I'll take a nurse with an MSN or a Phd over most MDs when it comes to primary care/internal medicine.
The breath and depth or training are simply much bigger with MDs (or DOs) compared with nurses. It's not even close.
Nurses, nurse practitioners and physician assistants have their place in the healthcare system, but as supporting cast, not as independent providers. Unfortunately, many states have granted these "noctors" right to practice independently, to the detriment of patients.
They are usually much better at looking at the entire scope of what's going on with their patients compared to most MDs, who simply focus in on one or two symptoms without considering other factors.
[citation needed]
I have seen cases where noctors miss diagnoses because of their limited training.
When Your Doctor Isn’t a Doctor
Once Jeremy moved past his outrage, he noticed something unusual on the bill. The medical professional listed as treating Betty was Madeline Broemsen, P.N.P.-P.C. What’s that? Jeremy thought. He knew that physicians have a designation of M.D. (doctor of medicine) or D.O. (doctor of osteopathy). But a P.N.P.-P.C. is
something else entirely. Jeremy looked into it. More than one month after Betty died, the Wattenbargers learned that she had not been evaluated by a physician.
The woman with the stethoscope in the office? That was Madeline Broemsen, a nurse practitioner.
Broemsen missed the child's pneumonia and sepsis, leading to her death the next day.
Nobody is confused as to whether one is an MD or a APRN with a Phd. People choose whether they want an APRN or an MD to give them care, based on their preferences.
Are they? When NPs use the title "Dr." or when states foolishly give them ability to practice independently, confusion can ensue. Esp. when a clinic does not have actual physicians on staff.
Again, you seem to be insulting those who work in female dominated professions like nursing and or education,
No, I am not. I am pointing out that certain degrees are inferior, even if they are called "doctorates". A DNP is far inferior to MD or DO, regardless of gender. There are plenty of female physicians these days - it is not the 1950s!
Likewise, a PhD is superior to an EdD.
yet you claim not to be sexist.
I am not. My argument was gender invariant.
Sometimes people are not aware of their biases. I admit that based on my 42 years of working as an RN, I do have a strong bias in favor of APRNs and if necessary, female MDs.
I would take an MD over APRN any day to diagnose me. As I said, nurses and nurse practitioners are valuable members of a medical team, but they should not practice independently because of less training in medicine they receive.
And why preference for
female MDs over male physicians? It seems you are the sexist one!
Still, it might be good if we did away with all of these professional titles. I read that a lot of patients are starting to refer to their doctors by their first names and the docs don't like that. Poor, little babies.
Titles are important as they denote the level of training somebody has. Besides ...
When they all come to terms with the fact that they aren't that special, maybe Dr. Jill will decide to drop her title too.
My point is that there is big difference between different doctorates. Even outside medicine, a PhD in say physics is a lot different than an EdD.
it does seem a bit pretentious to me to demand everyone to refer to them as doctors.
There is a difference between a professional setting and a social one.
I think it may cause a barrier when it comes to communication. My best teachers in college wanted us to call them by their first names. Lawyers all have doctorate degrees, but I've yet to meet one yet that insists on being referred to as Dr..
I think it's tradition. They still have their professional titles like "esquire", which has its roots in the equestrian class of Ancient Rome. News media also usually refer to some lawyer as "Attorney such and such" and not "Mr. such and such".
I've always wondered why. Maybe they have the right idea. But, we are so far off topic now......
Yes, we are. Although the issue of independent practice for noctors is a political topic.
Trump's approval rating was 29% at the end of his term. Considering how divided the country has become, it's amazing that any politician has an approval rating over 35 or 40. Actually, I'm not sure if any of them do.
Both these men have low approval ratings, but according to
recent polls, Trump's is a hair better. But another issue of relevance to Biden's 2024 candidacy is his poor performance in the polls. Most nationwide polls have him trailing or even. That is concerning - given the structural advantage Republicans have in the Electoral College, the Dem candidate needs a 2-3 percentage points advantage in the national popular vote at least.
And, I don't understand how any atheist could support a Republican at this point in time, considering they are hoping and planning to have a theocratic form of government.
Some of their religious-based policies are indeed concerning, but "theorcratic form of government" is overselling it. Dems are harping on religion themselves too.