beero1000
Veteran Member
Nunes steps away from Russia collusion investigation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/politics/devin-nunes-house-intelligence-committee-russia.html
Uh oh
Nunes steps away from Russia collusion investigation.
article said:"I believe it is in the best interests of the House Intelligence Committee and the Congress for me to have Representative Mike Conaway, with assistance from Representatives Trey Gowdy and Tom Rooney, temporarily take charge of the Committee's Russia investigation while the House Ethics Committee looks into this matter," Nunes, a California Republican, said in a statement.
Rick Perry is currently in charge of our nukes.
Rick Perry is currently in charge of our nukes.
Fortunately Perry never studied history or Science. He thought duck and cover was a game for boys to see girls panties.
Nunes steps away from Russia collusion investigation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/politics/devin-nunes-house-intelligence-committee-russia.html
Uh oh
As I inferred, we need indefeasible evidence.
You don't always get what you "need". And you have no use for what you say you "need" anyhow. Those who actually need evidence have all they need.
Your position is obviously "indefeasible" (sic).
You don't always get what you "need". And you have no use for what you say you "need" anyhow. Those who actually need evidence have all they need.
Your position is obviously "indefeasible" (sic).
Of course we need evidence to support a point.
Of course we need evidence to support a point.
You and the frog in your pocket need evidence to support YOUR point.
Intelligence agencies need evidence to support theirs. They have it. You don't. The fact that you can't see their evidence does not cause it to cease to exist, your delusions notwithstanding.
You and the frog in your pocket need evidence to support YOUR point.
Intelligence agencies need evidence to support theirs. They have it. You don't. The fact that you can't see their evidence does not cause it to cease to exist, your delusions notwithstanding.
No I don't.
The person making the allegations needs to support an assertion.
No I don't.
No you don't WHAT? Need evidence? That's obvious. Your conclusions spring from your confirmation bias.
The person making the allegations needs to support an assertion.
Not to you. Don't like it? Tough shit.
And to hear this on an Atheist website. So if someone says God exists, the burden of proof is upon the person who can't see this or disagrees.
And to hear this on an Atheist website. So if someone says God exists, the burden of proof is upon the person who can't see this or disagrees.
Way to equate belief in magical beings with the existence of evidence adequate to convince 17 different, independent intelligence agencies.
Knowing that you believe in magical space aliens, I find that more than a little ironic.
(Hint: Magical space aliens don't exist. Evidence of Russian interference in US elections exists.)
Of course David Miscarriage need only offer "evidence" enough to convince superstitious fools. Intelligence agencies have to convince their rational members. But intelligence agencies have no obligation to convince superstitious members of fringe loony wacko pseudo-religions.
Way to equate belief in magical beings with the existence of evidence adequate to convince 17 different, independent intelligence agencies.
Knowing that you believe in magical space aliens, I find that more than a little ironic.
(Hint: Magical space aliens don't exist. Evidence of Russian interference in US elections exists.)
Of course David Miscarriage need only offer "evidence" enough to convince superstitious fools. Intelligence agencies have to convince their rational members. But intelligence agencies have no obligation to convince superstitious members of fringe loony wacko pseudo-religions.
By your reasoning I7 witch doctors would concur that a winged goblin at the chief cattle.
By your reasoning I7 witch doctors would concur that a winged goblin at the chief cattle.
Uh, that would be YOUR reasoning, whereby intelligence agencies = witch doctors. Most people who are not victims of fringe looney wacko pseudo-religions, know better.
But not you, nosiree!
They are using the logic of witch doctors.
The burden of proof stems from English and American laws.
Anyway since Trump authorised the rocket attacks on Syria, it means no more Russian kisses from Putin for a while and vica versa.
You have that backwards. Religious people would be able to prove "god exists" if it did. Atheists point out that it is impossible to prove something does NOT exist.I'm not even an atheist but an atheist will tell you, it's not possible to 'prove God exists.'
You have that backwards. Religious people would be able to prove "god exists" if it did. Atheists point out that it is impossible to prove something does NOT exist.I'm not even an atheist but an atheist will tell you, it's not possible to 'prove God exists.'
Now Trump learned that to gain popularity as a leader in the USA, just bomb someone.