• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Which movie did you watch today and how would you rate it?

Triple 9 7/10

I was reminded of -The Town, with the crazy stunts and robberies. Norman Reedus doesn't go far from what he is most commonly known as, which is an oily badass with weapons. He is good though. Other characters are good, like Aaron Paul from Breaking Bad. His role in this movie is to be the guy who used to play Jesse in Breaking Bad. He slayed it.

Cops are corrupt and banks are fun to rob. The Feds are powerless and Russians run this shit. Latino gangs are dangerous. That is one important reality in the movie, and in life. I'm glad they reminded me.

I like high budget crime thrillers with popular actors and cruel plots. Watching this was a little saddening. The fate of the characters wasn't sad, it was the way the world is portrayed that came off as a little shitty and frustrating. It moved so fast that I didn't have a lot of time to think, so no problem.

I'll own this movie eventually, just because it is a high level heist flick, up there with The Town. I use The Town to compare because the implausible action flows similarly. Banks get robbed. The aren't many other ways to connect the two.
 
Ant Man

Thought it would suck, but it didn't. It's a tad sappy, but overall it was entertaining and imaginative. To me that's kind of the paradox of superhero flicks. A lot of imagination went into the creation of the original characters but the movies are boring and predictable as hell. But Ant Man touches on some cool science stuff, has some solid characters, and really takes advantage of the dynamics between the tiny and the large.

6.5/10
 
Gorky Park

8/10

A well-done adaptation of Martin Cruz Smith's novel of the same title. William Hurt is very good as the protagonist, Arkady Renko, the Moscow militia investigator who featured in several further novels by Smith. The pacing drags at times, and Lee Marvin is badly miscast, but otherwise the supporting cast is terrific--Brian Dennehy, Ian Bannen, Ian McDiarmid, and Joanna Pacula in her first major role. The score from James Horner is also splendid.
 
The Way Back

5/10.

It was (according to the opening credits) inspired by the story of - and dedicated to - a handful of men who escaped a Siberian gulag and walked 4,000 miles to freedom during WWII.


Well the movie didn't do their story justice. And that's sad, because it was a great story, I'm a fan of Ed Harris, and think that Peter Weir is a great director. This just missed the mark on so many levels.
 
The Jungle Book - 7/10

A really enjoyable and well done movie. Having a kid interact with nothing but animated animals could have failed spectacularly, but they made it work. I find it difficult to credit how a bear, a panther and a pack of wolves could lose a fight with a tiger, but it fits with the narrative.


Also, they did kind of brush over the bit how the kid burned down the entire jungle and proved how the tiger was absolutely 100% correct in his concerns and they'd all have been better off if Mogli had been eaten as a child. Shere Khan was like Batman - willing to do the difficult and unpopular thing in pursuit of the greater good.

 
The Blair Witch Project (1999)

I enjoyed it. The tension and dread rises and then things go awfully bad.

It dragged a little and suffered from repetition.

I've only seen two other found footage style of films (Cloverfield and Trollhunter), so I am not yet bored with this.

Oh wait, I've also seen Europa Report, which was also found footage in a way.

In summary: tension, dread, enjoyable.

7/10
 
Last edited:
The Blair Witch Project (1999)

I enjoyed it. The tension and dread rises and then things go awfully bad.

It dragged a little and suffered from repetition.

I've only seen two other found footage style of films (Cloverfield and Trollhunter), so I am not yet bored with this.

Oh wait, I've also seen Europa Report, which was also found footage in a way.

In summary: tension, dread, enjoyable.

7/10

I found it spooky but the things that ruined it for me

were 1) that one of the characters threw away the map, while they're in trackless woods, just because he was pissed at another character. Now that's just all kinds of just cartoon character stupid and 2) because none of them think to follow the brook. That's almost always a surefire way to avoid going in circles.

 
The Blair Witch Project (1999)

I enjoyed it. The tension and dread rises and then things go awfully bad.

It dragged a little and suffered from repetition.

I've only seen two other found footage style of films (Cloverfield and Trollhunter), so I am not yet bored with this.

Oh wait, I've also seen Europa Report, which was also found footage in a way.

In summary: tension, dread, enjoyable.

