• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

This is such an open and shut case.

Army Officer Who Heard Trump’s Ukraine Call Reported Concerns - The New York Times

A White House national security official who is a decorated Iraq war veteran plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he heard President Trump appeal to Ukraine’s president to investigate one of his leading political rivals, a request the aide considered so damaging to American interests that he reported it to a superior.
...
Even as he expressed alarm about the pressure campaign, the colonel and other officials worked to keep the United States relationship with Ukraine on track. At the direction of his superiors at the National Security Council, including John R. Bolton, then the national security adviser, Colonel Vindman drafted a memorandum in mid-August that sought to restart security aid that was being withheld from Ukraine, but Mr. Trump refused to sign it, according to documents reviewed by the Times.
 
What he did was wrong, but we don't think it is an impeachable offense.
 
What he did was wrong, but we don't think it is an impeachable offense.

Then how about the fact that he characterized what you [they] say is "wrong" as "perfect"?
Is THAT impeachable, or do you want a president who does "wrong" things 24/7 ?
 
What he did was wrong, but we don't think it is an impeachable offense.

Then how about the fact that he characterized what you [they] say is "wrong" as "perfect"?
Is THAT impeachable, or do you want a president who does "wrong" things 24/7 ?
I'm writing what the Senate GOP will be saying.

Actually, it's what they previously said and have since abandoned it, because it concedes guilt. Now it's all about how the process isn't legal.
 
This is such an open and shut case.

Army Officer Who Heard Trump’s Ukraine Call Reported Concerns - The New York Times

A White House national security official who is a decorated Iraq war veteran plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he heard President Trump appeal to Ukraine’s president to investigate one of his leading political rivals, a request the aide considered so damaging to American interests that he reported it to a superior.
...
Even as he expressed alarm about the pressure campaign, the colonel and other officials worked to keep the United States relationship with Ukraine on track. At the direction of his superiors at the National Security Council, including John R. Bolton, then the national security adviser, Colonel Vindman drafted a memorandum in mid-August that sought to restart security aid that was being withheld from Ukraine, but Mr. Trump refused to sign it, according to documents reviewed by the Times.

I read that article last night, but then this morning, I saw a clip from some of last night's Fox News pundits. They are already doing everything possible to demonize this man. They have no shame, and neither do the people who mindlessly believe whatever the Fox News pundits say. Will most of the Republicans in the Senate also try to demonize this man or any of the other people with outstanding credentials who have testified?
 
I'm writing what the Senate GOP will be saying.

Actually, it's what they previously said and have since abandoned it, because it concedes guilt. Now it's all about how the process isn't legal.
They'll be shifting back to it. At least in the Senate. Rep McCarthy won't seemingly be impressed up Trump says under oath he delayed payment for public Ukrainian investigation into Bidens.

Of course, we did see Conway with her shift in speech to no Quid Pro Quo was "intended".
 
Well, the shit show will never end.

article said:
“I applaud the Speaker for finally admitting it is an entire scam," McCarthy said. “You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.”

McCarthy said "a due process starts at the beginning," and claimed the impeachment inquiry would still be illegitimate despite the vote.
 
Well, the shit show will never end.

article said:
“I applaud the Speaker for finally admitting it is an entire scam," McCarthy said. “You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.”

McCarthy said "a due process starts at the beginning," and claimed the impeachment inquiry would still be illegitimate despite the vote.

Some people can do no right.

And why doesn’t someone put this asshole in his place about using the term “due process”? What due process is the subject of an impeachment inquiry entitled to? Whatever Speaker Nancy and her “sole power” wishes to give and nothing more.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

Some updates on today's testimony.


A leading House Republican drew the line on Tuesday at personal attacks on Colonel Vindman, sharply distancing herself from a flood of criticism of the decorated Army officer from conservative commentators who have publicly questioned his patriotism.

Oddly enough that was Liz Chaney, although she is still critical of the inquiry.


“We’re talking about decorated veterans who’ve served this nation, who’ve put their lives on the line, and it’s shameful to question their patriotism, their love of this nation, and we shouldn’t be involved in that process,” Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the third-ranking Republican, told reporters, unprompted at a morning news conference.

Within hours after Colonel Vindman’s damaging account of Mr. Trump’s dealings with Ukraine became public on Tuesday night, the president’s allies in the conservative news media began disparaging him, with some suggesting that he was a spy loyal to his native Ukraine, not the United States.

The Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham said during her broadcast on Monday night that Colonel Vindman was working inside the White House, “apparently against the president’s interest,” noting that he spoke Ukrainian. John Yoo, who worked in the White House Counsel’s Office under George W. Bush, agreed with Ms. Ingraham that the situation was “astounding,” adding, “some people might call that espionage.”

Brian Kilmeade, who hosts Fox & Friends, one of Mr. Trump’s favorite shows, said Tuesday morning of Colonel Vindman: “We also know he was born in the Soviet Union, emigrated with his family. Young. He tends to feel simpatico with the Ukraine.”

Sean P. Duffy, a former Republican representative from Wisconsin and pro-Trump commentator, also questioned Colonel Vindman’s loyalties, saying Tuesday during an appearance on CNN: “It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense — I don’t know that he’s concerned about American policy.”

“We all have an affinity to our homeland where we came from,” Mr. Duffy added.

Later on Twitter, Mr. Duffy appeared to walk back his remarks, praising Colonel Vindman’s service.

