• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Merged Gaza just launched an unprovoked attack on Israel

To denote when two or more threads have been merged
Sure, and Ukraine needs to get used to unprovoked Russian militray occupation and colonization, and learn to like it.
Ukraine is more like Israel. And Russia like Iran and its proxies. Think about it. Both want to destroy the other. Russia thinks Ukraine belongs to it by rights, and Iran wants to destroy Israel and replace it with an Arab, Muslim "Palestine". They both also love attacking civilians.
Look at a map of Israel. Palestinians are herd into small areas of Gaza and the West Bank. The militray occupation in the West Bank is slowly pushing Palestinians off their land. They are in the way of Israeli progress.
They could have had 97% or so of the "West Bank" had they accepted the peace deal offered to them by Barak and not decided to start the second intifada instead.
Show us the offer.

Show us the proposed boundaries and how they encompassed 97% of the West Bank.

Show us Barak's offer to formally recognize that area as the Palestinian State.

Don't just spin a yarn about how wonderful Ehud Barak's offer was. And don't try to sweep Yitzak Rabin's offer under the rug. Rabin offered to follow the Oslo Accords and was denounced and murdered for it. If you want to convince us that Barak's offer was a better deal for the Palestinians, or even something close to comparable, you'll have to do more than merely proclaim it.
It doesn't even matter what was in the offer. If he didn't like it he could have made a counter offer. He didn't.

It matters what was in the offer.

It matters because (here's the tricky part) if the offer was a shit sandwich then turning it down was reasonable, justifiable, and predictable.

What was the offer Ehud Barak made as a replacement for the Oslo Accords?

And, as has been pointed out numerous times and supported by links to credible sources, Arafat's counter offer was "we stick to the plan our representatives negotiated."

The Israelis wanted a different plan because following the one outlined in the Oslo Accords is what got Rabin killed. The Palestinians wanted either the plan outlined by the Accords or something better. Perfectly understandable on both sides.
Whenever Israel offers concessions, Palestinians respond with violence. Even this latest war Hamas started in a most horrific way comes at the heels of Israel agreeing to let thousands of Gazans to work inside Israel.
What concessions has Israel offered?

If it's "We'll stop murdering you if you stop resisting our efforts to drive you out of Palestine", then yeah, the Palestinians have responded to that one with violence.
Israel pulled entirely out of Gaza, there's no driving out going on.
What concessions has Israel offered, Loren?

You and Derec are using the plural form so you must think there was more than one.

List them.
 
Last edited:
Sure, and Ukraine needs to get used to unprovoked Russian militray occupation and colonization, and learn to like it.
Ukraine is more like Israel. And Russia like Iran and its proxies. Think about it. Both want to destroy the other. Russia thinks Ukraine belongs to it by rights, and Iran wants to destroy Israel and replace it with an Arab, Muslim "Palestine". They both also love attacking civilians.
Look at a map of Israel. Palestinians are herd into small areas of Gaza and the West Bank. The militray occupation in the West Bank is slowly pushing Palestinians off their land. They are in the way of Israeli progress.
They could have had 97% or so of the "West Bank" had they accepted the peace deal offered to them by Barak and not decided to start the second intifada instead.
Show us the offer.

Show us the proposed boundaries and how they encompassed 97% of the West Bank.

Show us Barak's offer to formally recognize that area as the Palestinian State.

Don't just spin a yarn about how wonderful Ehud Barak's offer was. And don't try to sweep Yitzak Rabin's offer under the rug. Rabin offered to follow the Oslo Accords and was denounced and murdered for it. If you want to convince us that Barak's offer was a better deal for the Palestinians, or even something close to comparable, you'll have to do more than merely proclaim it.
It doesn't even matter what was in the offer. If he didn't like it he could have made a counter offer. He didn't.

It matters what was in the offer.

It matters because (here's the tricky part) if the offer was a shit sandwich then turning it down was reasonable, justifiable, and predictable.

What was the offer Ehud Barak made as a replacement for the Oslo Accords?

And, as has been pointed out numerous times and supported by links to credible sources, Arafat's counter offer was "we stick to the plan our representatives negotiated."

The Israelis wanted a different plan because following the one outlined in the Oslo Accords is what got Rabin killed. The Palestinians wanted either the plan outlined by the Accords or something better. Perfectly understandable on both sides.
Whenever Israel offers concessions, Palestinians respond with violence. Even this latest war Hamas started in a most horrific way comes at the heels of Israel agreeing to let thousands of Gazans to work inside Israel.
What concessions has Israel offered?

If it's "We'll stop murdering you if you stop resisting our efforts to drive you out of Palestine", then yeah, the Palestinians have responded to that one with violence.
Israel pulled entirely out of Gaza, there's no driving out going on.
What concessions has Israel offered, Loren?

You and Derec are using the plural form so you must think there was more than one.

List them.
What kind of concessions do you think Israel should offer, having been the victim of a brutal attack?

I know there’s long history of enmity between Israel and Palestine. But Hamas is a terrorist organization which attacked Israel without warning. There has been grave wrong in the part of Israel and grave wrong on the part of Palestine prior to the recent attack by Hamas. I cannot see how Israel now owes Hamas concessions for a brutal surprise attack.
 
