- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 42,073
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
My timing was a little off. It looks like April will be the worst of it and then May should be the downhill part of the curve and then by June 1 (possibly a roaring speech by Trump announcing the re-opening of the economy for Memorial Day weekend) the economy will be roaring ready for a nice 5 months of smooth sailing right into Trump's 2nd term.
There's no such thing as " picking winners." The winner would be the world community were a cure, or at least a treatment be discovered. There are various government as well as privately funded scientific labs working on a vaccine throughout the Western world at least.
Methinks were the US trials to prove successful in making a vaccine, the left would be devastated in case it would help re-elect the Donald. The left would rather see people die if it helps their cause! Is that the depravity the Dems have slunk to?
Man the bullshit is just flinging at record levels. Trump isn’t a doctor. Almost all doctors don’t think it will work. And people are being used as needless guinea pigs for a medication that won’t work, clogging up the chances to actually find a treatment.
It is migraine inducing madness.
Medication that won't work, and your qualifications for making such a statement are...................................? In such a crisis as this Pandemic, isn't every angle, every formula of past and new promising experiment worth a try?
Beware, this is infected with Covfefe-19.
Why should we care what that lying sack of shit says?
(With apologies to shit, at least shit is fertilizer.)
Okay, ignore what " the sack of shit" has to say. But What about what the experts in that press conference have to say? Because they're sharing the podium with the " sack of shit" they should also just shut the f up?
Medication that won't work, and your qualifications for making such a statement are...................................? In such a crisis as this Pandemic, isn't every angle, every formula of past and new promising experiment worth a try?
No, it's not.
In 1918, doctors resorted to blood-letting. Which had been the standard treatment for fever up until a few years earlier.
Treatment that's not known to work almost invariably breaks the Hippocratic principle to "first do no harm". No medication (even ineffective ones) is without harmful side effects.
Contradict him, upstage him, argue with him, get more attention than him, show him to be dumber than a bag of hammers, make promises/predictions/prophecize w/out his approval.Okay, ignore what " the sack of shit" has to say. But What about what the experts in that press conference have to say? Because they're sharing the podium with the " sack of shit" they should also just shut the f up?
They're not allowed to contradict him.
The numbers fit an exponential curve almost perfectly, though I checked United States Coronavirus: 321,337 Cases and 9,128 Deaths - Worldometer for other days' numbers. The exponential fit is still justified, though the slope is now less than before about mid-March.On March 27, the United States hit the 100,000 case benchmark. On April 1, the number of Americans infected doubled to more than 200,000 cases. Just three days later, on Saturday, positive COVID-19 cases topped 300,000.
To respond, Trump said he's deploying 1,000 medical military personnel to New York, the epicenter of the United States outbreak. Reinforcing his hope for the use of the malaria drug, hydroxychloroquine, in treatment against COVID-19, Trump said the United States is stockpiling 29 million does of the drug.
"What do you have to lose? Take it," Trump said of hydroxychloroquine.
...
Dr. Deborah Birx, who serves on the White House coronavirus task force, said the modeling shows that the three major hotspots the country in New York, Detroit and Louisiana will peak in the next six or seven days. She urged vigilance in social distancing to mitigate the spread.
Thus was born the nation's most comprehensive pandemic plan -- a playbook that included diagrams for a global early warning system, funding to develop new, rapid vaccine technology, and a robust national stockpile of critical supplies, such as face masks and ventilators, Townsend said.
The effort was intense over the ensuing three years, including exercises where cabinet officials gamed out their responses, but it was not sustained. Large swaths of the ambitious plan were either not fully realized or entirely shelved as other priorities and crises took hold.
...
"If we wait for a pandemic to appear," he warned, "it will be too late to prepare. And one day many lives could be needlessly lost because we failed to act today."
It's not as though the novel coronavirus hasn't touched each of their states in some way. Yet a combination of states' rights defiance, persuasion from some business and agricultural leaders and a largely rural composition have branded these governors as outliers during a moment of national crisis, where the actions of one potentially affect all.
My timing was a little off. It looks like April will be the worst of it and then May should be the downhill part of the curve and then by June 1 (possibly a roaring speech by Trump announcing the re-opening of the economy for Memorial Day weekend) the economy will be roaring ready for a nice 5 months of smooth sailing right into Trump's 2nd term.
This is perhaps the most nonsensical thing you have ever posted (and it certainly has a lot of competition).
If indeed we level off in that timeframe, it will mean that we haven't overtaxed the heathcare system, which is good. But we won't be able to reopen the economy until there's a widely available vaccine (or until everyone has caught the disease and either died or recovered, assuming recovery confers immunity).
if you reopen too soon, that flattened curve will take off again.
