Images that make you laugh

[Trausti]

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

 

[angelo]

 

[ZiprHead]

This one made me think of Keith.

 

[WAB]

And Lee Strobel looks an awful lot like Hugh Hefner.

 

[Angry Floof]

Looks like an algorithm that reads sites like IMDB, where people like those first four might be listed under actors for documentaries they're in. Same with Craig. I'm sure he's featured in some docs around the topic of atheism.

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

 

[ZiprHead]

 

[bilby]

Looks like an algorithm that reads sites like IMDB, where people like those first four might be listed under actors for documentaries they're in. Same with Craig. I'm sure he's featured in some docs around the topic of atheism.

I find it much more amusing that the algorithm identifies WLC as a philosopher, than that it identifies him as an atheist.

 

[Angry Floof]

Looks like an algorithm that reads sites like IMDB, where people like those first four might be listed under actors for documentaries they're in. Same with Craig. I'm sure he's featured in some docs around the topic of atheism.

I find it much more amusing that the algorithm identifies WLC as a philosopher, than that it identifies him as an atheist.

Good point, yes.

 

[Keith&Co.]

This one made me think of Keith.

View attachment 20366

Wow. Made me think of all three of my little idiots before i even saw your note....

Thank Xena none of them could do it without spending an hour recentering the lettering....

 

[ZiprHead]

 

[bilby]

 

[bilby]

 

[Loren Pechtel]

View attachment 20381

I wonder how many will get it.

 

[bilby]

View attachment 20381

I wonder how many will get it.

Its subtlety is what I like about it. Takes a second to work it out.

 

[C_Mucius_Scaevola]

View attachment 20381

I wonder how many will get it.

Not at first viewing, but yes, I managed to work it out.

 

[Atheos]

Personally I think there's a technical error in how it was drawn that makes the joke a lot less obvious than it would otherwise be. With all the other attention to detail I'm surprised Phillips overlooked the viewing angle for the equipment suggested.

 

[ZiprHead]

Personally I think there's a technical error in how it was drawn that makes the joke a lot less obvious than it would otherwise be. With all the other attention to detail I'm surprised Phillips overlooked the viewing angle for the equipment suggested.

Yeah, that kinda' threw me off too.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Personally I think there's a technical error in how it was drawn that makes the joke a lot less obvious than it would otherwise be. With all the other attention to detail I'm surprised Phillips overlooked the viewing angle for the equipment suggested.

Yeah, that kinda' threw me off too.

Hmmm. I guess I know JUST enough to get the joke, but not enough to be distracted by the detail...

Which appeals to me as a sort of IQ test. Show people cartoons see if they shrug, laugh or point out the technical errors.

"Yeah, he started laughing at page 1, didn't start bitching until page 13, puts him at 120-130."