7/10

Haven't you seen Paranormal Activity? Canibal Holocaust was the first to use this device. Hasn't aged well but is interesting for historical reasons
 
The Blair Witch Project (1999)

I enjoyed it. The tension and dread rises and then things go awfully bad.

It dragged a little and suffered from repetition.

I've only seen two other found footage style of films (Cloverfield and Trollhunter), so I am not yet bored with this.

Oh wait, I've also seen Europa Report, which was also found footage in a way.

In summary: tension, dread, enjoyable.

7/10

I found it spooky but the things that ruined it for me

were 1) that one of the characters threw away the map, while they're in trackless woods, just because he was pissed at another character. Now that's just all kinds of just cartoon character stupid and 2) because none of them think to follow the brook. That's almost always a surefire way to avoid going in circles.



I assumed that they were going in circles due to the witch's involvement. Some kind of spell, etc. I don't think standard logic works when witches are involved :) And that includes throwing away the map.



- - - Updated - - -

Haven't you seen Paranormal Activity? Canibal Holocaust was the first to use this device. Hasn't aged well but is interesting for historical reasons

Nope. I avoid most of the horror genre. I did like The Babadook. But that's not found footage.
 
Caligula (?/10)

Continuing my theme of Roman dramas I can find on Youtube I found the excellent 1979 version of Caligula. Aka, the best porn movie ever made. Whether it's porn with good acting or a serious film with porn sequences is a matter of definition. What this film proves is why it's a bad idea to combine. I don't know how other people work but for me, pornography shuts my brain off. All blood rushes to my genitals or something. So the acting is a bit wasted. Makes it a bit hard to grade. It's certainly worth watching, if only for historical value. Really gorgeous in every way. Love the clip with the execution machine.

The porn sequences are masterfully shot (as is the rest of it). I wish more porn was shot by great director as this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU5piTnA6EQ
 
Caligula (?/10)

Continuing my theme of Roman dramas I can find on Youtube I found the excellent 1979 version of Caligula. Aka, the best porn movie ever made. Whether it's porn with good acting or a serious film with porn sequences is a matter of definition. What this film proves is why it's a bad idea to combine. I don't know how other people work but for me, pornography shuts my brain off. All blood rushes to my genitals or something. So the acting is a bit wasted. Makes it a bit hard to grade. It's certainly worth watching, if only for historical value. Really gorgeous in every way. Love the clip with the execution machine.

The porn sequences are masterfully shot (as is the rest of it). I wish more porn was shot by great director as this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU5piTnA6EQ

I have the unrated version. It's hard to believe they didn't start off PLANNING a porn movie considering how short a tunic Caligula wears.
 
Caligula (?/10)

Continuing my theme of Roman dramas I can find on Youtube I found the excellent 1979 version of Caligula. Aka, the best porn movie ever made. Whether it's porn with good acting or a serious film with porn sequences is a matter of definition. What this film proves is why it's a bad idea to combine. I don't know how other people work but for me, pornography shuts my brain off. All blood rushes to my genitals or something. So the acting is a bit wasted. Makes it a bit hard to grade. It's certainly worth watching, if only for historical value. Really gorgeous in every way. Love the clip with the execution machine.

The porn sequences are masterfully shot (as is the rest of it). I wish more porn was shot by great director as this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU5piTnA6EQ

I have the unrated version. It's hard to believe they didn't start off PLANNING a porn movie considering how short a tunic Caligula wears.

The story I heard is that all the porn shots were added afterwards once all other shooting was complete. It was done in complete secrecy. Because the director knew none of the serious actors would be cool with it. Revealed only on the actual premier. So nobody knew. Not even the people who marketed it. The director had no ambition to work in Hollywood again, so he didn't care. And he didn't
 
Cleveland Abduction

I'm in too much of a shock to rate it. Not sure what to think. This is about Ariel Castro's abduction of three young girls and keeping them captive in his house for over ten years. This really happened and this is one of those films based on a true story where all the film did was to tone it down. Because the reality violates everything sacred and decent. It would be unfilmable and unwatchable. I came to it having read Michelle Knight's memoirs, "Finding Me: A Decade of Darkness, a Life Reclaimed: a Memoir of the Cleveland Kidnappings". But prepare well for it because you will have nightmares. I can't recall ever reading anything that shocked me as much as that. The film of it was also horrific. But the book is way worse.
 
The VVitch 7/10

I'm not a big horror movie fan, but the historical effort towards speech, set, costumes etc appealed to me. As it turns out, it's not so much a horror movie as a psychological thriller.

An English family in colonial New England leaves the colony over theological differences and settles isolated in a remote area. Evil things begin to happen, and the family falls apart.

The acting, cinematography and music are immaculate.

Contains Spoilers...


At first, I found it confusing because due to the historical accuracy emphasis I expected the same wrt witchcraft. But the witch and Satan, in the form of a goat, are presented as real. After rewatching it I realized that the Witch was a stand in or symbol for misfortune or despair and that the real drama was the effect of death and disease on the family members and their struggle to remain together and not be consumed by events.

 
Star Wars VII - The Revenue Awakens (spoilers, but I was the last human to see it so that shouldn't be trouble)

Okay, now when I heard that this film had taken bits and pieces of the first Star Wars chapter... I mean the fourth... the one with Luke Skywalker... what I thought that meant was that bits and pieces were taken, not the entire fucking film! It is one thing to hat tip a film... or make a few hat tips, but to use nearly the same exact outline? If the title of the film didn't have Star Wars in the name, there would have been a lawsuit!

The movie starts off badly. The local village is landed in with a few ships and storm troopers come out. And all I can think is "Oh my god! Stormtroopers, how will we ever defend ourselves!"

Then we are introduced quickly to the new baddie, also known as McDonald's Drive Up Order Voice Guy. "I want to be real bad... that'll be $17.21, please pull up to the window." What is with the face shields and helmets?! Could they stick with one original thing here? Vader had a helmet because he was jacked up in the last chapter, I mean third chapter. He had too much Vader in him... the film had too much A New Hope in it.

Oh, and the storm trooper that was kidnapped as a kid and became a stormtrooper because apparently that is how it works now. He magically has an epiphany right at the start of the film and decides the murder and mayhem (this is the first time according to the Mommy Stormtrooper) just wasn't him anymore because someone smeared blood on his helmet, something he wouldn't have actually known, because you know... helmet. And seriously, seeing a Stormtrooper die is mentally debilitating? He should have been as used to it as waking up in the morning. Stormtroopers have the worst life expectancy in the Universe, worse than Haitians. According to the UN, a stormtrooper usually doesn't make it to see the age of 25. And the lucky ones get taunted by the leadership, putting them into higher positions of power with harder to see through helmets (think near the end of the film).

But back to the epiphanied stormtrooper, he quickly gets in cahoots with this great awesome pilot who apparently couldn't be found for 3/4's of the filming of the movie, because he just kind of disappears (you are supposed to presume he is dead, but you know he isn't because this is a poorly written film). Thankfully he did survive because he was thrown from the ship which had a primarily intact body where he was and the parachute was stuck inside it (remember back when you were supposed to think he died? because that is why they showed that, to make you think he died, but he didn't! He was inexplicably thrown from a vehicle with no hole big enough to do so). Did the writers of 2012 get involved with this film?

The best thing about this movie, short of the plagiarizing it did of the first script was how shit just happened. How apparently using the force isn't that hard... and heck, a poor girl in the middle of nowhere that clearly didn't have a blu-ray player to watch the previous films would know that mind control was even possible forget a newbie thing that could be done.

And Luke will be pissed. She arrives to find him and all of a sudden learns that she knows everything... fuck, probably can cheat death too now! What is left to teach her?



And of course, the end of the film is a bit too celebratory despite the massive losses inflicted both in the final attack and oh yeah, the home world was blown to bits (you may have remembered that happening before).

Can we talk about Han Solo? It was nice while it lasted, but I was hoping that maybe he'd have a more definitive presence in the film primarily...

...well one where he doesn't puss out. Surprised he didn't suggest his son should take yoga. "Son, I love you. Try yoga, that could help for your anger issues." The film seemed to be clearly foreshadowing him knowing he won't make it back, so you are expecting some grand sacrifice for the cause. Nope... "Seriously, son, yoga will really help stabilize your mind." *stabby*


What a fucking waste of a character. It'd be like having Boba Fett getting cold cocked and eaten by a massive buried desert beast! And I'm not even going to get into how Solo just appears to steal back the Millennium Falcon. He was searching for it, and BOOM! right there? What, did the guy pass him? And then of course, the piece of garbage machine turns out to work just fine for the entire movie.

And where are the dead Jedi's? Remember how there are supposed to be four of them (despite the fact that Vader shouldn't have known how to evade death because that was a special thing Yoda taught Obi Wan (after Moo Goo Gai Pan... I mean Rae Don Chong... Quinoa Jinn, yeah I think that was it) taught Yoda how he did it?). Granted, I suppose ignoring that actual piece of plot line that could have legitimately been used (and not considered lifting) to help the hero in the script could have been an attempt to not entirely rip off the first film.

And of course, the ending, the final attack run (oh hey guys, remember we were attacking that thing? Apparently there is another hole in it now, maybe we should do something about that? Maybe blow that thing up?) And then they go in and repeat the ending of Star Wars IV. That would have been a hat tip to the original film, had they not stolen the remainder of the film:
- Young adult in desert world with nothing left there for them (I have to get back, I'm waiting for Godot.) This is a two-fer because it steals from IV and I!
- Another planet exterminating weapon.
- Runs into an unwilling partner (remember Han Solo from the IV? You may. I mean the bad ass smuggler guy, not the yoga instructor.) but becomes more willing eventually because The First Order is evil, which oddly was why he was unwilling in the beginning too.
- Bad guy with serious Force issues and really is as whiny as Vader... so yeah... too much Vader in him.
- Death of a significant character near the end. This film diverts a bit from it A New Hope because this death was fucking meaningless and stupid. It felt like that moment when pretty boy turns to the Dark Side and you think, that's fucking it?!? 'Yes Master, should I murder children now?'
- Main hero steps it up way too much, well past what their abilities should actually be. Our hero is a better Jedi than Yoda!
- Attack run on base to finally blow up the planet... which apparently happens much easier than you'd think.

What is frustrating is that elements in this film were there for a good pair of movies (start to the poofing of the first planet, then from the poofing to end of the attack). Instead of fleshing out two full and well explained plots, they smooshed together as much as they could squeeze in, in order to justify not having enough time to need to explain why anything happens in the film.

- Why stormtrooper just decides to give up?
- What the fuck is with this mommy stormtrooper (who also is easily captured and then just makes it easy to destroy the base)?
- How could that fragment of the galaxy be uncharted, yet the main character finds rather quickly?
- Another planet destroyer? Seriously?! I thought that was a joke by people.
- How did that woman get the lightsaber?
- How in the world did the piece of garbage Millennium Falcon work to start with and work the entire film?

I didn't watch the film in the theater because I thought the film wouldn't be worth it. A decent to watch movie, but nothing stellar. So I didn't have high hopes. What I didn't expect was a movie that was a remixed version of A New Hope, more so than the Into the Darkness Star Trek film was with Wrath of Khan. The one saving grace is that the Pretty Boy isn't in this film, and the acting at no real point, in the movie (other than Carrie Fisher) was bad. So the only thing making you (alright, a hypercritical me) roll the eyes is the transparent copied plot.

1.8 of 4 (0.2 star deduction for no Wedge Antilles, yes I know he said he didn't want to be in the film)
 
Star Wars VII - The Revenue Awakens (spoilers, but I was the last human to see it so that shouldn't be trouble)

That honor still belongs to me.

I haven't seen it and I'll only see it if it comes on Netflix or Hulu some day. When all that money can be spent, and when all they can come up with is to remake another movie and just slap a different name on it, then I won't go out of my way to see it.

The film industry is in a bad way these days. At any time in American filmmaking history has formula been so popular? They could have have great writers come in and do something special with this flick, but they didn't. The main criteria for hiring a writer these days does not involve the variety and depth of what they've done, but rather, how well they can adhere to things that have already done by previous unimaginative writers a million times over.

And I keep waiting for this fucking superhero horseshit to end, but they keep cranking them out, and people keep paying to see them. I remember when serious dramas with deep characters dealing with human issues used to be shown in trailers at the movie theaters. Now it's all Boom! Sccchwweeeew!Crash! eye candy while half the audience sits slack-jawed with drool dripping out the corners of their mouths.

And the comedy? All but dead. I remember when comedies were as consistent a staple as dramas.
 
Back
Top Bottom