What, exactly, do you mean by 'already?'My timing was a little off. It looks like April will be the worst of it and then May should be the downhill part of the curve and then by June 1 (possibly a roaring speech by Trump announcing the re-opening of the economy for Memorial Day weekend) the economy will be roaring ready for a nice 5 months of smooth sailing right into Trump's 2nd term.
This is perhaps the most nonsensical thing you have ever posted (and it certainly has a lot of competition).
If indeed we level off in that timeframe, it will mean that we haven't overtaxed the heathcare system, which is good. But we won't be able to reopen the economy until there's a widely available vaccine (or until everyone has caught the disease and either died or recovered, assuming recovery confers immunity).
if you reopen too soon, that flattened curve will take off again.
Cases are already slowing down. This is exciting news.
What, exactly, do you mean by 'already?'Cases are already slowing down. This is exciting news.
THE shutdown? Which shutdown would that be, Halfie?What, exactly, do you mean by 'already?'Cases are already slowing down. This is exciting news.
The shutdown hasn't even been issued for a month yet and we are already in decline, Keith.
What a sick obsession. Are thousands of people supposed to die for Wall Street?To be sure, it wasn’t quite as bad as it could have been. Trump did not again call coronavirus concern a “hoax” perpetrated by his political opponents, or compare it to the common flu, or suggest that it would “miraculously” disappear on its own very soon. His tone was appropriately solemn. But he could not resist boasting and preening about the U.S. response and falling back on his nativist comfort zone.
...
He did not even declare a national state of emergency — something he has previously done for the southern border and cybersecurity. An emergency declaration could give Trump broader powers to mobilize the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the military, among other resources, but Politico reports that Trump is concerned it “could hamper his narrative that the coronavirus is similar to the seasonal flu and could further agitate Wall Street.” Actually, it’s Trump’s failure to take decisive action that is agitating Wall Street, with stocks in free fall the morning after his speech. Trump is heightening, not ameliorating, pandemic panic.
Trump recently claimsd that only 100,000 dying of the virus is a sign that he is doing a "good job".With his catastrophic mishandling of the coronavirus, Trump has established himself as the worst president in U.S. history.
His one major competitor for that dubious distinction remains Buchanan, whose dithering helped lead us into the Civil War — the deadliest conflict in U.S. history. Buchanan may still be the biggest loser. But there is good reason to think that the Civil War would have broken out no matter what. By contrast, there is nothing inevitable about the scale of the disaster we now confront.
Several other countries have done *much* better. Like Taiwan, Singapore, Canada, South Korea, Georgia and Germany.No, it will be a sign that he’s a miserable failure, because the coronavirus is the most foreseeable catastrophe in U.S. history. The warnings about the Pearl Harbor and 9/11 attacks were obvious only in retrospect. This time, it didn’t require any top-secret intelligence to see what was coming. The alarm was sounded in January by experts in the media and by leading Democrats including presumptive presidential nominee Joe Biden.
What pettiness and spitefulness.This fiasco is so monumental that it makes our recent failed presidents — George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter — Mount Rushmore material by comparison. Trump’s Friday night announcement that he’s firing the intelligence community inspector general who exposed his attempted extortion of Ukraine shows that he combines the ineptitude of a George W. Bush or a Carter with the corruption of Richard Nixon.
Trump is characteristically working hardest at blaming others — China, the media, governors, President Barack Obama, the Democratic impeachment managers, everyone but his golf caddie — for his blunders. His mantra is: “I don’t take responsibility at all.”
https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/resea...cc=evening_update&mpweb=755-8750872-720425075
Researchers may have found coronavirus’ Achilles’ heel
Where's the link to the story in "Science"?
Would it that blame eliminated the virus. Then doing so would be seen as useful and helpful. It doesn't and it isn't and it won't be seen as such.
https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/resea...cc=evening_update&mpweb=755-8750872-720425075
Researchers may have found coronavirus’ Achilles’ heel
Where's the link to the story in "Science"?
Does it have to be in the Science journal? Why doubt this report while not questioning say, the New York Times?
https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/researchers-may-have-found-coronavirus-achilles-heel/
Well, there is no need to link to the Science article, when you didn't bother to read the NY Post article.https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/resea...cc=evening_update&mpweb=755-8750872-720425075
Researchers may have found coronavirus’ Achilles’ heel
Where's the link to the story in "Science"?
Does it have to be in the Science journal? Why doubt this report while not questioning say, the New York Times?
https://nypost.com/2020/04/04/researchers-may-have-found-coronavirus-achilles-heel/