Sure, and Ukraine needs to get used to unprovoked Russian militray occupation and colonization, and learn to like it.
Ukraine is more like Israel. And Russia like Iran and its proxies. Think about it. Both want to destroy the other. Russia thinks Ukraine belongs to it by rights, and Iran wants to destroy Israel and replace it with an Arab, Muslim "Palestine". They both also love attacking civilians.
Look at a map of Israel. Palestinians are herd into small areas of Gaza and the West Bank. The militray occupation in the West Bank is slowly pushing Palestinians off their land. They are in the way of Israeli progress.
They could have had 97% or so of the "West Bank" had they accepted the peace deal offered to them by Barak and not decided to start the second intifada instead.
Show us the offer.

Show us the proposed boundaries and how they encompassed 97% of the West Bank.

Show us Barak's offer to formally recognize that area as the Palestinian State.

Don't just spin a yarn about how wonderful Ehud Barak's offer was. And don't try to sweep Yitzak Rabin's offer under the rug. Rabin offered to follow the Oslo Accords and was denounced and murdered for it. If you want to convince us that Barak's offer was a better deal for the Palestinians, or even something close to comparable, you'll have to do more than merely proclaim it.
It doesn't even matter what was in the offer. If he didn't like it he could have made a counter offer. He didn't.

It matters what was in the offer.

It matters because (here's the tricky part) if the offer was a shit sandwich then turning it down was reasonable, justifiable, and predictable.

What was the offer Ehud Barak made as a replacement for the Oslo Accords?

And, as has been pointed out numerous times and supported by links to credible sources, Arafat's counter offer was "we stick to the plan our representatives negotiated."

The Israelis wanted a different plan because following the one outlined in the Oslo Accords is what got Rabin killed. The Palestinians wanted either the plan outlined by the Accords or something better. Perfectly understandable on both sides.
Whenever Israel offers concessions, Palestinians respond with violence. Even this latest war Hamas started in a most horrific way comes at the heels of Israel agreeing to let thousands of Gazans to work inside Israel.
What concessions has Israel offered?

If it's "We'll stop murdering you if you stop resisting our efforts to drive you out of Palestine", then yeah, the Palestinians have responded to that one with violence.
Israel pulled entirely out of Gaza, there's no driving out going on.
What concessions has Israel offered, Loren?

You and Derec are using the plural form so you must think there was more than one.

List them.
What kind of concessions do you think Israel should offer, having been the victim of a brutal attack?

I don't think Israel should make concessions to Hamas.

That does not mean Israel should be given free rein to starve, bomb, and brutalize the civilians of Gaza. It should not be allowed to deny them water. But I firmly believe Israel should want peacemakers to succeed in bringing prosperity to Palestinians who have chosen to forswear violence, which means rewarding Abbas and Fatah with major improvements in Palestinian communities and recognition of Palestinian rights. And IMO Israel should insist on having the PA be the go-between negotiators for Gaza, at least until the current spate of fighting dies down.

The biggest problem with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is that people who don't fight back against Israel's expansion have their land stolen, their orchards and farms ruined, and their livelihoods destroyed, while people who do fight back have the exact same thing happen only quicker. We can all see the incentive to be violent but where is the incentive to be peaceful?

Years ago, the PA offered major concessions on Jerusalem and the settlements. This was after it formally recognized the Right of Israel to exist and the Right of Jewish immigrants to live there. I think it's time Israel offered a few major concessions as well, starting with recognizing the Right of Palestinians to remain in their homes in Palestine. Honestly, I don't believe Israel will be doing that anytime soon. The settlers have the upper hand in Israeli society and the Knesset. The violence they commit has been on the increase since 2022
but arrests and prosecutions for those acts of violence haven't.

I know there’s long history of enmity between Israel and Palestine. But Hamas is a terrorist organization which attacked Israel without warning. There has been grave wrong in the part of Israel and grave wrong on the part of Palestine prior to the recent attack by Hamas. I cannot see how Israel now owes Hamas concessions for a brutal surprise attack.

Do you honestly think the IDF and Hamas have been warning each other about impending attacks before this one?
 

‘I went through hell:’ Released Hamas hostage describes being kidnapped and taken into tunnel system​


While I do not in the least think this justifies anything at all by Hamas, I do think this is an interesting nuance to the story that I had not yet heard:
Lifshitz also accused the Israel Defense Forces and Shin Bet intelligence service of not taking threats from Hamas “seriously” and said the costly Gaza border fence erected by Israel had done nothing to protect her community from Hamas’ attack.

“The lack of awareness by Shin Bet and the IDF hurt us a lot,” she stressed. “They warned us three weeks beforehand, they burned fields, they sent fire balloons and the IDF did not treat it seriously,” she continued.

Another interesting thing is that the hostages might be in the tunnels. Certainly, some of them were in the tunnels and this is below the north or at least not in the south. So if ground troops go in, presumably they'd do some urban warfare and then invade the tunnels. But if there is major bombing by both sides, the tunnels could be destroyed in the process.
 
