I do think that the youth in Harvard will vote. I've heard that they read books there. And probably also newspapers.
I mean that they understand the essence of this election.
Massachusetts is a blue state, so whether or not they vote will not affect the election results. The real question is whether college voting in swing states will have any significant impact. Historically, it has not. However, youthful enthusiasts tend to play a big role in turning out the vote, just not among their own generation.
I remember when the first "youth movement" candidate was Eugene McCarthy (Minnesota Senator) in 1968. It was my first presidential election, and his primary campaign was so successful that Robert F Kennedy chose to step in and grab the youth vote away from him. Lyndon Johnson decided not to run, as a result of those challenges. After his assassination, Vice President Hubert Humphrey (the liberal "Happy Warrior", also from Minnesota) became the Democratic frontrunner. The youth vote faded away, because of Humphrey's association with support for the Vietnam war. I decided not to vote until a fellow student explained to me the consequences of Richard Nixon winning the election. I voted, but many of my generation simply turned off and dropped out. Nixon won.
Now we have Harris and Walz (also from Minnesota) campaigning on the "happy warrior" theme again. Harris got a lot of initial enthusiasm, but it faded somewhat because of her support for administration policy on the Israel-Palestine conflict. It is a toss-up right now over who will win, but I don't expect the youth vote to be much more significant now than it has in the past.