alleged assault who had marks on him was arrested for being drunk and disorderly but none of the alleged assailants were arrested.
What you're doing here is making claims because somebody and his mom said so.
Unevidenced claims. But claims you prefer to believe, so you aren't questioning them too deeply.
Got a source that isn't based on Ruiz?
Moreover, contrary to your repeated assertions, Ruiz was arrested for disorderly conduct and obstructing official police business.
Post 302 is one example. Post 378 you do not contest that Ruiz was drunk. We don’t know that he was drunk.Moreover, contrary to your repeated assertions, Ruiz was arrested for disorderly conduct and obstructing official police business.
What are you talking about?
Ruiz got arrested for disorderly conduct and "obstructing police business"( whatever that is).
Where did I assert anything different?
Tom
Post 302 is one example. Post 378 you do not contest that Ruiz was drunk. We don’t know that he was drunk.Moreover, contrary to your repeated assertions, Ruiz was arrested for disorderly conduct and obstructing official police business.
What are you talking about?
Ruiz got arrested for disorderly conduct and "obstructing police business"( whatever that is).
Where did I assert anything different?
Tom
This is exactly the point I keep trying to make.
Nobody knows what actually happened.
Leaving out all the trans and women's security stuff,
What we've got is a bunch of unsupported claims being made by someone claiming victim status. That's it.
People keep filling in details and facts and ascribing motivations. Based almost entirely on their ideological biases.
For all anyone on IIDB knows, Ruiz could have thrown the first punch outside the bathroom. There's simply no way to tell. He got arrested for drunk and disorderly. His mom agreed that he was drunk and disorderly. I see those as more substantial information than his claim to be a victim.
Tom
Your own words in that post “He got arrested for drunk and disorderly”. He wasn’t arrested for being drunk. I realize it is hard to keep track of the stuff you make up, but that was in the text you posted.Post 302 is one example. Post 378 you do not contest that Ruiz was drunk. We don’t know that he was drunk.Moreover, contrary to your repeated assertions, Ruiz was arrested for disorderly conduct and obstructing official police business.
What are you talking about?
Ruiz got arrested for disorderly conduct and "obstructing police business"( whatever that is).
Where did I assert anything different?
Tom
Here's post 302
This is exactly the point I keep trying to make.
Nobody knows what actually happened.
Leaving out all the trans and women's security stuff,
What we've got is a bunch of unsupported claims being made by someone claiming victim status. That's it.
People keep filling in details and facts and ascribing motivations. Based almost entirely on their ideological biases.
For all anyone on IIDB knows, Ruiz could have thrown the first punch outside the bathroom. There's simply no way to tell. He got arrested for drunk and disorderly. His mom agreed that he was drunk and disorderly. I see those as more substantial information than his claim to be a victim.
Tom
Where did I claim anything different?
Tom
Then why are you posting in this thread? Genuinely curious.Your correct, I didn't read an article about a minor dustup in an Ohio campground. I don't really care enough.Like the Sheriff saying Noah Ruiz was intoxicated and belligerent? That is in the article too. You say you know nothing, and part of that is you didn't apparently read the article (or remember any detail after reading it),
But I almost bothered mentioning the likelihood of alcohol being involved. I didn't know about it in the context of this particular anecdote, but I've got a strong familiarity with American recreational tendencies.
Tom
His mom described that as what happened,Your own words in that post “He got arrested for drunk and disorderly”. He wasn’t arrested for being drunk. I realize it is hard to keep track of the stuff you make up, but that was in the text you posted.
Then why are you posting in this thread? Genuinely curious.
That is not what you wrote. You claimed he was arrested for being drunk.His mom described that as what happened,Your own words in that post “He got arrested for drunk and disorderly”. He wasn’t arrested for being drunk. I realize it is hard to keep track of the stuff you make up, but that was in the text you posted.
According to "sources" .
What sources are you referring to?
Tom