Sure, and Ukraine needs to get used to unprovoked Russian militray occupation and colonization, and learn to like it.
Ukraine is more like Israel. And Russia like Iran and its proxies. Think about it. Both want to destroy the other. Russia thinks Ukraine belongs to it by rights, and Iran wants to destroy Israel and replace it with an Arab, Muslim "Palestine". They both also love attacking civilians.
Look at a map of Israel. Palestinians are herd into small areas of Gaza and the West Bank. The militray occupation in the West Bank is slowly pushing Palestinians off their land. They are in the way of Israeli progress.
They could have had 97% or so of the "West Bank" had they accepted the peace deal offered to them by Barak and not decided to start the second intifada instead.
Show us the offer.

Show us the proposed boundaries and how they encompassed 97% of the West Bank.

Show us Barak's offer to formally recognize that area as the Palestinian State.

Don't just spin a yarn about how wonderful Ehud Barak's offer was. And don't try to sweep Yitzak Rabin's offer under the rug. Rabin offered to follow the Oslo Accords and was denounced and murdered for it. If you want to convince us that Barak's offer was a better deal for the Palestinians, or even something close to comparable, you'll have to do more than merely proclaim it.
It doesn't even matter what was in the offer. If he didn't like it he could have made a counter offer. He didn't.

It matters what was in the offer.

It matters because (here's the tricky part) if the offer was a shit sandwich then turning it down was reasonable, justifiable, and predictable.

What was the offer Ehud Barak made as a replacement for the Oslo Accords?

And, as has been pointed out numerous times and supported by links to credible sources, Arafat's counter offer was "we stick to the plan our representatives negotiated."

The Israelis wanted a different plan because following the one outlined in the Oslo Accords is what got Rabin killed. The Palestinians wanted either the plan outlined by the Accords or something better. Perfectly understandable on both sides.
Whenever Israel offers concessions, Palestinians respond with violence. Even this latest war Hamas started in a most horrific way comes at the heels of Israel agreeing to let thousands of Gazans to work inside Israel.
What concessions has Israel offered?

If it's "We'll stop murdering you if you stop resisting our efforts to drive you out of Palestine", then yeah, the Palestinians have responded to that one with violence.
Israel pulled entirely out of Gaza, there's no driving out going on.
What concessions has Israel offered, Loren?

You and Derec are using the plural form so you must think there was more than one.

List them.
What kind of concessions do you think Israel should offer, having been the victim of a brutal attack?

I don't think Israel should make concessions to Hamas.

That does not mean Israel should be given free rein to starve, bomb, and brutalize the civilians of Gaza. It should not be allowed to deny them water. But I firmly believe Israel should want peacemakers to succeed in bringing prosperity to Palestinians who have chosen to forswear violence, which means rewarding Abbas and Fatah with major improvements in Palestinian communities and recognition of Palestinian rights. And IMO Israel should insist on having the PA be the go-between negotiators for Gaza, at least until the current spate of fighting dies down.

The biggest problem with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is that people who don't fight back against Israel's expansion have their land stolen, their orchards and farms ruined, and their livelihoods destroyed, while people who do fight back have the exact same thing happen only quicker. We can all see the incentive to be violent but where is the incentive to be peaceful?

Years ago, the PA offered major concessions on Jerusalem and the settlements. This was after it formally recognized the Right of Israel to exist and the Right of Jewish immigrants to live there. I think it's time Israel offered a few major concessions as well, starting with recognizing the Right of Palestinians to remain in their homes in Palestine. Honestly, I don't believe Israel will be doing that anytime soon. The settlers have the upper hand in Israeli society and the Knesset. The violence they commit has been on the increase since 2022
but arrests and prosecutions for those acts of violence haven't.

I know there’s long history of enmity between Israel and Palestine. But Hamas is a terrorist organization which attacked Israel without warning. There has been grave wrong in the part of Israel and grave wrong on the part of Palestine prior to the recent attack by Hamas. I cannot see how Israel now owes Hamas concessions for a brutal surprise attack.

Do you honestly think the IDF and Hamas have been warning each other about impending attacks before this one?
I agree for the most part with your points. However, reading Don2's post below, I think that it is very likely that indeed, both sides DO warn each other but whether that warning is noted by the right people and treated seriously enough, I can't say. Perhaps no one can.

As to your point about earlier agreements between Israel and PA, yes, both have violated and continue to wage aggressions against each other. The question is why? Why are the fans of war being flamed (both sideds)? WHO PROFITS? Not Israel and not the Palestinians. I have no idea what entities it might be who are profiting from war, conflict, death and destruction but someone is. Who profits is always the most salient point to any armed conflict. I mean directly, via currency, not by winning some political point.
 
Sure, and Ukraine needs to get used to unprovoked Russian militray occupation and colonization, and learn to like it.
Ukraine is more like Israel. And Russia like Iran and its proxies. Think about it. Both want to destroy the other. Russia thinks Ukraine belongs to it by rights, and Iran wants to destroy Israel and replace it with an Arab, Muslim "Palestine". They both also love attacking civilians.
Look at a map of Israel. Palestinians are herd into small areas of Gaza and the West Bank. The militray occupation in the West Bank is slowly pushing Palestinians off their land. They are in the way of Israeli progress.
They could have had 97% or so of the "West Bank" had they accepted the peace deal offered to them by Barak and not decided to start the second intifada instead.
Show us the offer.

Show us the proposed boundaries and how they encompassed 97% of the West Bank.

