• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Race For 2024

It's all coming out now. How the Brandon administration lied and tried to cover up the state of Brandon's dementia.
Hilariously, Jake Tapper says he was lied to when he was a major part of the cover up. tut-tut Jake, you toady.
Dementia? No, what we were seeing was cancer.

And now we have a cancer in the US. Congress is about to make us a dictatorship.
 
I mean if Biden were this mentally challenged;

Surely you don't think Brandon is just fine and capable of serving a second term?!
Leaving the office vacant would be far less of a problem than what we have now. That Big Beautiful Bill is about giving us a Big Beautiful Dictatorship.
 
Despite a compliant MSM it was impossible to keep covering for Brandon’s decline.
Well, it appears they managed to cover his cancer at least.
Why do you assume he was even checked? At his age I certainly wouldn't check.

Pretty much any man who lives long enough gets it. Most of them die with it, not because of it.

At least in the past the numbers were clear: PSA testing reduces cancer mortality but doesn't reduce overall mortality. You kill as many from treatment, including going after non-cancers, as you save from the cancer. And there's definite quality of life issues from going after it.

I had made it clear to my previous PCP that I didn't want the PSA test. Unfortunately, she moved and I didn't make it clear to the new doc. I've been down the workup for elevated PSA--which found nothing but an incidental that pretty much says my heart is going to get me before my prostate will. Genetics that doesn't care one bit that I'm a lot more fit than most people that end up in a cardiologists office.
 
Let me explain a few things to you, since you are obviously ignorant regarding how/when men are tested for prostate cancer. They are rarely checked after the age of 70 because prostate cancer after that age rarely becomes serious. Biden had his last last test for prostate cancer in 2014
You are BSing. Demented piece of shit has last stage and this is rare to get last stage all of a sudden, especially for POTUS.
The whole idea of testing is to detect before last stage.
Check the numbers on the testing.


It's the only one I'm aware of that actually looks at overall mortality. Many other papers talk about overdiagnosis but this is the only source that I'm aware of that tries to look at the impact of that overdiagnosis.
 
POTUS is not an ordinary man.
If what you insinuate is true. Then all these health checks of presidents are jokes.
Ordinary or not doesn't change the risk/benefit of testing.
Basically, what you you are implying - Old people are not checked for anything because they will die soon anyway. Well, at least that explains these checkup reports he had while POTUS.
They did not find anything because they did not look for anything.

LP, and why do you always reply with such delay?
 
Biden is just an older adult who often forgets names,
Are you OK?
Race is over and facts about Biden's dementia and cover-up are slowly leaking out
I just posted an opinion piece that came out this month comparing both Biden and Trump's cognitive decline. It's very obvious that despite Biden showing some signs that most older adults have when it comes to cognitive decline, Trump's symptoms are far worse. Ddi you ever bother to read the link I posted? I could find a lot more, but if you really cared and were open minded, you could do your own research.

Btw, the so called facts are simply about Biden's old age. So far, no physician has diagnosed him with dementia, but since he is no longer president and he did step aside after his terrible debate, it doesn't matter. I'm just pointing out that we now have a president who's cognitive decline is much worse than the former president. Even if Biden, like Reagan did have some signs of dementia, Biden would have at least listened to qualified advisors instead of trying to be a dictator, making shit up and working towards destroying everything that was good about the US. That's all I have to say to you as I have no more time to waste.
And what I see in Biden is not dementia, but that he runs out of energy before he runs out of day. Everyone's ability to cope with a long, hard day declines with time, throw in some time zones and you can go from competent in the morning to zombie at night. The sort of thing that tends to happen to cancer patients...
 
hey are not definitively indicative of dementia.
What part of the above did you miss?
Exactly. What we see with Biden looks like a lack of energy, not a lack of mind. The symptoms of dementia include many of the symptoms of a lack of energy but that doesn't mean dementia is the cause.
 
And what I see in Biden is not dementia, but that he runs out of energy before he runs out of day.
Are you saying you had access to Biden and was following him during the day?
To me it looks like he "runs out of energy" in 5 minutes after waking up.
Some leader of the Free World my ass.
And let's assume you're right. Piece of shit had obvious cancer symptoms (according to you) and was passing medical checks with flying colors. Are you sure it's better than dementia?
 
And what I see in Biden is not dementia, but that he runs out of energy before he runs out of day.
Are you saying you had access to Biden and was following him during the day?
To me it looks like he "runs out of energy" in 5 minutes after waking up.
Some leader of the Free World my ass.
And let's assume you're right. Piece of shit had obvious cancer symptoms (according to you) and was passing medical checks with flying colors. Are you sure it's better than dementia?
Biden is still riding his bike.

