How do you figure that? Don't worry, Max, she is going to get the culprits. You seem awful okay with the the cops killing Freddie. Why is that? Why is this prosecutor a disgrace? Because you do not believe in justice for black people when they are abused by cops. It is your attitude that the BLM movement is responding to. The fact that there are a lot of white people who share your thinking is the problem. This guy Freddie was killed. You seem to be forgetting that...as if it should be a normal event for cops to break a black guy's back then ignore him in his death throes. Do you know if Freddie actually committed any particular crime to get himself arrested? Or was his main crime just being black, poor, and uneducated?
You gave us a paragraph of baloney marinated in moonshine. "My attitude" is old fashioned, that the law is not a pull it from your ass invention by race charged lynch mobs and police-hating ideologues, but is an objective rule that the prosecutor is obligated to support as an officer of the court. A part of that obligation is to do so in support of legal justice, by following the standards of professional conduct in our legal traditions, our ethical codes, and the law.
So Mosby is a disgrace for fairly obvious reasons, which have nothing to do with your racially obsessed memes. It is impractical to paraphrase all the widespread criticism of Mosby in the legal community, so here is a sampling from a former prosecutor and legal ethics specialist:
Nonetheless, Mosby’s announcement and related statements from the steps of Baltimore’s War Memorial Building were unethical, and indeed constituted a professional ethics breach:
Mosby said she told Gray’s family that “no one is above the law and I would pursue justice upon their behalf.” Unethical. Her client isn’t the family. Her client is the state. If the evidence appears too weak to get a conviction based on any new revelations, her duty to her client, which only requires justice, not justice for any party, would be to drop the case. Telling the family that she is working “on their behalf” is either a lie, or, if true, unethical. She is not their lawyer or the victim’s lawyer.
“I heard your call for ‘no justice, no peace,'” she said. “Your peace is sincerely needed as I work to deliver justice on behalf of this young man.”
Ugh. Again the “on behalf of” misstatement. Worse, though, is “I heard your call for ‘no justice, no peace.” What are we to take from this statement, other than the disgraceful admission that the indictment is in response to mob violence and threats of more? She may not say that. By saying it, she has undermined the rule of law. Prosecutors must not”hear” demands that a citizen be prosecuted, or not prosecuted. They are ethically obligated to ignore them, and do what the evidence dictates.
The demonstrators obviously got her meaning. Desmond Taylor, 29, shouted to the crowd, “This day means that your actions bring consequences in Baltimore City.”
Imagine what else riots and arson might bring!
The blog writer is a former prosecutor and legal ethics expert. His extended observations include her conflict of interests, her violation of the Maryland Rule Of Professional Conduct Rule 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor by making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused, etc.
Arkirk, I am sure you won't read the link, but here it is for the less blindered:
http://ethicsalarms.com/2015/05/01/...garding-charges-in-the-death-of-freddie-gray/
AND for an extended treatment on her unethical "character", see below.
In a legal ethics seminar I taught this week for government attorneys, the vast majority of them voted that Marilyn Mosby’s vainglorious announcement of charges against six officers in the death of Freddie Gray was prosecutorial abuse, and a blatant violation of professional ethics rule 3.8, which directs that (this is the Maryland version)…
http://ethicsalarms.com/2015/06/26/the-most-unethical-prosecutor-of-all-baltimores-marilyn-mosby/
Need I say more?