• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Multi-Billionaire Oprah Whines About Sexism & Income Inequality At DNC

Can we go back to discussing why successfully overcoming obstacles means you are no longer permitted to point out the existence of obstacles?
You don’t get it. Something is not an obstacle when
1) it doesn’t bother your ilk, and
2) it doesn’t stop every intended person.
 
I also regret the early demise of Firefly….
Personally, I find that to be a tired well. Kinda like people who think they're edgy or hip doing Monty Python quotes or quoting from The Wire. It's almost a trope nowadays to be outraged about Firefly. I'm more disappointed Almost Human or Jerimiah didn't get the love they clearly deserved.

And don't get me started about Counterpart.
Point taken but it was a natural that came to mind when talking about sci-fi. It
 
No, women do not love shows about being raped or being prostitutes.
Jerry Springer might disagree.
Here is a thing. Women tend to like cheap unscripted shows where women basically bitching about relationships and gossips.
These shows cost literally nothing to produce, all you need is a good relatable personality like Oprah.
Men generally like scripted, expensive to produce shows with actual plot which spans years.
Statement is without evidence.

The misogyny in this statement is appalling.
Don't call simple observations a misogyny.
SciFi (especially TV series) and Kardashians/Oprah are the two best discriminators of sex, They just are.
By what evidence??

Back up your statement.

And yes your statement shows sexism.
 
Wow, there's a lot of guys here that watched a lot of Oprah yet they think it's trash.
 
She has influence on culture and Russian politics? She can speak her mind and stay out of jail? I doubt that.
You asked for independent wealth and influence living in Russia.
1. She has independent wealth
2. She has influence (in business obviously)
3. She lives in Russia

Unlike US, in Russia, money don't give you much influence over politics.
It does not give you much influence over culture either, why would it?
She is not a writer or movie producer, or even singer.
 
No, women do not love shows about being raped or being prostitutes.
Jerry Springer might disagree.
Here is a thing. Women tend to like cheap unscripted shows where women basically bitching about relationships and gossips.
These shows cost literally nothing to produce, all you need is a good relatable personality like Oprah.
Men generally like scripted, expensive to produce shows with actual plot which spans years.
Statement is without evidence.

The misogyny in this statement is appalling.
Don't call simple observations a misogyny.
SciFi (especially TV series) and Kardashians/Oprah are the two best discriminators of sex, They just are.
By what evidence??

Back up your statement.

And yes your statement shows sexism.
Yeah, I know it's illegal to call anyone a woman or a man. It's sexism first degree.
 
Wow, there's a lot of guys here that watched a lot of Oprah yet they think it's trash.

I've only seen some of it because my mother watched her, but I didn't particularly care for the show. My mother also watched Dr. Phil, didn't particularly care for him either.
 
Wow, there's a lot of guys here that watched a lot of Oprah yet they think it's trash.

I did a google search to try to see how much criticism Oprah got on StormFront. From what I could observe, the comments there were about twice as bad as here. So, if it's any consolation, we could be doing a lot worse...
 
We probably all experience racial or sexual prejudice in some form or another. But it is mostly the young white men trying to get a college degree who do experience most of the prejudice these days.
Young Asian men get it worse.
 
Was Ms. Winfrey actually whining,
Her job is to maintain a fan base consisting of above average family income women who support her stupid business empire by watching her stupid show. And if whining is required then there will be whining.
An entertainer makes money by entertaining people? How is that supposed to somehow be stupid or evil?
 
A little quibble about Bill Gates.
The story I heard was that he did not inherit a lot of money.
His father said he would give him a good education.
And, the rest is up to him.
Same thing his grandfather did for Gates Sr.
That's a very popular story about successful people, in all fields and throughout history.

Which is an excellent reason to disbelieve it, in the absence of compelling evidence.

Do you have any compelling evidence?
Do you have any compelling evidence to the contrary? Where's any big chunk of change he started with?!

He had great luck in being at the right time and the right place combined with the skill to recognize the situation for what it was.
 
We probably all experience racial or sexual prejudice in some form or another. But it is mostly the young white men trying to get a college degree who do experience most of the prejudice these days.
What makes you believe that?
Racial preferences in higher education.
Your Ilk has dropped denying that it goes on, now they are arguing that it is a good thing to have e.g. more black doctors even if that means discriminating against white and Asian applicants to med school. Hostility on the Left to standardized tests and other objective measures over subjective measures like essays or "personality scores" is also part of this rot.
And note that when they tried getting rid of the objective measures during Covid they found the result was admissions even more favored the rich. Yes, they can game the SAT to some degree, but the fuzzier the measure the easier it is to game with money.
 
@RVonse started this thread, not some Dem.
Understood. But she was then loudly defended on here. I do not get the appeal.
But I have noticed that before. Rich celebrities (athletes, musicians etc.) tend to be supported on the Left as much as those who became rich starting or developing businesses (Kochs, Musk, Bezos) get demonized. Beyonce good, Bezos bad. Lebron James good, Larry Ellison bad.
The problem is the ones that do it by developing businesses tend to be too aggressive about it. There have been a lot of objections to Amazon's efforts to improve efficiency--sorry, but humans don't have 100% uptime! "Optimum" efficiency is brittle--and they blame the workers for when this happens.

Celebrities generally make their money by providing luxury value rather than by providing necessities.
 
Was Ms. Winfrey actually whining,
Her job is to maintain a fan base consisting of above average family income women who support her stupid business empire by watching her stupid show. And if whining is required then there will be whining.
An entertainer makes money by entertaining people? How is that supposed to somehow be stupid or evil?
I did not call her evil. As for stupid, Yes, I think her show is stupid.
 
Was Ms. Winfrey actually whining,
Her job is to maintain a fan base consisting of above average family income women who support her stupid business empire by watching her stupid show. And if whining is required then there will be whining.
An entertainer makes money by entertaining people? How is that supposed to somehow be stupid or evil?
I did not call her evil. As for stupid, Yes, I think her show is stupid.
Jackass:The Movie was stupid.

It made almost $80 million worldwide.

Just because you think something is stupid doesn't mean other people don't find it enjoyable, that it shouldn't be profitable, or that people who profited from producing and starring in it aren't allowed to speak of the hardships they faced along the way to achieving their fame and fortune.
 
We probably all experience racial or sexual prejudice in some form or another. But it is mostly the young white men trying to get a college degree who do experience most of the prejudice these days.
Young Asian men get it worse.
OMFG.

I’d say get a clue but a metric ton of them would be lost on the two of you.
 
We probably all experience racial or sexual prejudice in some form or another. But it is mostly the young white men trying to get a college degree who do experience most of the prejudice these days.
What makes you believe that?
Racial preferences in higher education.
Your Ilk has dropped denying that it goes on, now they are arguing that it is a good thing to have e.g. more black doctors even if that means discriminating against white and Asian applicants to med school. Hostility on the Left to standardized tests and other objective measures over subjective measures like essays or "personality scores" is also part of this rot.
And note that when they tried getting rid of the objective measures during Covid they found the result was admissions even more favored the rich. Yes, they can game the SAT to some degree, but the fuzzier the measure the easier it is to game with money.
Yep and it’s long been known that SAT scores are heavily correlated with the socioeconomic attainment of the parents.
 
Do you have any compelling evidence to the contrary?
Sure. I made it quite explicit in the post to which you were responding:

That's a very popular story about successful people, in all fields and throughout history.

Which is an excellent reason to disbelieve it, in the absence of compelling evidence.
 
Back
Top Bottom