Show us Barak's offer to formally recognize that area as the Palestinian State.

Don't just spin a yarn about how wonderful Ehud Barak's offer was. And don't try to sweep Yitzak Rabin's offer under the rug. Rabin offered to follow the Oslo Accords and was denounced and murdered for it. If you want to convince us that Barak's offer was a better deal for the Palestinians, or even something close to comparable, you'll have to do more than merely proclaim it.
It doesn't even matter what was in the offer. If he didn't like it he could have made a counter offer. He didn't.

It matters what was in the offer.

It matters because (here's the tricky part) if the offer was a shit sandwich then turning it down was reasonable, justifiable, and predictable.

What was the offer Ehud Barak made as a replacement for the Oslo Accords?

And, as has been pointed out numerous times and supported by links to credible sources, Arafat's counter offer was "we stick to the plan our representatives negotiated."

The Israelis wanted a different plan because following the one outlined in the Oslo Accords is what got Rabin killed. The Palestinians wanted either the plan outlined by the Accords or something better. Perfectly understandable on both sides.
Whenever Israel offers concessions, Palestinians respond with violence. Even this latest war Hamas started in a most horrific way comes at the heels of Israel agreeing to let thousands of Gazans to work inside Israel.
What concessions has Israel offered?

If it's "We'll stop murdering you if you stop resisting our efforts to drive you out of Palestine", then yeah, the Palestinians have responded to that one with violence.
Israel pulled entirely out of Gaza, there's no driving out going on.
What concessions has Israel offered, Loren?

You and Derec are using the plural form so you must think there was more than one.

List them.
What kind of concessions do you think Israel should offer, having been the victim of a brutal attack?

I don't think Israel should make concessions to Hamas.

That does not mean Israel should be given free rein to starve, bomb, and brutalize the civilians of Gaza. It should not be allowed to deny them water. But I firmly believe Israel should want peacemakers to succeed in bringing prosperity to Palestinians who have chosen to forswear violence, which means rewarding Abbas and Fatah with major improvements in Palestinian communities and recognition of Palestinian rights. And IMO Israel should insist on having the PA be the go-between negotiators for Gaza, at least until the current spate of fighting dies down.

The biggest problem with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is that people who don't fight back against Israel's expansion have their land stolen, their orchards and farms ruined, and their livelihoods destroyed, while people who do fight back have the exact same thing happen only quicker. We can all see the incentive to be violent but where is the incentive to be peaceful?

Years ago, the PA offered major concessions on Jerusalem and the settlements. This was after it formally recognized the Right of Israel to exist and the Right of Jewish immigrants to live there. I think it's time Israel offered a few major concessions as well, starting with recognizing the Right of Palestinians to remain in their homes in Palestine. Honestly, I don't believe Israel will be doing that anytime soon. The settlers have the upper hand in Israeli society and the Knesset. The violence they commit has been on the increase since 2022
but arrests and prosecutions for those acts of violence haven't.

I know there’s long history of enmity between Israel and Palestine. But Hamas is a terrorist organization which attacked Israel without warning. There has been grave wrong in the part of Israel and grave wrong on the part of Palestine prior to the recent attack by Hamas. I cannot see how Israel now owes Hamas concessions for a brutal surprise attack.

Do you honestly think the IDF and Hamas have been warning each other about impending attacks before this one?
I agree for the most part with your points. However, reading Don2's post below, I think that it is very likely that indeed, both sides DO warn each other but whether that warning is noted by the right people and treated seriously enough, I can't say. Perhaps no one can.

As to your point about earlier agreements between Israel and PA, yes, both have violated and continue to wage aggressions against each other. The question is why? Why are the fans of war being flamed (both sideds)? WHO PROFITS? Not Israel and not the Palestinians. I have no idea what entities it might be who are profiting from war, conflict, death and destruction but someone is. Who profits is always the most salient point to any armed conflict. I mean directly, via currency, not by winning some political point.
Well, Iran profits. I think that this attack was solely designed to stop the normalization of relationships between Israel and the Arab states. Once that happens, Iran and Hamas will be Isolated with only Russia and North Korea to depend on.
 
I think that this attack was solely designed to stop the normalization of relationships between Israel and the Arab states.

I don't know about solely. But yeah, Iran definitely benefits from the suffering and death of Palestinians.

It's unfortunate for everyone that the Teaparty and Trump scuttled the Peace Treaty with Iran. Iran would have far fewer reasons to stoke the violence and more to support peace if the Republicans hadn't done that.
Tom
 
What kind of concessions do you think Israel should offer, having been the victim of a brutal attack?

I don't think Israel should make concessions to Hamas.

That does not mean Israel should be given free rein to starve, bomb, and brutalize the civilians of Gaza. It should not be allowed to deny them water. But I firmly believe Israel should want peacemakers to succeed in bringing prosperity to Palestinians who have chosen to forswear violence, which means rewarding Abbas and Fatah with major improvements in Palestinian communities and recognition of Palestinian rights. And IMO Israel should insist on having the PA be the go-between negotiators for Gaza, at least until the current spate of fighting dies down.

The biggest problem with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is that people who don't fight back against Israel's expansion have their land stolen, their orchards and farms ruined, and their livelihoods destroyed, while people who do fight back have the exact same thing happen only quicker. We can all see the incentive to be violent but where is the incentive to be peaceful?