“Lt. Col. Vindman is an American war hero,” he wrote, adding, “My point is that Mr. Vindman is an unelected advisor, he gives ADVICE. President Trump sets the policy.”



Even as they prepare to move their case into public view, Democrats at the helm of the impeachment inquiry continued on Tuesday to add names to the queue of administration officials they are calling for private depositions.

The most high-profile among them was Robert Blair, a top national security adviser to Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Mr. Blair listened in on the July phone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on Mr. Mulvaney’s behalf, but did not raise concerns about what he heard at the time. Mr. Blair is also likely to have information about deliberations within the White House over the decision to suspend $391 million in security aid allocated for Ukraine.
 
Meanwhile, after months of yapping and yarping about the closed impeachment hearings from the GOP stooges, Pelosi just gave them what they wanted. Be careful what you yap for, you just might get it. Now the long parade of witnesses to Trump and his goons stunts will start to be open and the public can hear it for themselves. The initial hearings have lead to a long line of witnesses who will be asked to testify, and mounds of supporting evidence that will be subpoenaed. More barking and grunting from the GOP ahead to be sure.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/read-it-house-democrats-release-impeachment-inquiry-procedures/
 
Key witness to the Ukraine phone call refused to show up to testify.

Witch hunt confirmed, guys. Plain as day. The lying cowards can't even testify.
 
Eventually that witness will be dragged in to testify. Wearing an orange jumpsuit, handcuffs and leg irons. Meanwhile, many more people are in fact giving rather damning testimony. Sucks to be Trump. Or Giuliani. Or many other miscreants that were goons for the Trump administration.
 
It's a show trial!

Well, it's gotta be a something. Rethuglicans are fresh out of arguments against the facts or the law, so ...
When it goes to the Senate, it's going to be up to each individual pandering Republican scumbag to search his own soul for some hard voter-preference data, and a way to ignore every moral or ethical imperative. So let's put on a good show in the House - it's like a dress rehearsal.
 
Key witness to the Ukraine phone call refused to show up to testify.

Witch hunt confirmed, guys. Plain as day. The lying cowards can't even testify.
How does a witness not cooperating with a subpoena prove it's a baseless exercise in prosecution?
Now, if a credible witness showed up, willing to testify,munder oath, on Trump's side, with supporting documentation, but the House refused to hear his testimony, THAT might be a sign of a witch hunt. Esp. if they classified his supporting documentation so it could not be used.


People refusing to testify shows they might have something to h ide from the light of day.

You simply must stop taking these talking points uncritically, Halfie.
 
Key witness to the Ukraine phone call refused to show up to testify.

Witch hunt confirmed, guys. Plain as day. The lying cowards can't even testify.
How does a witness not cooperating with a subpoena prove it's a baseless exercise in prosecution?
Now, if a credible witness showed up, willing to testify,munder oath, on Trump's side, with supporting documentation, but the House refused to hear his testimony, THAT might be a sign of a witch hunt. Esp. if they classified his supporting documentation so it could not be used.


People refusing to testify shows they might have something to h ide from the light of day.

You simply must stop taking these talking points uncritically, Halfie.

It's a witch hunt because the guy who claims to have been the key witness to the Ukraine phone call is suddenly deciding not to testify. This means he knows he's a LIAR and doesn't want to commit perjury.

Think, Keith! He should've been whistling and dancing up to that stand.
 
Key witness to the Ukraine phone call refused to show up to testify.

Witch hunt confirmed, guys. Plain as day. The lying cowards can't even testify.
How does a witness not cooperating with a subpoena prove it's a baseless exercise in prosecution?
Now, if a credible witness showed up, willing to testify,munder oath, on Trump's side, with supporting documentation, but the House refused to hear his testimony, THAT might be a sign of a witch hunt. Esp. if they classified his supporting documentation so it could not be used.


People refusing to testify shows they might have something to h ide from the light of day.

You simply must stop taking these talking points uncritically, Halfie.

It's a witch hunt because the guy who claims to have been the key witness
wait, Kupperman claimed to be the key witness? Where? Or is that someone else's claim?
to the Ukraine phone call is suddenly deciding not to testify.
did he decide or did the White House order him not to testify?
This means he knows he's a LIAR and doesn't want to commit perjury.
um, aside from the fact you are always wrong, i see no reason to believe this.

He did not show up. Thst is a fact. Your speculation really really needs some citations.
Think, Keith! He should've been whistling and dancing up to that stand.
unless his boss is obstructing justice....
 
Key witness to the Ukraine phone call refused to show up to testify.

Witch hunt confirmed, guys. Plain as day. The lying cowards can't even testify.
How does a witness not cooperating with a subpoena prove it's a baseless exercise in prosecution?
Now, if a credible witness showed up, willing to testify,munder oath, on Trump's side, with supporting documentation, but the House refused to hear his testimony, THAT might be a sign of a witch hunt. Esp. if they classified his supporting documentation so it could not be used.


People refusing to testify shows they might have something to h ide from the light of day.

You simply must stop taking these talking points uncritically, Halfie.

It's a witch hunt because the guy who claims to have been the key witness to the Ukraine phone call is suddenly deciding not to testify. This means he knows he's a LIAR and doesn't want to commit perjury.

Think, Keith! He should've been whistling and dancing up to that stand.
The whistleblower wasn’t a witness to the call.
 
..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom