Climate plays a major factor. The forests are a little warmer, a little drier. And more and more pine forest is falling to pests that the winters aren't quite cold enough to kill off--more fuel for the fires.The devastating wildfires that are catching the attention of the climate apocalypse ghouls have nothing to do with "climate change". These fires in the Pacific Palisades are being exasperated by some glorious incompetence from likes of LA City Mayor Karen Bass, who incidentally is on a nice little jolly to Ghana for the coronation of a king or something (while Rome burns and all that) a lack of water at the fire hydrants and a lack of resources. Perhaps if the LA City fire chief hadn't been a DEI hire (Kristen Crowley, hailed as the first LBGQWERTY non binary female or something) we would have a competent leader in charge of the effort. There is indeed a lot of finger pointing at the likes of insufferable prick Gavin Newson, Karen Bass and the LA County board of supervisors over this. Newsom will undoubtably blame climate change for this because he's a fucking moron. The multi millionaires whose homes have been destroyed should think long and hard about who they vote for to run the state and city in future.
Anyway, it is a catastrophic 69 degrees in a blustery Santa Monica today. My patio furniture was blown over, oh the humanity!!
Have you not noticed the change from cleaning up ship fuel? That was human-caused cooling that got considerably reduced (sulfur dioxide reflects sunlight back into space. But sulfur dioxide + water = sulfuric acid, it corrodes a lot of things) and we got a termination shock. Blowing away record temperatures in many, many places.
Human caused climate change? I would consider if there was evidence of it!
I have always said that human behavior is a major factor in California wildfires.
“Fire has been killing and displacing people since the dawn of man. There’s nothing unusual about this!”
Using the search function, I can confirm two things:Nah, you just don't like it when I point out the obvious flaws in the studies written by activist "scientists" that get presented on here as "science". We've been through this routine numerous times, it is beyond tedious.
Rank | Temperature | Year |
1 | 75.6 | 2019 |
75.6 | 2017 | |
3 | 75.5 | 2018 |
4 | 75.4 | 2015 |
5 | 75.3 | 2023 |
6 | 74.6 | 2020 |
74.6 | 2007 | |
8 | 74.5 | 2024 |
74.5 | 2022 | |
10 | 74.4 | 2016 |
^^^ as predictedHuman caused climate change? I would consider if there was evidence of it!
Oh Noes!!! An apocalyptic 75 degrees!!11!!Here's the top ten warmest years where I live.
They started keeping records at the current location in 1937.
Our climate is moderated by proximity to the ocean.
You might guess what kind of ocean temps we've been seeing guess the impact that's had on cyclone intensity.
Rank Temperature Year 1 75.6 2019 75.6 2017 3 75.5 2018 4 75.4 2015 5 75.3 2023 6 74.6 2020 74.6 2007 8 74.5 2024 74.5 2022 10 74.4 2016
Back in 1998 I had trouble believing that we'd beat 1998.
We'll that's why I replaced my plum trees with mango.
Warmer temperatures and severe drought are driving increases in wildfire activity in the western United States, threatening forest ecosystems. However, identifying the influence of fire severity on tree cover loss (TCL) is challenging using commonly used categorical metrics. In this study, we quantify regional trends in wildfire-driven TCL as the product of annual burned area, average forest exposure (pre-fire tree cover), and average fire severity (relative loss of tree cover).
… recent changes in burned areas alone cannot explain observed tree cover trends. Linear regression analysis revealed that warmer summers and drier winters were significant drivers of increasing forest exposure, fire severity, and burned area (R2 from 0.54 to 0.80, p ⩽ 0.001), particularly in the northern forests. Climate extremes had a disproportionate impact on dense forests that were once more resistant to wildfire but now face risks from a shifting wildfire regime.
And there are multiple citations to earlier studies establishing the increase in fire danger over the past many decades. Even if you don’t believe in anthropogenic climate change, that the climate is changing currently and those changes are increasing fire danger globally is undeniable (at least by anyone who cares to live by facts).Here’s a scientific study showing that wildfires in the western United States are increasing in intensity due to global warming:
From the abstract:
Warmer temperatures and severe drought are driving increases in wildfire activity in the western United States, threatening forest ecosystems. However, identifying the influence of fire severity on tree cover loss (TCL) is challenging using commonly used categorical metrics. In this study, we quantify regional trends in wildfire-driven TCL as the product of annual burned area, average forest exposure (pre-fire tree cover), and average fire severity (relative loss of tree cover).
… recent changes in burned areas alone cannot explain observed tree cover trends. Linear regression analysis revealed that warmer summers and drier winters were significant drivers of increasing forest exposure, fire severity, and burned area (R2 from 0.54 to 0.80, p ⩽ 0.001), particularly in the northern forests. Climate extremes had a disproportionate impact on dense forests that were once more resistant to wildfire but now face risks from a shifting wildfire regime.
And even if you don't believe in anthropogenic climate change, that burning fossil fuel increases the carbon dioxide proportion of the mix of atmospheric gases is undeniable (at least by anyone who cares to live by facts).Even if you don’t believe in anthropogenic climate change, that the climate is changing currently and those changes are increasing fire danger globally is undeniable (at least by anyone who cares to live by facts).