thebeave
Contributor
You sure know how to read stuff that isn't there. Are you using those special Mormon "seer stones" to read my posts?The context of how you provided the info, both in introduction and the quotes. As "speaking of FEMA" would actually be them firing the person as that was the only act of FEMA involved in the situation. Instead, you provided the information as if FEMA was involved with the actual guidance.How do you figure?You seem to have tried to paint this as FEMA guidance, when it was an individual employee that did this and they were fired.I can only imagine what is going to happen if Trump loses.On Saturday, FEMA workers had to halt their work in Rutherford County due to reports that National Guard troops saw “armed militia” threatening the workers, according to the Washington Post, which cited an email to federal agencies helping with the response, verified by unnamed federal officials. It’s not clear if the threat was credible. FEMA Pauses efforts due to threats
Speaking of FEMA (from yesterday on Snopes)...
FEMA Official Told Workers to Skip Homes With Pro-Trump Signs After Hurricane Milton
So gaslighting then.All I did was provide the link and title verbatim from Snopes. There is no opinion from me in what I posted.
I thought the story was interesting, and figured the appropriate thread was this one, as it has to with FEMA and hurridane disaster victims. Certainly its not the exact same situation as the OP as the "bad guys" are reversed, but it is sort of a "variation on a theme". Which is why I said "Speaking of FEMA..." And I read the full article. Do you honestly I would be so dumb as to try and project a specific narrative with my choice of words, when the details of the situation are clearly spelled out in the article?