untermensche
Contributor
Unfortunately the second you do things because "that's what Jesus would have wanted" is the second you drift into insanity.
I've read that it appears a good chunk of Trump support aren't typical voters, therefore a loss of Trump support doesn't necessarily equate a loss of Republican candidate support. The Republicans are a lot more worried about a Trump candidacy than dealing with any repercussions of him not being on the ticket.The problem is that the elitist Washington insiders who think that they run the party know that they can't afford to alienate the rather large segment of the party which supports Trump. Any chance that they have of winning the White House involves sqeaking past Clinton with slightly over 50% of the vote in a few key states. If they just diss him and rally against him at the convention despite him having a good deal of support, those people will stay home on election day and they lose anyways.
The race for the White House is almost assuredly lost at this point. They are trying to save the House and Senate at this point.I've read that it appears a good chunk of Trump support aren't typical voters, therefore a loss of Trump support doesn't necessarily equate a loss of Republican candidate support. The Republicans are a lot more worried about a Trump candidacy than dealing with any repercussions of him not being on the ticket.
But the GOP knows that these people are potential voters and they want them coming out to the ballot box. Right now, the early polling (granted, we're almost a year off with all that entails, but it does give a basic picture) has Clinton dominating both Cruz and Rubio in the electoral vote count. The GOP needs everything to break their way in order to get into the White House. If they trade off one thing for another thing, they lose. Full stop. It doesn't lower their chances of victory, it eliminates their chances of victory.
The code speech is all that works and even code speech is "selling out" according to the Trump base.They need to both court the Trump voters and not turn anyone off by their courting of the Trump voters. They don't know how to thread that needle because it's kind of a needle which can't be threaded but they are not, at this point, willing to concede the White House in order to try and shore up the Senate and Congress and Governors and the like. That means that they need that 20-30% of the base to remain motivated enough in their support to bother with them, but keep them motivated in a way that ... nobody outside of that group notices? I have no clue what a potential plan would be, but they seem to be trying to find one. If they don't find one, it's done.
The race for the White House is almost assuredly lost at this point. They are trying to save the House and Senate at this point.But the GOP knows that these people are potential voters and they want them coming out to the ballot box. Right now, the early polling (granted, we're almost a year off with all that entails, but it does give a basic picture) has Clinton dominating both Cruz and Rubio in the electoral vote count. The GOP needs everything to break their way in order to get into the White House. If they trade off one thing for another thing, they lose. Full stop. It doesn't lower their chances of victory, it eliminates their chances of victory.
Jesus, don't you tell me about the crucifixion. I was at the crucifixion! I ran it. It wasn't a big deal. Most overstated event in history, ever!I think Jesus vs. Trump could be comedy gold material in the right hands. Showing my age here, but imagine what Monty Python could do with this, Michael Palin as Jesus and John Cleese as Trump
fG
Cruz is starting to absorb the evangelical Carson supporters into his gelatinous matrix. So his polling will likely go up in a state like South Carolina.
- - - Updated - - -
Jesus, don't you tell me about the crucifixion. I was at the crucifixion! I ran it. It wasn't a big deal. Most overstated event in history, ever!I think Jesus vs. Trump could be comedy gold material in the right hands. Showing my age here, but imagine what Monty Python could do with this, Michael Palin as Jesus and John Cleese as Trump
fG
*applause*
We'll likely see a ticket along those lines that has both Trumb and some GOP not-so-Trumb to balance things out. Something like that could actually take the White House. Don't know if the GOP is that savvy. Maybe they're just not desperate enough yet. Who gets P and VP is not yet decided.I think Jesus vs. Trump could be comedy gold material in the right hands. Showing my age here, but imagine what Monty Python could do with this, Michael Palin as Jesus and John Cleese as Trump
fG
We'll likely see a ticket along those lines that has both Trumb and some GOP not-so-Trumb to balance things out. Something like that could actually take the White House. Don't know if the GOP is that savvy. Maybe they're just not desperate enough yet. Who gets P and VP is not yet decided.I think Jesus vs. Trump could be comedy gold material in the right hands. Showing my age here, but imagine what Monty Python could do with this, Michael Palin as Jesus and John Cleese as Trump
fG
I'll give you that neither Trump or any other GOP candidate is that bright. But we're selling comic books here and you've just got to write one that just-as-dumb voters will purchase. This isn't rocket science. The only chance the GOP has is to combine all elements of their party if they're going to take the white house.We'll likely see a ticket along those lines that has both Trumb and some GOP not-so-Trumb to balance things out. Something like that could actually take the White House. Don't know if the GOP is that savvy. Maybe they're just not desperate enough yet. Who gets P and VP is not yet decided.
No, something like that could not win the White House. The main reason is that Trump isn't going to be second banana to anyone, so he's either the Presidential candidate or not involved - the man isn't taking a VP spot. Even if I'm wrong about that and he does, he'd spend all his time undercutting whatever message the Presidential candidate is talking about due to Trump's utter lack of giving the first shit about what the Presidential candidate would be talking about and would derail the entire campaign and every Presidential candidate is well aware of this. Given that a President Trump isn't electable, there isn't a situation where a ticket with him on it would get into the White House.
