Yes, YOU mostly certainly would be. Even after Theodore P. Wafer was convicted of murder, you insisted his (black) victim was at fault.
Yes, she did have a big share of the guilt. I would even say the majority.
She drank to excess (almost 3 times the legal limit at time of death), she crashed her car, she banged on the guy's door like a madwoman at 4am. She is not blameless, and that has nothing to do with her skin color.
You even used your code word "thug" to describe an innocent woman knocking on a door because her car broken down.
Did I? I do not recall using that word. In any case, then narrative of that case (as usual) was as misleading as claiming that Trayvon Martin died because he had Skittles.
- She wasn't knocking. She was banging. At 4 am.
- Her car did not break down. She crashed it because she was drunk (.22% BAC three hours after the crash)
- She wasn't looking for help either. There were three hours between the crash and the banging and she ignored offers of help by people who came to the scene. So what was she doing at his house demanding entry? What did she do between the crash and the banging?
You dug up every sniff of anything you could find on her to shift the blame, while NOT subjecting the CONVICTED shooter to the same scrutiny.
This is way beyond the sniff. It is correcting the complete misrepresentation of the case.
The jury CONVICTED the white man, but you still went on and on and on that he was perfectly justified in shooting her dead.
He says the shotgun went off accidentally. I do not think McBride deserved to die, but at the same time I do think he was justified investigating loud banging at his home in Detroit (very high crime rate) while armed. While she did not deserve to die, neither does he deserve to spend decades in prison.
Especially when premeditated, cold-blooded murderers like Mary Winkler only get 60 days.