It was not speculative. People knew they were lying. Maybe some did not but "experts" certainly knew it was a lie.Sure, if there's a crime, but this was just a speculative news story. What crime do you think happened?
No I don't agree and there are always grounds for a lawsuit.So, you agree there's no crime then? I doubt there is even grounds for a lawsuit.
Libel obviously.No, there are not always grounds. But, again, what crime are you suggesting was committed?
That's why Putin needs to order people at Alpha Bank to sue. And I am not sure it applies to russian government, In any case government critters can certainly sue. Criminal part could be about DNS data which they claim they got. People should lose their jobs and reputation over this. This is a way of stopping this bullshit in western media.Libel is a civil issue in the US, not criminal. And a government can't sue. Maybe Alfa could, but proving it is difficult.
That's why Putin needs to order people at Alpha Bank to sue.
Ultimately everything is under Putin's controlThat's why Putin needs to order people at Alpha Bank to sue.
Are you admitting Alpha Bank is under Putin's control?
but "experts" certainly knew it was a lie.
The whole "It looks suspicions and significant" thing was a lie. No expert would think that. In other words "experts" were lying.but "experts" certainly knew it was a lie.
WHAT was a lie? You keep saying a crime was committed but you can't say what it was.
The whole "It looks suspicions and significant" thing was a lie. No expert would think that. In other words "experts" were lying.but "experts" certainly knew it was a lie.
WHAT was a lie? You keep saying a crime was committed but you can't say what it was.
The whole "It looks suspicions and significant" thing was a lie. No expert would think that. In other words "experts" were lying.
Trump tower server in constant communication with AlphaBank isn't suspicious?
Maybe not to you, but US intelligence would have to be asleep at the wheel not to think that looks fishy.
The whole "It looks suspicions and significant" thing was a lie. No expert would think that. In other words "experts" were lying.
Trump tower server in constant communication with AlphaBank isn't suspicious?
Maybe not to you, but US intelligence would have to be asleep at the wheel not to think that looks fishy.
It's just more fodder for the hysterical ninnies. Snopes
That's why Putin needs to order people at Alpha Bank to sue. And I am not sure it applies to russian government, In any case government critters can certainly sue. Criminal part could be about DNS data which they claim they got. People should lose their jobs and reputation over this. This is a way of stopping this bullshit in western media.Libel is a civil issue in the US, not criminal. And a government can't sue. Maybe Alfa could, but proving it is difficult.
It's just more fodder for the hysterical ninnies. Snopes
"Not proven"
Did you know that that's not the same thing as "FALSE"?
"What the scientists amassed wasn’t a smoking gun. It’s a suggestive body of evidence that doesn’t absolutely preclude alternative explanations."
...which translates to right-wing fanatics as "more fodder for the hysterical ninnies".
I can accept that you see it that way. Right wing fanatics are into all kinds of fantastic characterizations. Meanwhile, investigation seems warranted, and is probably underway.
No, accusing anti-Trumpers of being "hysterical ninnies" is ironic. Blowing smoke and saying anything to defend Trump makes one a "right wing fanatic".It's just more fodder for the hysterical ninnies. Snopes
"Not proven"
Did you know that that's not the same thing as "FALSE"?
"What the scientists amassed wasn’t a smoking gun. It’s a suggestive body of evidence that doesn’t absolutely preclude alternative explanations."
...which translates to right-wing fanatics as "more fodder for the hysterical ninnies".
I can accept that you see it that way. Right wing fanatics are into all kinds of fantastic characterizations. Meanwhile, investigation seems warranted, and is probably underway.
When the inference from evidence provides for multiple but contradictory conclusions, the evidence proves nothing. Pointing that out makes someone a "right wing fanatic"?
No, accusing anti-Trumpers of being "hysterical ninnies" is ironic. Blowing smoke and saying anything to defend Trump makes one a "right wing fanatic".When the inference from evidence provides for multiple but contradictory conclusions, the evidence proves nothing. Pointing that out makes someone a "right wing fanatic"?
I think everyone is jumping the gun on this. Why not wait until the investigation is over and see what it actually uncovers?
The whole "It looks suspicions and significant" thing was a lie. No expert would think that. In other words "experts" were lying.
Trump tower server in constant communication with AlphaBank isn't suspicious?
Maybe not to you, but US intelligence would have to be asleep at the wheel not to think that looks fishy.