Shadowy Man
Contributor
I have no claim as to whether he is "paid" or not. I simply observe his postings here and deduce that they are bullshit. He specifically stated I said something personally but could not back it up with actual facts. He claimed he read the Mueller report, but when asked to cite specific sections that supported his claims about it he couldn't. He resembles the student giving a book report on a book he didn't read.So what? He’s not paid to have credibility. Especially as purveyor of facts. Recitation of the Party Line is all that is required, and even you will have to admit that he’s pretty good at that. Repetition will have its effect, no matter how absurd the assertions.He has zero credibility as a purveyor of facts.
I don't know if he's "good" at anything. His repetition here seems to have little effect, because he is mostly arguing with people who know how to critically assess statements of fact. He would have better luck on forums filled with more credulous folks.
Edited to add: there are many posters here with whom I have great disagreement but are able to support their opinions with clear logic and facts. I have infinitely more respect for those than someone who just flat out lies.