Jarhyn
Wizard
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 17,036
- Gender
- Androgyne; they/them
- Basic Beliefs
- Natural Philosophy, Game Theoretic Ethicist
Like, did she not realize that "gun: basic edition" is like, 300 years old?I like the kind you have to throw at someone. That kind isn't often used in suicides, either.The kind that you have to put a new bullet in the gun every time you want to fire.Pistols are quite fancy, as firearms go. As are revolvers.What do you think constitutes a not-fancy firearm?
Then, is it too much to ask that someone at least need to operate a bolt and break their aim when firing from any position but prone before another round goes in?
There are functional behaviors such as full cycle reset that are only necessary to the goal "make a lot of dangerous shit happen a lot of times really fast, in that direction".
Self or public defense against anything less than that requires far less escalation with far less dangerous force.
If someone is armed with a knife, as I pointed out, a chair (a serious downgrade from a knife in terms of deadliness) is enough to stand off the knife wielder.
The same is true against wielders of axes, sticks, blowtorches, and other chairs.
Things start getting sketchy when you get into the realm of polearms, but fighting with a polearms surrounded by obstacles such as desks and chairs and tight spaces is going to be a chore anyway, and the chair-wielder side, if joined by friends, would still probably win out.
A sword would probably do the job of outclassing a simple chair, but it's also quite easy to identify a a sword, or for that matter a polearm, as a "heavy" weapon that doesn't belong in public.