Bowling Green: Never Forget!

[Angry Floof]

But that's not the case. They are being used, just less so due to technology.

Well, if they are not being used enough, they are not viable and will close.

And...? Does tearing down buildings mean there's no virtual libraries? Does it mean people aren't using libraries that you can't literally demolish? So since you won't answer the question of would you destroy libraries, would you destroy the information that libraries hold now that it's pretty much all digitally stored somewhere?

 

[Angry Floof]

Well, if they are not being used enough, they are not viable and will close.

Cheato has no use for them - why should YOU?

I saw that. I expected nothing more than gratuitous insults and wild speculation about insignificant "evidence," but it turns out it's quite compelling. Rather than demanding tax returns and divestiture, we should be asking the fucker to prove he can read something more challenging than a tweet!

 

[TSwizzle]

Well, if they are not being used enough, they are not viable and will close.

And...? Does tearing down buildings mean there's no virtual libraries?

People just don't use libraries as much these days. Or post offices. Or banks etc. I'm sure the buildings can be used for something else.

 

[Elixir]

And...? Does tearing down buildings mean there's no virtual libraries?

People just don't use libraries as much these days. Or post offices. Or banks etc. I'm sure the buildings can be used for something else.

You are a person, not "people". I use the post office every weekday. They are keeping UPS and Fed-Ex honest; I use USPS for a couple hundred packages a day on average, by the grace of rate comparison software. I am also physically at the bank(s) at least twice a week.

Take the library if you must ("Cyber" isn't as tough for most of us as it is for Cheato), but please leave the infrastructure upon which my business depends.

 

[Angry Floof]

And...? Does tearing down buildings mean there's no virtual libraries?

People just don't use libraries as much these days. Or post offices. Or banks etc. I'm sure the buildings can be used for something else.

That wasn't the question, though. Would you destroy our ability to get mail to each other? Would you destroy our means to banks and economic tools?

Here is the question again, as asked, " would you destroy the information that libraries hold now that it's pretty much all digitally stored somewhere?"

 

[TSwizzle]

People just don't use libraries as much these days. Or post offices. Or banks etc. I'm sure the buildings can be used for something else.

That wasn't the question, though. Would you destroy our ability to get mail to each other? Would you destroy our means to banks and economic tools?

As far as I am aware, if a library (or post office or branch of a bank etc) closes, the building and its contents are not destroyed.

 

[Angry Floof]

That wasn't the question, though. Would you destroy our ability to get mail to each other? Would you destroy our means to banks and economic tools?

As far as I am aware, if a library (or post office or branch of a bank etc) closes, the building and its contents are not destroyed.

Are you taking courses at your local scientology org? You're nailing the no-answer technique. I mean, it's not working, but many of the "skills" they learn don't. You just really sound like you took lessons there.

The question was, "Would you destroy the content of libraries, digital or not?"

 

[TSwizzle]

The question was, "Would you destroy the content of libraries, digital or not?"

Would you destroy the bank notes if a bank branch closed its doors ? Would you destroy all the stamps in a post office that has been closed down ? Would you destroy all the food in a grocery store (e.g. Fresh and Easy) if it went out of business ?

 

[Angry Floof]

The question was, "Would you destroy the content of libraries, digital or not?"

Would you destroy the bank notes if a bank branch closed its doors ? Would you destroy all the stamps in a post office that has been closed down ? Would you destroy all the food in a grocery store (e.g. Fresh and Easy) if it went out of business ?

:laughing-smiley-014 No, I wouldn't. But we're not talking about my views of the contents of libraries. I'm asking about yours.

Let's try something else. In your opinion, should the contents of libraries, whether digital or books on shelves, be protected from attempts to destroy it?

 

[Elixir]

The question was, "Would you destroy the content of libraries, digital or not?"

Would you destroy the bank notes if a bank branch closed its doors ? Would you destroy all the stamps in a post office that has been closed down ? Would you destroy all the food in a grocery store (e.g. Fresh and Easy) if it went out of business ?

WHOOSH! Why so afraid to answer a simple question, Swizzle?
"Would you destroy the content of libraries, digital or not?"

 

[TSwizzle]

Would you destroy the bank notes if a bank branch closed its doors ? Would you destroy all the stamps in a post office that has been closed down ? Would you destroy all the food in a grocery store (e.g. Fresh and Easy) if it went out of business ?

:laughing-smiley-014 No, I wouldn't. But we're not talking about my views of the contents of libraries. I'm asking about yours.

Let's try something else. In your opinion, should the contents of libraries, whether digital or books on shelves, be protected from attempts to destroy it?

Look, stop fucking about and make your point.

 

[Angry Floof]

No, I wouldn't. But we're not talking about my views of the contents of libraries. I'm asking about yours.

Let's try something else. In your opinion, should the contents of libraries, whether digital or books on shelves, be protected from attempts to destroy it?

Look, stop fucking about and make your point.

:laughing-smiley-014

Maybe "answer the fucking question" is the point? Holy shit.

Do you think the contents of our libraries should be protected from destruction? I'm not asking if the contents are printed on paper or stored on digital media. I'm asking if you think that information is valuable to all people and should be protected?

 

[RavenSky]

Reuters - Kuwait denies it imposed travel ban praised by Trump

Well there goes that trumpster excuse...

- - - Updated - - -

She misspoke...twice

..in an interview with Cosmopolitan.com conducted by phone days earlier, on Sunday, Jan. 29, Conway used the same phrasing, claiming that President Barack Obama called for a temporary "ban on Iraqi refugees” after the “Bowling Green massacre.”

...

"He did, it’s a fact," she said of Obama. "Why did he do that? He did that for exactly the same reasons. He did that because two Iraqi nationals came to this country, joined ISIS, traveled back to the Middle East to get trained and refine their terrorism skills, and come back here, and were the masterminds behind the Bowling Green massacre of taking innocent soldiers' lives away."

Just so we're clear, then. She made up a fake massacre, trotted it out not once but twice, and only retracted it when she got caught.

but it wasn't a lie

 

[TSwizzle]

Look, stop fucking about and make your point.

Maybe "answer the fucking question" is the point?

Either make your point, if indeed you actually have point to make, otherwise jog on.

 

[Angry Floof]

Maybe "answer the fucking question" is the point?

Either make your point, if indeed you actually have point to make, otherwise jog on.

You know what the point is, and that's why you are so adamant in not answering the question.

 

[TSwizzle]

Either make your point, if indeed you actually have point to make, otherwise jog on.

You know what the point is, and that's why you are so adamant in not answering the question.

Jog on it is then.

 

[Angry Floof]

You know what the point is, and that's why you are so adamant in not answering the question.

Jog on it is then.

I suspect your answer would be similar to Betsy DeVos'.

 

[Elixir]

Maybe "answer the fucking question" is the point?

Either make your point, if indeed you actually have point to make, otherwise jog on.

The point has become this: Right wing trolls are unable to answer simple binary questions. Thank you for helping make it - in spades.
- - jogging on...

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Either make your point, if indeed you actually have point to make, otherwise jog on.

You know what the point is, and that's why you are so adamant in not answering the question.

Dude, can't you let a poster take a shit on the thread in peace?

 

[laughing dog]

Maybe "answer the fucking question" is the point?

Either make your point, if indeed you actually have point to make, otherwise jog on.

Congratulations on winning the most ironic post of the month.