I'll give you that neither Trump or any other GOP candidate is that bright. But we're selling comic books here and you've just got to write one that just-as-dumb voters will purchase. This isn't rocket science. The only chance the GOP has is to combine all elements of their party if they're going to take the white house.
Well, if you are in love with the 'latest poll', another latest poll has Trump only up by 8 points in South Carolina.Why does anyone think Cruz is going to win in South Carolina? Shheeeesh! Latest poll has Trump up 20 points there. South Carolinian Republicans are extremely racist. I don't think they'd ever vote for anyone named Cruz. And given it's a winner take all, it may be the catalyst which makes Trump's victory inevitable.
Nice little fantasy stringed up there...If Trump loses in Iowa, but wins in both New Hampshire (where he also has a large lead) and then South Carolina, the momentum may be too great to resist him. And he could easily win Iowa as well. CNN has him 13 points ahead there now. If he wins all three, I don't see how he is stopped.
Sure, this isn't a complete rerun of 2012. However, we can learn from history that people are not that honest (or just say shit to them) with pollsters. History does show that polls at this stage really haven't been shown to be very predictive when there isn't an obvious front runner of significance (and even then it sometimes doesn't work). We do see from a long historical record for both parties that outsiders (aka those with no significant political or military background) don't win major party primaries. All this suggests that Trump is still little more than bread and circus. It doesn't rule out him causing the Repugs a problem or such, but little strongly suggests that he will threaten the powers that be in the end...This isn't 2012, where we saw a succession of Republican front runners coming and going in the several months leading up to the primaries. All the pundits say Trump's lead can't last. But it has. No matter what he says. And he's actually getting stronger. History simply does not repeat itself. It's just a myth. I'll stick my neck out and say he's going to be the nominee and the establishment is going to have to eat it. The only way he loses is if the other candidates bow out in favor of Cruz or someone (and Cruz isn't any better).
I'll give you that neither Trump or any other GOP candidate is that bright. But we're selling comic books here and you've just got to write one that just-as-dumb voters will purchase. This isn't rocket science. The only chance the GOP has is to combine all elements of their party if they're going to take the white house.No, something like that could not win the White House. The main reason is that Trump isn't going to be second banana to anyone, so he's either the Presidential candidate or not involved - the man isn't taking a VP spot. Even if I'm wrong about that and he does, he'd spend all his time undercutting whatever message the Presidential candidate is talking about due to Trump's utter lack of giving the first shit about what the Presidential candidate would be talking about and would derail the entire campaign and every Presidential candidate is well aware of this. Given that a President Trump isn't electable, there isn't a situation where a ticket with him on it would get into the White House.
Well, if you are in love with the 'latest poll', another latest poll has Trump only up by 8 points in South Carolina.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/gop_pres_primary/
Nice little fantasy stringed up there...If Trump loses in Iowa, but wins in both New Hampshire (where he also has a large lead) and then South Carolina, the momentum may be too great to resist him. And he could easily win Iowa as well. CNN has him 13 points ahead there now. If he wins all three, I don't see how he is stopped.
Sure, this isn't a complete rerun of 2012. However, we can learn from history that people are not that honest (or just say shit to them) with pollsters. History does show that polls at this stage really haven't been shown to be very predictive when there isn't an obvious front runner of significance (and even then it sometimes doesn't work). We do see from a long historical record for both parties that outsiders (aka those with no significant political or military background) don't win major party primaries. All this suggests that Trump is still little more than bread and circus. It doesn't rule out him causing the Repugs a problem or such, but little strongly suggests that he will threaten the powers that be in the end...This isn't 2012, where we saw a succession of Republican front runners coming and going in the several months leading up to the primaries. All the pundits say Trump's lead can't last. But it has. No matter what he says. And he's actually getting stronger. History simply does not repeat itself. It's just a myth. I'll stick my neck out and say he's going to be the nominee and the establishment is going to have to eat it. The only way he loses is if the other candidates bow out in favor of Cruz or someone (and Cruz isn't any better).
Ya, that's Crazily Excited Woman #42. She's at all the political rallies which are worth being at.
I thought she was photoshopped in from another photo. Is she looking behind Trump?
Like there is something behind the Donald she is afraid of...
I think you have a point up to the point that one reason why Trump is winning is because there is no Romney or McCain in the race. There was Jeb, but he appears to be down for the count. Usually there is one guy that can weather a Trump like candidate. I don't think we've seen something like this since Wallace.Sure, this isn't a complete rerun of 2012. However, we can learn from history that people are not that honest (or just say shit to them) with pollsters. History does show that polls at this stage really haven't been shown to be very predictive when there isn't an obvious front runner of significance (and even then it sometimes doesn't work). We do see from a long historical record for both parties that outsiders (aka those with no significant political or military background) don't win major party primaries. All this suggests that Trump is still little more than bread and circus. It doesn't rule out him causing the Repugs a problem or such, but little strongly suggests that he will threaten the powers that be in the end...This isn't 2012, where we saw a succession of Republican front runners coming and going in the several months leading up to the primaries. All the pundits say Trump's lead can't last. But it has. No matter what he says. And he's actually getting stronger. History simply does not repeat itself. It's just a myth. I'll stick my neck out and say he's going to be the nominee and the establishment is going to have to eat it. The only way he loses is if the other candidates bow out in favor of Cruz or someone (and Cruz isn't any better).