• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

January 6 Hearings Live

I wish the court had said more about the claims being without any evidence, and suggest that lawyers who put forth crazy arguments that have already been debunked should face consequences. But I guess this will suffice.
Not only the courts but people generally. People need to start asking what is psychologically wrong with Trumpo and his delusional followers, honestly. It's practice for intelligent people to say nothing because it doesn't accomplish anything with such a person, but there are some people who just need to hear it from someone respectable. People have to speak, not only with their votes.
 
Saw this in reply to Trump tweet today:

B4550A6D-B2EA-43FE-8266-12CA4A06E6C0.jpeg

All I can say is do it, Trump. Cross that fucking Rubicon and see what happens.
 
The Constitution has an answer for seditious members of Congress

Let's review two pieces of news from the last week. First, the American coronavirus pandemic is entering its worst stage yet, with cases and deaths skyrocketing across the country. Last Thursday saw over 3,000 deaths — more than 9/11 or Pearl Harbor — and with ICU beds at or near capacity in most of the country, absent serious change it is possible there will be double or even triple that number per day in a matter of weeks. We may yet top the deadliest day in American history, the Galveston hurricane of 1900 that killed an estimated 8,000 people, very soon. President Trump is doing precisely nothing about this.

Second, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is under investigation for bribery and abuse of office, filed a baldly seditious lawsuit calling for the Supreme Court to overturn the election results in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, and hand their electoral votes to Trump. It was flatly an attempt to overturn the 2020 election, end constitutional government, and install Trump in power. Before the Supreme Court threw the suit out Friday night, 17 other Republican state attorneys general had joined him, along with 126 members of the Republican caucus in the House, while Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has agreed to represent Trump. And this is just one of dozens of attempts that Republicans at all levels of government have concocted to overturn Trump's loss.

In short, material conditions in this country have not been this bad since 1932 at least, and the political situation has not been this bad since 1860. The logical endgame of the rapidly-accelerating Republican attempt to destroy democracy while the country burns would be civil war — if it weren't for the high probability that Democratic leaders would be too cowardly to fight.

But it's worth thinking about what a party seriously committed to preserving democracy would do when faced with a seditious opposition party — namely, cut them out of power and force them to behave. Democrats could declare all traitors ineligible to serve in national office, convene a Patriot Congress composed solely of people who have not committed insurrection against the American government, and use that power to re-entrench democracy.

The reasoning here is very simple. All members of Congress swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, which establishes a republican form of government. The whole point of a republic is that contests for power are conducted through a framework of rules and democratic elections, where all parties agree to respect the result whether they lose or win. Moreover, the premise of this lawsuit was completely preposterous — arguing in effect that states should not be allowed to set their own election rules if that means more Democrats can vote — and provides no evidence whatsoever for false allegations of tens of thousands of instances of voter fraud. Indeed, several of the representatives who support the lawsuit were themselves just elected by the very votes they now say are fraudulent. The proposed remedy — having Republican-dominated legislatures in only the four states that gave Biden his margin of victory select Trump electors — would be straight-up election theft.

In other words, this lawsuit, even though it didn't succeed, is a flagrant attempt to overturn the constitutional system and impose through authoritarian means the rule of a corrupt criminal whose doltish incompetence has gotten hundreds of thousands of Americans killed. It is a "seditious abuse of the judicial process," as the states of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin jointly wrote in their response to Texas trying to steal their elections.
 
I do believe that the Republican legislators in congress and their state counterparts who signed onto the Paxton lawsuit, along with Trump, committed treason by trying to prevent a legally elected president elect from taking office and trying to overthrow an election without legal cause.
 
I do believe that the Republican legislators in congress and their state counterparts who signed onto the Paxton lawsuit, along with Trump, committed treason by trying to prevent a legally elected president elect from taking office and trying to overthrow an election without legal cause.
Just wait till they refuse to count the electoral votes in January, and argue that it should be up to the congress i.e. themselves to choose the president.
 
I do believe that the Republican legislators in congress and their state counterparts who signed onto the Paxton lawsuit, along with Trump, committed treason by trying to prevent a legally elected president elect from taking office and trying to overthrow an election without legal cause.
Just wait till they refuse to count the electoral votes in January, and argue that it should be up to the congress i.e. themselves to choose the president.

Trump is still gone on January 20th.
 
I do believe that the Republican legislators in congress and their state counterparts who signed onto the Paxton lawsuit, along with Trump, committed treason by trying to prevent a legally elected president elect from taking office and trying to overthrow an election without legal cause.
Just wait till they refuse to count the electoral votes in January, and argue that it should be up to the congress i.e. themselves to choose the president.

Close.

The last thing they will try is that when approving in the House of the election that it should not be a vote by individual congress person but by state. That is the last advantage they have and so they will try to use it.
 
I do believe that the Republican legislators in congress and their state counterparts who signed onto the Paxton lawsuit, along with Trump, committed treason by trying to prevent a legally elected president elect from taking office and trying to overthrow an election without legal cause.
Just wait till they refuse to count the electoral votes in January, and argue that it should be up to the congress i.e. themselves to choose the president.

Close.

The last thing they will try is that when approving in the House of the election that it should not be a vote by individual congress person but by state. That is the last advantage they have and so they will try to use it.

Fortunately, that's not correct. If there's an objection by at least one House member and one Senator, then and only then, there will be a debate but for no more than 2 hours. Then both houses have to vote separately on whether to accept the votes or not. But it's a straight vote. Not by state. It only becomes a state by state vote if they are deciding who gets to be President, that is if the results of the E.C. are actually thrown out first. Then the house and only the house votes by state as to who should be President. But prior to that both the house and senate must agree to throw out the votes of the EC. And if by some chance they did do that, it would only go to the house if it was a tie in the electoral college. They could technically throw out enough votes to make Trump the winner. It would cause a riot if they did, but fortunately the dems control the house and it won't happen.

Today a Michigan Republican representative left the party. He became an independent. Wonder if more would buck the system to preserve the constitution.
 
Now Barr has been fired. Trump has fired just about every senior leader that will stand in his way of a violent coup since the election. I bet he asked Barr to do something blatantly unconstitutional and Barr said that he just couldn't go that far. So Trump will replace him with someone who will. I'm telling you. This just doesn't smell right at all.

The question is whether the rank and file bureaucracy will stand by their oaths or blindly follow orders out of fear.

It could be an interesting next few weeks.
 
Now Barr has been fired. Trump has fired just about every senior leader that will stand in his way of a violent coup since the election. I bet he asked Barr to do something blatantly unconstitutional and Barr said that he just couldn't go that far. So Trump will replace him with someone who will. I'm telling you. This just doesn't smell right at all.

The question is whether the rank and file bureaucracy will stand by their oaths or blindly follow orders out of fear.

It could be an interesting next few weeks.

It's really a lot like Hitler's final days in Berlin, but Trump doesn't have the fanatical zealots to commit terror for him. But like Hitler, Trump only wants people around who will lick his boots till the very end.
 
That Berlin bunker was Adolf Hitler's last residence, because he committed suicide in it.

Will Trump commit suicide in the White House's bunker?
 
Back
Top Bottom