Search results for query: *

Let’s look that up So, to sum up - a policy that directed 10% of spending to be spent on 11.5% of the population makes the other 88.5% of the population who is receiving 90% of the spending into “Approved Racial Discrimination Targets” Your math is not mathing, and so your made up definition...

I agree. If anyone did this it would be an acto of terrorism, and Rightfully So. How is this different than placing land mines?

Retaliation, payback, vengeance, collective punishment, kill one of ours, we’ll kill twenty of yours. What a horrible, horrible way to live.

From bbc - the number of dead is low, it, it was the number of wounded - some, including more children, severely But of the dead, it looks like 50% children and healthcare workers? This is so cold. It’s like ambushing someone from cover in their own town. This beep is what made innocents...

I’m not following your conclusions here, Jimmy The collateral damage being reported is bigger than than what listed in this thread. And I cannot imagine what Israel thinks they will gain. They killed children by setting off bombs in places where they NO control - making it clear that they did...

You have a fascinating propensity to spend a lot of time engaging with things that don’t interest you. I usually skip those threads/comments. It would not have occurred to me to invest in them like you do. Fascinating. The observant reader will note that I did not call you any of those...

DARVO It is so interesting watching you evolve, TSwiz, from someone who was a libertarian to someone peddling paranoia theories. You used to converse about the issues and argue the merits. From a conservative standpoint, but at least you talked about real things. Anymore it’s just insults...

Your sarcasm is not “lost” on anyone (as I explained above.) You seem to suffer the delusion that because it’s sarcasm, it’s benign, or perhaps even funny, by definition. That’s objectively wrong. People have used sarcasm to wound others for millenia.

This. Murder is wrong, every time, for a lot of independently valid reasons. And asssassination of a political figure weakens society as a whole in a very immediate way. Protect that man so he can be trounced at the ballot box.

Damn it! (To these people with guns - ) STOP! Violence does not help society.

DARVO It’s interesting that you say that the whacking children comment is someone else’s fault. As if you were completely and utterly unconnected to the printing of it here. Schultz may have written it originally, but you brought it back to life. Your own choice. Can I detect sarcasm...

I feel a lot of the mystery involves what powers she has if she gains the presidency. Is it a landslide? Then she can do progressive things because progressives have shown her that she can do it without the blue dogs. Is it just barely a win? Then she can’t reach too high or she won’t even...

LOL, that’ll go well for him.

If you had read my message before responding, you would see what was meant. Obviously, you missed it by either not understanding or not bothering to read. Here; I’ll repost what is relevant Yah, none of us know who you are actually talking about. But if you want to remain the...

Some people think it’s okay to make sarcastic jokes about the abuse of children and are suprised when other people are not amused by it. It happens. Curious; do you have children? Do you whack them? Do you think it’s funny sarcasm to talk about whacking them? Would they think so?

Why not? Because you make no fucking sense. WTF is ukro-wehrmacht? No one knows who you are talking about. All your point-obscuring insults and name calling make it impossible to discern whether you are always talking about every-ukrainian-at-all-times, or a specific person, or a government...

I can see that it seems that way to you. I’m surprised, to be candid. There are some entertainers that I fawn over (Olga Korbut, Simone Biles, Jim Rice, Bobby Orr, Bonnie Raitt, Julia Child). Swift is not one of them. But, perhaps that all looks the same to you. It feels very very different...

LoL, me pointing out that she is, in fact, a billionaire based on sales, is a fact, not a love letter. She has managed to take over a billion dollars into her pocket from people who like what she is selling. I do not have to be one of those people to acknowledge this well known fact. Why would...

A wise man once said, So perhaps using violence to send a message is not the lesson you really want to teach. I found that asking the kids to think through what their behavior would result in did the trick, no need to treat them like badly treated dogs.

You haven’t shown that it is an “obsession,” at all. But really, this is not hard to figure out, and I’m surprised that it eludes you. It’s quite straightforward and simple. Let me spell it out: Campaigning and winning includes reaching an audience’s eyeballs with your message and getting...