One of the things they teach in officer-school is that the biggest problem with leading enlisted is they don't know what they want, but thrry sure as fuck know what they do not want.
My company has made an effort to reduce this dichotomy to an algorithm. This is my team's summation of an example problem.
Consider the problem of literally leading a group of enlisted on travel between two identified points on a map, along a specified route.
The service unit knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or "deviation". The deviation will be marked in submission to the officer.
"Where the fuck are we?" Or perhaps, "Can _I_ hold the map for just a minute, LT?"
The officer uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the unit from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the trip has required a "variation". The variation being the difference between where the unit is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the officer.
However, the unit must also know where it was. The unit satisfaction scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the unit has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "the officer fucked us."
This part is seldom expressed directly to the officer, though it will be an unavoidable subcurrent to all interactions.
"Let's turn 30 degrees to port."
"Yes, LT, that will help. Uh huh."