• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Europe submits voluntarily

Status
Not open for further replies.
FFS. There's been well over 30.00 Islamic terrorist attacks world wide,just since 9/11.

Now a white supremacist has Struck at a mosque killing 50 and injuring another 20 or so in New Zealand.

Had that being 50 Christian victims of islam in say, Egypt. It wouldn't even make the 6pm news!
 
FFS. There's been well over 30.00 Islamic terrorist attacks world wide,just since 9/11.

Now a white supremacist has Struck at a mosque killing 50 and injuring another 20 or so in New Zealand.

Had that being 50 Christian victims of islam in say, Egypt. It wouldn't even make the 6pm news!

Aren't you the one who insists that every Muslim everywhere is complicit every time one Muslim commits an atrocity anywhere on the planet? At least until and unless they sign up on this forum to specifically express their condemnation to you personally in a pm? (Public statements aren't good enough, we've been through this).

By your own "logic", your lack of condemnation of this atrocity by a white supremacist islamophobic Australian (a person with whom you have much more in common than 99% of Muslims ever had with any Islamist terrorist) makes you more than complicit.
 
FFS. There's been well over 30.00 Islamic terrorist attacks world wide,just since 9/11.

Now a white supremacist has Struck at a mosque killing 50 and injuring another 20 or so in New Zealand.

Had that being 50 Christian victims of islam in say, Egypt. It wouldn't even make the 6pm news!

Aren't you the one who insists that every Muslim everywhere is complicit every time one Muslim commits an atrocity anywhere on the planet? At least until and unless they sign up on this forum to specifically express their condemnation to you personally in a pm? (Public statements aren't good enough, we've been through this).

By your own "logic", your lack of condemnation of this atrocity by a white supremacist islamophobic Australian (a person with whom you have much more in common than 99% of Muslims ever had with any Islamist terrorist) makes you more than complicit.


No, his point was that since this attack made the news, it's unfair. The reaction should be "white supremacist commits mass murder? No harm, no foul. Now let's get back to talking about how the Muslims are taking over Europe!"

The fact that this shooter was allegedly inspired by Anders Brevik and his quest to rid Europe of Muslims by any means possible is just incidental. The real problem is the Muslims. Never forget!
 
FFS. There's been well over 30.00 Islamic terrorist attacks world wide,just since 9/11.

Now a white supremacist has Struck at a mosque killing 50 and injuring another 20 or so in New Zealand.

Had that being 50 Christian victims of islam in say, Egypt. It wouldn't even make the 6pm news!

Aren't you the one who insists that every Muslim everywhere is complicit every time one Muslim commits an atrocity anywhere on the planet? At least until and unless they sign up on this forum to specifically express their condemnation to you personally in a pm? (Public statements aren't good enough, we've been through this).

By your own "logic", your lack of condemnation of this atrocity by a white supremacist islamophobic Australian (a person with whom you have much more in common than 99% of Muslims ever had with any Islamist terrorist) makes you more than complicit.

You have to work really hard to find a mosque that doesn't condemn an Islamic terrorist attack every time it happens. But it's not news so nobody reports on it. So it's a silly demand that racists keep making.
 
FFS. There's been well over 30.00 Islamic terrorist attacks world wide,just since 9/11.

Now a white supremacist has Struck at a mosque killing 50 and injuring another 20 or so in New Zealand.

Had that being 50 Christian victims of islam in say, Egypt. It wouldn't even make the 6pm news!

Aren't you the one who insists that every Muslim everywhere is complicit every time one Muslim commits an atrocity anywhere on the planet? At least until and unless they sign up on this forum to specifically express their condemnation to you personally in a pm? (Public statements aren't good enough, we've been through this).

By your own "logic", your lack of condemnation of this atrocity by a white supremacist islamophobic Australian (a person with whom you have much more in common than 99% of Muslims ever had with any Islamist terrorist) makes you more than complicit.

We are all horrified by this needless death of 50 brain washed people. All people who think there's an invisible big daddy in the sky looking after them, are either purely delusional, or just downright victims of brainwashing from a very young age.

But please answer this: How many people know that in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa in the past two decades alone, tens of thousands of xtians have been similarly butchered in churches and their homes by islamic terrorists?
 
Not to mention the butchering of thousands in Western nations. There were 3000, including a few muslims slaughtered in New York alone on 9/11.
 
German prosecutors arrest 10 suspects over Islamist attack plan
Deutsche Welle said:
The main suspects were a 21-year old man from Offenbach and two 31-year-old brothers from Wiesbaden, all associated with the local Islamist Salafist community. All are German citizens. The number of confirmed Islamists in the state of Hesse in 2017 was 4,170, including 1,650 Salafists.
[..]
According to the initial investigation, the accused were planning to use a vehicle and firearms to kill as many "unbelievers" as possible. They had rented a large vehicle, made contact with weapons dealers, and started to raise funds.

More evidence of failed European migration policies.
 
FFS. There's been well over 30.00 Islamic terrorist attacks world wide,just since 9/11.

