steve_bank
Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
Another politics thread.I had to cut off my answer above quickly due to someone at the front door.It is difficult to get a consensus in congress as it is, adding more will gridlock congress permanently.I think our number of state representatives to the national congress needs to be increased greatly.Most or all states have referendums. Here in Washington referendums work, get enough signatures on a petition and it goes onto a ballot.
Stes are mre focused and resposive.
During the BLM riots there was a knee jerk reaction to to reduce police funding and limit the scope of police.
The ability of police to pursue criminals was severely weekend leading to criminals taking advantage of the fact. A cop car pulls up behind and they just speed away. As crime went up people complained and it swung back the other way.
Our city council polices failed miserably, and the extreme progressives were voted out and replaced by moderates more pro police and pro business.
Wauy back in the 90s the stae had a monopoly on the sale of hard liquor fixing prices at state stores. A rerendum led to a vote to get rid of it and it passed.
There are problems of course but at the state level more responsive.
The problem is we are trying to fit a model created by the founders for a small agricultural system to our modern diverse complex country. Too many compering social, religious, politico, and economic factions. With no one willing to compromise.
The founders intended the president to be selected by educated electors who were land owners with a stake in the country.
That is exactly the reason why better representation is needed And frankly, the only ones I see unwilling to compromise are the crazy wing of the Republican partyThe problem is we are trying to fit a model created by the founders for a small agricultural system to our modern diverse complex country. Too many compering social, religious, politico, and economic factions. With no one willing to compromise.
Are you trying to explain the electoral college? I see nothing in the constitution that land owners had to be educated with a stake in the country. Land owning white men is the only requirement in the constitution.The founders intended the president to be selected by educated electors who were land owners with a stake in the country.
And we need netter representation in the house.
The number of senators are fixed at 2 per state.
The number of representatives form each state up or down varies with state population.
The current number is 435 in the house, imagine what it wid be like lie with 1000. It owd be a redistricting nightmare in the states.
As an independent centrist sitting at the net I watch the ball go back and forth. To me both sides act the same.
Progressives spend on stoical programs as if there is no end to it, and conservatives demand fiscal impressibility. Biden wants to give away upwards of a billion in student loan forgiveness even though he has no authority.
Here in the Seattle ares illegal areas are a problem. There is no money for them and schools and hospitals are bearing the burden. Biden has been tone deaf.
To me both sides are equally ideological and impractical.