The article says
"The charges against Mr. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, were not immediately clear".
So we still don't know yet. We know things are on when the lawyers representing the White House lawyers start hiring up lawyers for themselves. Actually looks like your article has been updated.
- conspiracy against the United States
- conspiracy to launder money
- being an unregistered agent of a foreign principal
- false and misleading FARA statements
- false statements
- seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts
Looks like Mueller is going for an easy chip shot. Proving conspiracy to launder money is going to be easier than proving the money laundering. Add these charges up and that has to be a decent amount of prison time. Chip shot for Manafort to turn on Kuschner/Trump or to at least give Mueller the keys to Russia.
I agree there are things we don't know and also things we cannot prove beyond a shadow of a doubt or even prove with clear and convincing evidence. Right now, though, I see this:
Mr. Gates is a longtime protégé and junior partner of Mr. Manafort. His name appears on documents linked to companies that Mr. Manafort’s firm set up in Cyprus to receive payments from politicians and businesspeople in Eastern Europe, records reviewed by The New York Times show.
Mr. Manafort had been under investigation for violations of federal tax law, money laundering and whether he appropriately disclosed his foreign lobbying.
...in concert with his being arrested and charged as a reasonable inference that his charges are related to "violations of federal tax law, money laundering, and [/or ... in]appropriately disclosed ... foreign lobbying." I cannot prove it since I don't have the evidence and no one is saying for a fact that's it. If he's being charged by Mueller's team, though, then I think it's related to the investigation, meaning what he's being investigated for. For example, he's not being charged with child porn. Now, is it possible he's been charged for something else tangentially related to the investigation? Yes, it's theoretically possible, but remember there's no evidence for that, the preponderance of evidence and the reason for probable cause and a warrant are related to the investigation as stated above. Thus and therefore lorem ipsum et cetera and other Latin phrases and ergo, the reasonable inference of which I wrote. All that being said, I will take a wait and see attitude and watch for news on the subject as well as ensure it is posted in the forum for updated information.