Years ago, the PA offered major concessions on Jerusalem and the settlements. This was after it formally recognized the Right of Israel to exist and the Right of Jewish immigrants to live there. I think it's time Israel offered a few major concessions as well, starting with recognizing the Right of Palestinians to remain in their homes in Palestine. Honestly, I don't believe Israel will be doing that anytime soon. The settlers have the upper hand in Israeli society and the Knesset. The violence they commit has been on the increase since 2022
but arrests and prosecutions for those acts of violence haven't.

I know there’s long history of enmity between Israel and Palestine. But Hamas is a terrorist organization which attacked Israel without warning. There has been grave wrong in the part of Israel and grave wrong on the part of Palestine prior to the recent attack by Hamas. I cannot see how Israel now owes Hamas concessions for a brutal surprise attack.

Do you honestly think the IDF and Hamas have been warning each other about impending attacks before this one?
I agree for the most part with your points. However, reading Don2's post below, I think that it is very likely that indeed, both sides DO warn each other but whether that warning is noted by the right people and treated seriously enough, I can't say. Perhaps no one can.

As to your point about earlier agreements between Israel and PA, yes, both have violated and continue to wage aggressions against each other.
The PA doesn't. That's a very important point that gets swept under the rug all too often. Hamas broke away from the PA when it engaged in a shooting match with Fatah and then stopped holding elections in Gaza.

Israel apologists used to say Israel would be happy to make peace if only the Palestinians would recognize Israel's Right to Exist. The PA did that.

Then it was "Israel would be happy to make peace if only the Palestinians would recognize Israel's Right to Exist in peace and security on the land it has claimed". The PA did that.

Then it was "Israel would be happy to make peace if only the Palestinians would forswear violence as a means to achieve their ends". The PA did that. Not only did Israel not make any effort toward peace, the Israelis pitched a bloody fit when the PA sought recognition and representation at the UN so they could pursue peace at the international institution devoted to doing that very thing.

The Palestinians have made huge concessions over the years. It's time for Israel to make them too. And it's time for Israel to stop building settlements and start arresting settlers who commit acts of violence and intimidation.

Frankly, I don't see anything but more brutality and killing happening anytime soon. Racists and bigots are running things in Israel and Gaza, the PA is mostly toothless, and the only acts of violence the likes of Netanyahu and America's Religious Right decry are the ones that kill Jews.

IMO the Two State solution died with the Oslo Accords. The only options left are genocide, ethnic cleansing, Israel's defeat, or equal rights in the One State solution.


The question is why? Why are the fans of war being flamed (both sideds)? WHO PROFITS? Not Israel and not the Palestinians. I have no idea what entities it might be who are profiting from war, conflict, death and destruction but someone is. Who profits is always the most salient point to any armed conflict. I mean directly, via currency, not by winning some political point.

Israel profits:

The United States committed over $3.3 billion in foreign assistance to Israel in 2022, the most recent year for which data exists.[1] About $8.8 million of that went toward the country's economy, while 99.7% of the aid went to the Israeli military.

Israel can afford to throw its weight around because it gets a HUGE amount of military funding and support from the US. It can afford to keep building settlements, roads, pipelines, etc. while providing universal health care and to pay the basic living expenses of ultra-religious Jews who spend all day studying the Torah. It can afford to appease it's most violent and strident factions because it doesn't have to support itself.

Also, Israel profits every time an orchard, farm, mineral deposit, well, grazing land, etc., is seized by Zionists and declared Israeli property. The amount of wealth each individual parcel of land is worth may be small but in aggregate the profit to Israel is huge.

If the US cut everything except for disaster relief and basic humanitarian aid, the Israelis would be a lot less bellicose and the theft of land would have to stop. We Americans bear a lot of responsibility for what's happening in Palestine because we provide the funding that makes it affordable.
 
Last edited:
The PA doesn't. That's a very important point that gets swept under the rug all too often. Hamas broke away from the PA when it engaged in a shooting match with Fatah and then stopped holding elections in Gaza.
Its not useful to Israel or anyone if only a part of the Palestinians agree that Israel has a right to exist. Hamas, Hezbollah do not and people wonder why Israel is a bit wary about that.
And it's time for Israel to stop building settlements and start arresting settlers who commit acts of violence and intimidation.
Yes to that
Frankly, I don't see anything but more brutality and killing happening anytime soon. Racists and bigots are running things in Israel and Gaza, the PA is mostly toothless,
Tragically all too true

Israel can afford to throw its weight around because it gets a HUGE amount of military funding and support from the US. It can afford to keep building settlements, roads, pipelines, etc. while providing universal health care and to pay the basic living expenses of ultra-religious Jews who spend all day studying the Torah. It can afford to appease it's most violent and strident factions because it doesn't have to support itself.
If rockets weren't lobbed into Israel or raiding parties enter from the north and south-west and if Iran et al. did not constantly say "delenda est Israel" (with apologies to Cato the Elder) then Israel would not need all those supplies and money.
If the US cut everything except for disaster relief and basic humanitarian aid, the Israelis would be a lot less bellicose and the theft of land would have to stop. We Americans bear a lot of responsibility for what's happening in Palestine because we provide the funding that makes it affordable.
Israel's neighbours are also responsible for what is happening in Palestine.
 
