it's actually doubly absurd and not for a reason you think.That is definitely the police claim here. It gets absurd when we are asked to believe in a coincidence inconsistent with our observations.
First, it can actually be a coincidence, just ask any mathematician they will explain it to you.
Secondly, the only people who claim coincidence are the "prosecution"
It was not coincidence, they guy with a bad heart and on drugs fought the police and had a heart attack. People are having heart attacks in sleep simply because they sleep on a wrong side.
So does this mean the "neck thing" is relevant? If the heart attack is a no-shit Sherlock moment then 4 minutes of "neck thing" instead of 4 minutes of medial aid is relevant no? This case really rests on the 4-minute "neck thing" bro. Was it purposeful or not is the question. Based on testimony from all the medical professionals (including Fowler) it was the police restraint that threw a burning match into a highly combustible environment. With Floyd being in their care (handcuffed) did they do their job as best they could as police officers to secure Floyd and Floyd's well-being? If not, why not? What actions were taken to prevent harm to the person in their custody? Where did they fail and how? These questions are basic shit.
The 4-minute "neck thing" will be hard to get listed under administering aid or the need for force columns.
Regardless he will be acquitted of all charges. At least the state didn't wait until after the acquittal to pay Floyd's family so they can use that money to move out before the city burns.