Shadowy Man
Contributor
this is not a given, considering the number of lawyers on the unindicted co-conspirator list.
His lawyers are not going to put their own liberty at risk for the orange turd;
this is not a given, considering the number of lawyers on the unindicted co-conspirator list.
His lawyers are not going to put their own liberty at risk for the orange turd;
I think there’s a domino effect once a few flip. Facts have to fit your story at the end of the day.this is not a given, considering the number of lawyers on the unindicted co-conspirator list.
His lawyers are not going to put their own liberty at risk for the orange turd;
Is he getting to the manic stage of his personality disorder?Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
So now that I have full Subpoena Power because of the Freedom of Speech Sham Indictment by Crooked Joe Biden, Deranged Jack Smith, and the DOJ, it has just been reported that the Unselect January 6th Committee of Political Hacks and Thugs has illegally destroyed their Records and Documents. This is unthinkable, and the Fake Political Indictment against me must be immediately withdrawn. The system is Rigged & Corrupt, very much like the Presidential Election of 2020. We are a
Nation in Decline!
"It has just been reported" is Trump speak for "I'm making it up."
Adderall Syndrome. The guy is an amphetamine junkie.Is he getting to the manic stage of his personality disorder?
"Re-establishing the same secure area that existed during President Trump’s term as President of the United States is a secure, efficient, and cost-effective way for these conversations to take place in a fully secure environment,” his attorneys wrote in the filing Wednesday.
Isn’t it also an admission that he lied about declassifying the documents?I'm not a lawyer. I am not an American (clearly). I have one ever so tiny question;
How in the living fuck is this not an admission of guilt?
Trump seeks to reestablish secure facility at Mar-a-Lago to review classified evidence
Donald Trump’s legal team is asking the government to reestablish a secure facility at Mar-a-Lago so that the former president can review classified discovery in the documents case. The filing come…thehill.com
"Re-establishing the same secure area that existed during President Trump’s term as President of the United States is a secure, efficient, and cost-effective way for these conversations to take place in a fully secure environment,” his attorneys wrote in the filing Wednesday.
Trump knew they weren't properly secured then. This is going to look real nice at trial.
I hope somebody asks him that. Preferably in a setting where Trump has to touch a bible before he answers.Isn’t it also an admission that he lied about declassifying the documents?
We all know the Bible is his favorite book.I hope somebody asks him that. Preferably in a setting where Trump has to touch a bible before he answers.Isn’t it also an admission that he lied about declassifying the documents?
WASHINGTON — Two prominent conservative law professors have concluded that Donald J. Trump is ineligible to be president under a provision of the Constitution that bars people who have engaged in an insurrection from holding government office. The professors are active members of the Federalist Society, the conservative legal group, and proponents of originalism, the method of interpretation that seeks to determine the Constitution’s original meaning.
The professors — William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — studied the question for more than a year and detailed their findings in a long article to be published next year in The University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
Whom would they need to convince to actually *disqualify* him from running?Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6
WASHINGTON — Two prominent conservative law professors have concluded that Donald J. Trump is ineligible to be president under a provision of the Constitution that bars people who have engaged in an insurrection from holding government office. The professors are active members of the Federalist Society, the conservative legal group, and proponents of originalism, the method of interpretation that seeks to determine the Constitution’s original meaning.
The professors — William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — studied the question for more than a year and detailed their findings in a long article to be published next year in The University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump.
The following TRUTH is a quote by highly partisan Judge Tanya Chutkan, angrily sentencing a J-6er in October of 2022. She obviously wants me behind bars. VERY BIASED & UNFAIR!
"I SEE THE VIDEOTAPES. I SEE THE FOOTAGE OF THE FLAGS AND THE SIGNS THAT PEOPLE WERE CARRYING AND THE HATS THAT THEY WERE WEARING, AND THE GARB. AND THE PEOPLE WHO MOBBED THAT CAPITOL WERE THERE IN FEALTY, IN LOYALTY, TO ONE MAN, NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION, OF WHICH MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO COME BEFORE ME SEEM WOEFULLY IGNORANT; NOT TO THE IDEALS OF THIS COUNTRY, AND NOT TO THE PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY. IT'S A BLIND LOYALTY TO ONE PERSON WHO, BY THE WAY, REMAINS FREE TO THIS DAY." Judge Tanya Chutkan!
Clarence? Gini?Whom would they need to convince to actually *disqualify* him from running?Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6
WASHINGTON — Two prominent conservative law professors have concluded that Donald J. Trump is ineligible to be president under a provision of the Constitution that bars people who have engaged in an insurrection from holding government office. The professors are active members of the Federalist Society, the conservative legal group, and proponents of originalism, the method of interpretation that seeks to determine the Constitution’s original meaning.
The professors — William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — studied the question for more than a year and detailed their findings in a long article to be published next year in The University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
I think there's a long list before getting to that point. For example, whoever makes the ballots in each county of each state. Whoever certifies election results, etc. I think that the situation is messy enough that the people who would need to be convinced (i.e., election officials in Trump-leaning counties) will be the least likely to be convinced. If a governor of a state overruled the election officials we're just leading further into the murk of people not trusting elections and a stronger division of the country politically.Clarence?Whom would they need to convince to actually *disqualify* him from running?Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6
WASHINGTON — Two prominent conservative law professors have concluded that Donald J. Trump is ineligible to be president under a provision of the Constitution that bars people who have engaged in an insurrection from holding government office. The professors are active members of the Federalist Society, the conservative legal group, and proponents of originalism, the method of interpretation that seeks to determine the Constitution’s original meaning.
The professors — William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — studied the question for more than a year and detailed their findings in a long article to be published next year in The University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
we're just leading further into the murk of people not trusting elections and a stronger division of the country politically.
Who would that help?PREDICTION:
If Trump is not on the ballot for the general election, then he will receive the most write-in votes of any candidate in any election, ever.
get out of FEDERAL jail "free", that is. I don't give MAGAts that much credit.... they will either not show up to vote or write him in, regardless.... IMO.Who would that help?PREDICTION:
If Trump is not on the ballot for the general election, then he will receive the most write-in votes of any candidate in any election, ever.
Prob’ly not the nominee.
If not nominated, Trump would give full-throated support to the Republican nominee; that person would be his get-out-of-jail-free card.