Then it was "Israel would be happy to make peace if only the Palestinians would forswear violence as a means to achieve their ends". The PA did that.
And Israel was happy to negotiate. But Arafat would not budge one bit from the maximalist demands - all pre-1967 territory and return of so-called "refugees" which would make Israel untenable demographically. So Arafat called out the Second Intifada instead. Which led to Gaza disengagement, which led to Hamas takeover, which led to what we have now. Fuck Arafat!
Not only did Israel not make any effort toward peace, the Israelis pitched a bloody fit when the PA sought recognition and representation at the UN so they could pursue peace at the international institution devoted to doing that very thing.
That is completely wrong. Israel made many concessions toward peace. And every time they do, they are met with violence.
As to UN representation, why should that happen before the status of "Palestine" is determined via negotiations? PA and UN were putting the cart before the horse.
The Palestinians have made huge concessions over the years.
LMAO. No.
It's time for Israel to make them too.
They have made many concessions. More than Palestinians. PA has halfheartedly accepted the existence of Israel, at least to the western audiences, but they still deal in anti-Israeli terrorism and glorification thereof.
And it's time for Israel to stop building settlements and start arresting settlers who commit acts of violence and intimidation.
Israelis who commit violence get arrested by Israel. Palestinians who commit violence against Israelis get celebrated by the PA and get a "pay for slay" stipend. Sometimes PA names streets and schools after terrorists too.
Ramallah street named for terrorist
IMO the Two State solution died with the Oslo Accords. The only options left are genocide, ethnic cleansing, Israel's defeat, or equal rights in the One State solution.
Israel's defeat is equivalent to genocide. As is, frankly, the so-called "one state solution" which is really the "final solution". This "one state" would be dominated by Muslims and Arabs and Jews would either be killed or driven out. The only possible solution involves crushing the terror groups, defanging Iran, and convincing Palestinians that their best course of action is to be a good neighbor and not a genocidal menace.
 
Then it was "Israel would be happy to make peace if only the Palestinians would forswear violence as a means to achieve their ends". The PA did that.
And Israel was happy to negotiate. But Arafat would not budge one bit from the maximalist demands - all pre-1967 territory and return of so-called "refugees" which would make Israel untenable demographically.

You should read the Oslo Accords before you make statements about what Arafat and the PA were offering. That bit about demanding all pre-1967 territory is so wrong it's almost laughable. And the way the PA proposed implementing the Right of Return for Refugees wasn't anything close to what you are suggesting.
So Arafat called out the Second Intifada instead.

And you should read about the start of the Second Intifada and how it intensified from angry but unarmed protests into a full on campaign of revenge bombings. Saying "Arafat did it!" is not just simplistic, it's factually incorrect.
Which led to Gaza disengagement, which led to Hamas takeover, which led to what we have now. Fuck Arafat!

You don't have to like Arafat. I don't like him either. But IMO you should try to stick to the facts about what he said and did, and why he did it, not just make shit up about him.

The Oslo Accords were a series of steps designed to build trust between Israelis and Palestinians as they worked their way toward peace. Israel faltered on that path, and by doing so it reinforced the mistrust of the Palestinians. When Netanyahu became a dominant force in Israeli politics, trust was no longer possible.

I have to go out soon so I will return to this later tonight. I want to post some links about Netanyahu, his relationship to Ariel Sharon (another one of the real-life genuine terrorists who became Prime Minister of Israel), and why Leah Rabin never forgave him for her husband's assassination.
Not only did Israel not make any effort toward peace, the Israelis pitched a bloody fit when the PA sought recognition and representation at the UN so they could pursue peace at the international institution devoted to doing that very thing.
That is completely wrong. Israel made many concessions toward peace.

List them.

And every time they do, they are met with violence.
As to UN representation, why should that happen before the status of "Palestine" is determined via negotiations? PA and UN were putting the cart before the horse.
The Palestinians have made huge concessions over the years.
LMAO. No.
It's time for Israel to make them too.
They have made many concessions. More than Palestinians. PA has halfheartedly accepted the existence of Israel, at least to the western audiences, but they still deal in anti-Israeli terrorism and glorification thereof.
And it's time for Israel to stop building settlements and start arresting settlers who commit acts of violence and intimidation.
Israelis who commit violence get arrested by Israel. Palestinians who commit violence against Israelis get celebrated by the PA and get a "pay for slay" stipend. Sometimes PA names streets and schools after terrorists too.
Ramallah street named for terrorist

So does Israel.

There are scores of schools, streets, municipal buildings, etc. named after Irgun and Lehi murderers. Hell, Israel even put Lehi's founder on a postage stamp!

avraham stern.jpg
IMO the Two State solution died with the Oslo Accords. The only options left are genocide, ethnic cleansing, Israel's defeat, or equal rights in the One State solution.
Israel's defeat is equivalent to genocide. As is, frankly, the so-called "one state solution" which is really the "final solution". This "one state" would be dominated by Muslims and Arabs and Jews would either be killed or driven out. The only possible solution involves crushing the terror groups, defanging Iran, and convincing Palestinians that their best course of action is to be a good neighbor and not a genocidal menace.
<Psst... your anti-Semitism is showing>
 
"It is important to also recognize the attacks by Hamas did not happen in a vacuum. The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of suffocating occupation."
-United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres

Yeah. We know. Most everyone gets it. Most nation's governments. Most people.