Now a white supremacist has Struck at a mosque killing 50 and injuring another 20 or so in New Zealand.

Had that being 50 Christian victims of islam in say, Egypt. It wouldn't even make the 6pm news!

Aren't you the one who insists that every Muslim everywhere is complicit every time one Muslim commits an atrocity anywhere on the planet? At least until and unless they sign up on this forum to specifically express their condemnation to you personally in a pm? (Public statements aren't good enough, we've been through this).

By your own "logic", your lack of condemnation of this atrocity by a white supremacist islamophobic Australian (a person with whom you have much more in common than 99% of Muslims ever had with any Islamist terrorist) makes you more than complicit.

You have to work really hard to find a mosque that doesn't condemn an Islamic terrorist attack every time it happens. But it's not news so nobody reports on it. So it's a silly demand that racists keep making.

Yes. Good point. How would we know if mosques do or don't condemn acts of Islamic terror if it is almost never reported on when they do?
 

I have no fundamental problem with this. I think the EU should take in any country, anywhere that will make it stronger. But that's the problem here. Somalia is a political basket case. Created by the cold war. Siad Barre was the worst example of a communist dictator propped up with USSR. Exceedingly weak, even with Soviet support. When USSR folded the Somali communist regime folded together with it. Since Barre's main method of ruling was to crush anybody able to threaten his power, this led to a godawful mess when Barre was ousted. International interventions had mixed results. But they now seem to be getting their shit together. It's too early to say that it's democratic and stable. But they might be. There's hope.

While Somalia is not a EU contender for many years to come, I've heard plenty of good things about it's potential. Africa is the new centre for explosive economic growth. This is going to lift all the boats. Even in Somalia. So yeah... go go Somalia.
 
You have to work really hard to find a mosque that doesn't condemn an Islamic terrorist attack every time it happens. But it's not news so nobody reports on it. So it's a silly demand that racists keep making.

Yes. Good point. How would we know if mosques do or don't condemn acts of Islamic terror if it is almost never reported on when they do?

Each mosque has their own website. There's Islamic organisations in every western country. These will list them as well as having a notice of condemnation. I've also seen prepared press-kits where condemnations are written and signed by every Western imam, complete with links. I've posted a couple in this thread. But good luck finding them. My impression is that condemnations of terror is now routinely done every time anything happens. The cynic might say it's just so as they can say they they do condemn it if anybody questions them on it. Because it's become a common hang up among anti-Islamists in the west. But they're still doing it.
 
Increasingly it is Bangladeshis who are coming to EU illegally and fraudulently claiming asylum so they can stay indefinitely.
Pursuit of dream ends in tragedy
Daily Star said:
Alamin, then a private university student, says he found it difficult to get a job or do business in Bangladesh. So, he decided to go to Italy and build a career.
No war. No prosecution. Just "difficult to get a job".

It's all about money:
In several phases, his family had to pay around Tk 11 lakh before he was put on an Italy-bound ship last Thursday night. In mid-sea, he along with others was shifted to a small boat.
“Bangladesh embassy officials are asking me if I would return home. But tell me how can I return home now? My parents are heavily in debt,” he said.
ASM Ashraful Islam, labour counsellor of Bangladesh Embassy in Libya, last week said they relocated some 300 Bangladeshis to safe places from the risky suburbs of Tripoli as violence escalated in the Libyan capital and its surroundings early April.
The embassy announced arrangements of voluntary repatriation but only 50 of them accepted the offer.
“Others said they don’t want to return home because they spent huge sums to reach there,” he told The Daily Star.
These families are getting in debt to finance their sons' voyages to Europe because they are hoping these sons (once they fraudulently claim asylum) will start sending money back. An investment fueled by dysfunctional EU migration policies.
According to Zaid Bakht, former research director of Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, some two million youths join the labour force in Bangladesh every year.

But only about 60 percent of them are absorbed into domestic and foreign labour markets. The rest remain either unemployed or underemployed and often become desperate to find jobs abroad.
How about investing in birth control rather than exporting your surplus population?

Since there is no war or persecution in Bangladesh, all Bangladeshis illegally arriving in Europe need to be deported immediately. No allowing them to claim asylum and then allowing them to stay indefinitely, as that is their strategy. You make that strategy unworkable and there will be no incentive for more and more Bangladeshis to attempt to do the same.
 
Pathological altruism will be the death of Europe.

Out of the liberal policy morass? How Denmark’s Social Democrats might reshape the country’s approach to immigration

D7iSJoUWsAAEBMr.jpg


Immigrations and Public Finances in Finland

D7ihaaxXoAANEC8.png

D7ihaaLWkAI2Zss.png
 
Pathological Altruism....a very good term.

I remember a migrant during the surge in Europe being interviewed in Germany. He said he was not staying in Germany and was headed somewhere else because over there they 'take care of everything'. It might have been Denmark or Sweden I do not member.

We have the same problem with unrealistic altruism. There are those who think we have to deal with an increasing stream of immigrants with little education, poor English skills, and no skills.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom