You aren't getting the point. They aren't complaining about the election results, they are trying to stigmatize democratic elections in general. They are implying the results can't be trusted, any of the results... because of "the fraud". It is a variation of the God in the Gaps fallacy, which happily seems to rhyme with Fraud in the Gaps.
I see now -- it's not just the Republicans vs. the Democrats -- it's the Republicans vs. democracy itself.
It's not even the Republicans. It's the TeaParty, led by Trump and his supporters, that are the threat to democracy. TeaPartiers are the ones who don't believe in the Electoral College or The Constitution or other basic U.S. institutions.
That distinction will matter... if a coherent resistance movement ever develops within the GOP. As long as congressional Republicans are blindly rubber-stamping whatever Trump wants to do, none of us can afford to treat them as different entities. Not politically at least. In terms of people you actually meet on the street, I think the Tea Party are actually a minority. But they are a minority that sits troublingly close to the reins of power. If they do succeed in coup, it won't matter that most of the country never explicitly endorsed them.
I cannot imagine why you believe that.
Evidence: {}
What a defense of the attackers' actions.
What a big fat load of horse doo-doo. All the coupmeisters have to do is send in their troops.
There's always a first time, and I've seen people attack Abraham Lincoln for supposedly waging a war of aggression against the Southern states.
How could there be a coup in DC? You just said a coup is not possible.
Western Pennsylvanians bowed to George Washington. South Carolinians bowed to Andrew Jackson. The Southern states bowed to Abraham Lincoln.
Source: religious patriotism, I guess? Every government falls to coup eventually, the only question is when.
What a defense of the attackers' actions.
What a big fat load of horse doo-doo. All the coupmeisters have to do is send in their troops.
That's how George Washington suppressed the Whiskey Rebellion. That's what Andrew Jackson threatened for South Carolina. That's what Abraham Lincoln did to the Confederate states.
As an aside, I'm surprised that right-wingers don't hate GW for suppressing a tax revolt.
There's always a first time, and I've seen people attack Abraham Lincoln for supposedly waging a war of aggression against the Southern states.