Th irony is Israel thinks it's going to root out and destroy Hamas but they are actually now just a recruiting tool for Hamas, particularly with how young the Palestinian population is.

If the US stands with Israel and turns its back on Ukraine, it will do more damage to US/Europe relations than Trump ever could. Good job Biden. You're lucky the Republicans can put anything close to a human being up for candidacy.
 
Then it was "Israel would be happy to make peace if only the Palestinians would forswear violence as a means to achieve their ends". The PA did that.
And Israel was happy to negotiate. But Arafat would not budge one bit from the maximalist demands - all pre-1967 territory and return of so-called "refugees" which would make Israel untenable demographically. So Arafat called out the Second Intifada instead. Which led to Gaza disengagement, which led to Hamas takeover, which led to what we have now. Fuck Arafat!
Not only did Israel not make any effort toward peace, the Israelis pitched a bloody fit when the PA sought recognition and representation at the UN so they could pursue peace at the international institution devoted to doing that very thing.
That is completely wrong. Israel made many concessions toward peace. And every time they do, they are met with violence.
As to UN representation, why should that happen before the status of "Palestine" is determined via negotiations? PA and UN were putting the cart before the horse.
The Palestinians have made huge concessions over the years.
LMAO. No.
It's time for Israel to make them too.
They have made many concessions. More than Palestinians. PA has halfheartedly accepted the existence of Israel, at least to the western audiences, but they still deal in anti-Israeli terrorism and glorification thereof.
And it's time for Israel to stop building settlements and start arresting settlers who commit acts of violence and intimidation.
Israelis who commit violence get arrested by Israel. Palestinians who commit violence against Israelis get celebrated by the PA and get a "pay for slay" stipend. Sometimes PA names streets and schools after terrorists too.
Ramallah street named for terrorist
IMO the Two State solution died with the Oslo Accords. The only options left are genocide, ethnic cleansing, Israel's defeat, or equal rights in the One State solution.
Israel's defeat is equivalent to genocide. As is, frankly, the so-called "one state solution" which is really the "final solution". This "one state" would be dominated by Muslims and Arabs and Jews would either be killed or driven out. The only possible solution involves crushing the terror groups, defanging Iran, and convincing Palestinians that their best course of action is to be a good neighbor and not a genocidal menace.
Agree that Hamas needs to be crushed. Agree that one-state will never happen. The hatred between the two groups won't be fixed for many generations. However, the only chance of a real peace is the two state solution. And the Israeli far right is doing as much damage to this process as Hamas. The Israelis need to stop taking unclaimed land and be prepared to pull out settlements in the West Bank when the Palestinians are ready to move forward on a two state solution.
 
What is this talk about "the Palestinians"? There is no one gov't or body of Palestinians. There are many factions - Fatah, Hamas, those fed up with both, etc.....

Blaming "the Palestinians" for _______ is pointless because there are no "the Palestinians". Blaming "the Israelis" for _____ is pointless because different Israeli gov'ts had extremely different policies.

These recriminations are only good for emotional release.
Pointing fingers at the past at who did what to whom is the past because that blame is simply an excuse for violence and an impediment to real peace. There are innocent victims on every side. And there is plenty of blame to go around on all sides.

These region needs Ghandhi like leaders. All it has right now are Trumps (or worse). Which means more of the same.
 
Same reasoning as Putin, there is no such thing as Ukraine and Ukrainian culture, it never exiasted.

Same dehumanization Jews were subjected to by the Nazis. There s no other way to frame it.

From reporting among younger people and college stents there is a shift to support the Palestinians. And of course that is painted as support of Hammas and sancnctiing of terrorism.

Obama said he thought the USA should reflect the world, and now we do. We have both Palestini. Arab, and Jewish communities in the USA. And now we have yet another divisive political issue, Israel vs Pales tines.


A six year old Palestinian kid in a neighborhood called Little Palestine was stabbed to death by the families property owner.




04:59
Jerusalem CNN —

Israel’s far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich denied the existence of a Palestinian people or nationhood over the weekend, prompting a rebuke from the United States just weeks after calling for a Palestinian town to be “erased.”

Smotrich, a Jewish nationalist, argued that the idea of Palestinian nationhood was invented in the past century in response to the Zionist movement to found modern-day Israel.

“Who was the first Palestinian king? What language do the Palestinians have? Was there ever a Palestinian currency? Is there a Palestinian history or culture? Nothing. There is no such thing as a Palestinian people,” Smotrich said at a speech in Paris.

US National Security Council Spokesman John Kirby on Monday objected to the comments, saying they would not help to calm tensions in the region.

Smotrich’s appearance in Paris also caused a diplomatic incident between Israel and Jordan. The podium he was standing at was draped in what appeared to be a variation of the Israeli flag displaying an enlarged map of Israel that included the occupied West Bank, Gaza and most of Jordan.

A spokesperson for Smotrich said the flag used at the event he attended was “set decoration” put there by the conference organizers and that the minister was only a guest, according to Reuters.
 


