Abso-fuckin-lutely...Biden really should have stuck to his pledge to be a one term proposition, and spent the last 3 years preparing Harris as a successor.
Abso-fuckin-lutely...Biden really should have stuck to his pledge to be a one term proposition, and spent the last 3 years preparing Harris as a successor.
Damn Democrat election stealingUm … the vote percentages add up to more than 117 percent?
It's not voting multiple times, but ability to vote for more than one person. At the time of this writing, there have been 18 votes cast by 14 people. It's not that 4 people voted twice, but that e.g. 4 people liked two of the options and selected both.But there is also an option to change your vote, so no reason to vote multiple times.
Well he is. One drop rule is racist, and we should not be erasing one half of a person ancestry just because of political correctness.When Obama was elected, I knew people who were all ‘he’s half white so…’.
Not a real problem. One of them just has to move before the election, as Dick Cheney did in 2020 for this very reason.Swalwell is from the same state so shouldn't be in the poll.
AOC is way too left for a national ticket anyway.I think AOC is running for Schumer's job when he retires.
My main concern is her trying to shut down a pipeline.Whitmer is term limited, so I don't see the risk.
Some cabinet post?Not suggesting Porter as VP but she needs to be in a prominent position.
LMAO!If you want to blow some minds, how about AOC? Very very smart, articulate, east coast, working class.
With this attitude, is it any wonder Dems are doing poorly with white men? Your attitude is basically "men (especially straight white men) need not apply".Let’s own the female/POC thing!
So not picking a woman as running mate is "misogyny"? "No men need apply" in order not to be a misogynist? Really?Of course I know that bypassing Whitmer is largely based on misogyny.
Gender certainly matters to you. You want a two woman ticket.Neither gender nor geography should matter but they do.
On the contrary, saying that there should be an all woman ticket and that men should not be considered is misandry. Dems are already strong with women, but are hurting with men. This dismissive attitude toward half of the population is not going to help.As I noted before, I think owning the female ticket works better than the female lead on the ticket. The idea we need to balance the ticket via gender reinforces the misogyny.
Why do you think a running mate from MI helps in PA, but a running mate from PA does not help in MI?We are in a unique situation, historically. And Trump just trashes general political rules and decorum. So, this to me is a perfect time for a Harris-Whitmer candidacy. Shoring up Michigan, I think helps Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, while as shoring Pennsylvania just shores up Pennsylvania.
I am in complete agreement with you. I've read a lot about him. The fact that a moderate Democrat could win and is popular in a very conservative state means a lot. He could draw in the double haters, the independents who might think Harris is too liberal and the former Trumpers who want to vote for someone who is a moderate. I think he'd be a great match for Harris. I'm surprised some of my other political junkie posters aren't familiar with him. Most of those on the list aren't the well known.Andy Beshear.
What even does "Hillary Rodham Clinton gay" mean? I thought you meant Human Rights Campaign in the sense that they are not radical enough for you.Ah, basic political literacy. I was beginning to doubt the voting credentials of everyone in this thread, not recognizing the name of their own presidential pick 7 years ago, whose name is also helpfully reprinted in the poll above.
No, I want a world where gender does not affect a person’s ability to hold high office, in this case, POTUS.So not picking a woman as running mate is "misogyny"? "No men need apply" in order not to be a misogynist? Really?Of course I know that bypassing Whitmer is largely based on misogyny.
Gender certainly matters to you. You want a two woman ticket.Neither gender nor geography should matter but they do.
I've demonstrated the geographic and electoral benefit of Whitmer being on the ticket and Harris being on the ticket. I have not suggested the ticket has to be all female, rather I'm suggesting it could be possible to reduce the misogyny with it being all-female.On the contrary, saying that there should be an all woman ticket and that men should not be considered is misandry.As I noted before, I think owning the female ticket works better than the female lead on the ticket. The idea we need to balance the ticket via gender reinforces the misogyny.
Putting a male running mate with Harris going to swing the male vote?Dems are already strong with women, but are hurting with men.
The only person being dismissive is you because you aren't even reading posts within any sense of context other than your own bias.This dismissive attitude toward half of the population is not going to help.
PA is in the Northeast. Michigan is in the Midwest. The average Midwestern voter is more conservative than the average Northeast voter.Why do you think a running mate from MI helps in PA, but a running mate from PA does not help in MI?We are in a unique situation, historically. And Trump just trashes general political rules and decorum. So, this to me is a perfect time for a Harris-Whitmer candidacy. Shoring up Michigan, I think helps Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, while as shoring Pennsylvania just shores up Pennsylvania.
She certainly positioned herself as one in 2019, including her cockamamie support for banning fracking and offshore drilling. She also wrongly (and libelously) claimed that Michael Brown was "murdered". How much of that nonsense she really believes that is another question.Harris is progressive. She supports Medicare for All,
Well, only in one aspect of their bodily autonomy.the rights of women to have bodily autonomy,
That was always a silly attack. What should she have done as a prosecutor? Only prosecute white suspects?help for the economically lower classes etc. Just because she was a prosecutor, doesn't mean she hates minorities.
Prosecutors have a great deal of discretion regarding charging decisions and plea bargains.Some idiot on WaPo said she was responsible for putting people away for decades. Judges sentence people, not prosecutors
Well, she is pretty tenacious with RICO cases against both Young Thug (Jeffery Williams) and Old Thug (Donald Trump).and Georgia's own Fanni Willis is also very tough on crime, yet she is very popular in very liberal Fulton county.
Mayor Pete did pretty well in 2020. If he could win over the hayseeds of Iowa, I do not think Michigan, Pennsylvania or Wisconsin will be too much of a problem.As far as Pete B goes, it's not just the fact that our bigoted country isn't ready for a gay VP. I read an article last year, that gave evidence that it's almost impossible for a short man to win the presidency in the US, and probably other places as well.
It sure sounded to me like you were advocating for an all-female ticket.I've demonstrated the geographic and electoral benefit of Whitmer being on the ticket and Harris being on the ticket. I have not suggested the ticket has to be all female, rather I'm suggesting it could be possible to reduce the misogyny with it being all-female.
It would reduce the perception that Dems are ignoring men, especially white men.Putting a male running mate with Harris going to swing the male vote?
That does not explain why the electoral help would be unidirectional.PA is in the Northeast. Michigan is in the Midwest. The average Midwestern voter is more conservative than the average Northeast voter.
I know you don’t quite grasp but until 2020, there were ZERO women as VP or POTUS. Until 2008, there were ZERO persons of color as POTUS or VP.Some cabinet post?Not suggesting Porter as VP but she needs to be in a prominent position.
LMAO!If you want to blow some minds, how about AOC? Very very smart, articulate, east coast, working class.
With this attitude, is it any wonder Dems are doing poorly with white men? Your attitude is basically "men (especially straight white men) need not apply".Let’s own the female/POC thing!