Thanks for the diagnosis, Dr. Kildare.
 
The Dark Enlightenment Coup

The missing votes uncovered in Smart Elections’ legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the iceberg—an iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas.

On Monday, an investigator’s story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.

These changes were labeled “de minimis”—a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.

That revelation is a shock to the public.
But for those who’ve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn’t the headline—it’s the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain—between tech giants and Donald Trump.
Donal Trump said:
He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.
I'm far from believing there was rigging in the 2024 election and if it could be done I have absolutely no doubt Trump would do it. So it seems like a good subject for discussion.
 
Once again, the Exit Polling would have to have been fixed too, as it matched the election outcome rather closely (in close elections).
 
The Dark Enlightenment Coup

The missing votes uncovered in Smart Elections’ legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the iceberg—an iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas.

On Monday, an investigator’s story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.

These changes were labeled “de minimis”—a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.

That revelation is a shock to the public.
But for those who’ve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn’t the headline—it’s the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain—between tech giants and Donald Trump.
Donal Trump said:
He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.
I'm far from believing there was rigging in the 2024 election and if it could be done I have absolutely no doubt Trump would do it. So it seems like a good subject for discussion.
The votes match the polling. And it's hard to get a lot of votes by rigging machines.

I do agree 2024 was stolen but it was by vote suppression, not vote manipulation.
 
Donald Trump is leaving little doubt about who’s president right now, but in one corner of the country, a lawsuit is helping to fan skepticism about the results of the 2024 general election.

The case against Rockland County, New York, claims that there were irregularities in the county’s vote tallies, judging in part by what the plaintiffs characterize as statistical anomalies — notably the mismatch in support between Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and the person at the top of the party’s ticket, Vice President Kamala Harris. Gillibrand won the suburban county by about 8,000 votes, while Harris lost to Trump by more than 17,000.

The plaintiffs say it’s a suspicious pattern of ticket-splitting that suggests vote-rigging or errors, an echo of the spurious claims made by Trump allies when he lost several swing states in 2020. They want the court to invalidate the Senate and presidential election results and order the county to redo the election.

A state court dismissed most of the plaintiffs’ requests in March, but Justice Rachel Tanguay is allowing discovery in the case to proceed after the county Board of Elections acknowledged it might amend its response. (The original plaintiffs included a third-party senatorial candidate, two voters, and an activist group that has long opposed some voting machines, though only the activist group remains.) So the case continues for now.

Unlike Trump in 2020, Harris herself hasn’t amplified the lawsuit’s claims about 2024. And many experts say there’s no reason to question the validity of the election results, in Rockland County or elsewhere.
 
Donald Trump is leaving little doubt about who’s president right now, but in one corner of the country, a lawsuit is helping to fan skepticism about the results of the 2024 general election.

The case against Rockland County, New York, claims that there were irregularities in the county’s vote tallies, judging in part by what the plaintiffs characterize as statistical anomalies — notably the mismatch in support between Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and the person at the top of the party’s ticket, Vice President Kamala Harris. Gillibrand won the suburban county by about 8,000 votes, while Harris lost to Trump by more than 17,000.

The plaintiffs say it’s a suspicious pattern of ticket-splitting that suggests vote-rigging or errors, an echo of the spurious claims made by Trump allies when he lost several swing states in 2020. They want the court to invalidate the Senate and presidential election results and order the county to redo the election.

A state court dismissed most of the plaintiffs’ requests in March, but Justice Rachel Tanguay is allowing discovery in the case to proceed after the county Board of Elections acknowledged it might amend its response. (The original plaintiffs included a third-party senatorial candidate, two voters, and an activist group that has long opposed some voting machines, though only the activist group remains.) So the case continues for now.

Unlike Trump in 2020, Harris herself hasn’t amplified the lawsuit’s claims about 2024. And many experts say there’s no reason to question the validity of the election results, in Rockland County or elsewhere.
That seems silly to me. It's one of the weaknesses of FPTP voting. It's essentially the same thing that happened in 2000, particularly in FL where Nader got more votes than the margin by which Bush won. Arguably, people who voted for Nader would have preferred Gore to Bush... but that's not how FPTP works.

Trump ally claims were idiotic in 2020. These are just as idiotic now.

Although... maybe we'll finally wise up and start changing how we do voting to something more like ranked choice or condorcet.
 
Back
Top Bottom