04:59
Jerusalem CNN —

Israel’s far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich denied the existence of a Palestinian people or nationhood over the weekend, prompting a rebuke from the United States just weeks after calling for a Palestinian town to be “erased.”

Going back to the early days of the creation of the Jewish State, I see. It sounds like he wants to be the new Josef Weitz, destroying Palestinian villages so the Palestinian people will be forced to live elsewhere.


Smotrich, a Jewish nationalist, argued that the idea of Palestinian nationhood was invented in the past century in response to the Zionist movement to found modern-day Israel.
“Who was the first Palestinian king? What language do the Palestinians have? Was there ever a Palestinian currency? Is there a Palestinian history or culture? Nothing. There is no such thing as a Palestinian people,” Smotrich said at a speech in Paris.

And following the standard Zionist Dogma Guide to Rhetoric, as well.

Yeah, no one knows who the first king was because back in 8,500-6,000 BCE when the Natufian Culture was a thing and Jericho was founded, they didn't write down the names of their rulers. And all through the thousands of years before the late Bronze Age they didn't leave records with the names of all their kings on them, even though archeologists have found overwhelming evidence that organized societies ruled by kings existed right there in Palestine. And, hard as it is to believe, those walled cities and villages actually used coins to facilitate commerce!

That guy is counting on the ignorance of his listeners to make his case, Unfortunately, some people are so easily swayed they will actually believe his horseshit.
US National Security Council Spokesman John Kirby on Monday objected to the comments, saying they would not help to calm tensions in the region.

Smotrich’s appearance in Paris also caused a diplomatic incident between Israel and Jordan. The podium he was standing at was draped in what appeared to be a variation of the Israeli flag displaying an enlarged map of Israel that included the occupied West Bank, Gaza and most of Jordan.

A spokesperson for Smotrich said the flag used at the event he attended was “set decoration” put there by the conference organizers and that the minister was only a guest, according to Reuters.
The bit about the flag is very interesting.

When Zionists from Europe first started gearing up for the fight to create Israel, some of them, Menachim Begin included, used to sing a patriotoic song based on the Zionist poem, The East Bank of the Jordan. Each stanza of the song ends with the line "Two Banks has the Jordan - This is ours and That as well"

I hope King Abdullah II of Jordan is paying attention. Sounds like Smotrich is oldschool. Once he's finished with the West Bank he'll probably start eyeballing that eastern bank. Maybe planning to completely destroy some villages there so Zionist colonizers will have an easier time taking over the water supplies.
 
Last edited:
By definition Zionism is Jews have a right rom 2000 years ago to make the area Jewish.

I think the quote may represent he long running conservative Netanyahu administration.

There are moderates in Israel and thy had a shot at taking over but Netanyahu against the odds manged to get reelected. Despite his corruption charges.

Israelis ignoring the underlying cause of the Palestinian violence is like our conservative politicians who deny or downplay the affect slavery and Jim Crow had on blacks. It came to a peak in the 60s-70s when in some paces it was literally ope season on blacks.

Hoover used the FBI like his personal militia to go after blacks and MLK. The Black Panthers started out as community social support group for blacks. Eventfully they radicalized and armed themselves.

If you do not understand American black history you will not understand the pent up black rage that erupted into riots after Floyd. The BLM movement ended in violent demonstrations and riots here in Seattle.

For a while we saw some political recognition of the underlying causes, yet recently there have heard an old silvery rationalization, it was not so bad really. This time somebody said slavery gave blacks job skills.

So, the Israeli conservative rationalizations are all too obvious. I think Romney said turn Gaza into a parking lot.
 
Yeah, no one knows who the first king was because back in 8,500-6,000 BCE when the Natufian Culture was a thing and Jericho was founded, they didn't write down the names of their rulers. And all through the thousands of years before the late Bronze Age they didn't leave records with the names of all their kings on them, even though archeologists have found overwhelming evidence that organized societies ruled by kings existed right there in Palestine. And, hard as it is to believe, those walled cities and villages actually used coins to facilitate commerce!

The first coins we have evidence of come from around 650-600 BCE and were minted by the Lydians in Anatolia. Do you have some reference to the use of coins in the Natufian culture? I can't find any corroboration for that. Lydia was an Indoeuropean community that existed thousands of years later than the Natufians.
 
I'd like to make a linguistic note. Many present-day Israeli names originate in Biblical names, but both English-version and Modern-Hebrew-version names have some differences from the originals.

The J's in Biblical names originally had a "y" sound, like "year" instead of "jeer". But medieval French people turned /y/ into /dzh/, and that's the English spelling pronunciation of that letter. In modern French it has become /zh/. However, German and northern and eastern European languages keep the letter's original phonetic value: the city Jena's name is pronounced "Yena".

That's why the Modern Hebrew versions are spelled with a "y", like Binyamin instead of Benjamin, Yoel instead of Joel, Yael instead of Jael, etc.

But Modern Hebrew has some phonetic changes from Biblical Hebrew. For instance, Biblical Hebrew w is Modern Hebrew v, as is b in the middle of words. Thus, English-version Deborah is closer to the original than Modern Hebrew Dvora.

There are several other changes, but I won't go into those.
 
Back
Top Bottom