Chris will ultimately cause more kids to castrate themselves and regret it.
As far as I know he's not indoctrinating children (but he says the trans supporters are
in schools) - except for his own. He says that children are beautiful as they are. I'd don't see how that would provoke children to castrate themselves.
It's not about "indoctrination". The issue here is "unforseen consequences of his actions".
It doesn't matter what he says, and the reality is that no matter how beautiful others say you are, that doesn't mean a lick of spit to what some people's brains are configured for.
It's not about being beautiful. It would have been NICE to have become what I could have, to have had the voice I could have and so on.
Those are nice things to have.
I'm talking about things that fuck a person up over time unless they have it.
Did you not read my very first posts to Lauren's gender thread?
Did you not watch Robert Sapolski explain the neuroscience of it?
There is more to it than just how someone looks.
I have a constant low-level headache that makes me utterly detest my life when I have testosterone active in my body.
It is a set of invasive thoughts that honestly, I hate. I have a husband, a stable relationship, at least some hope of consistent income over the next few years though this political climate is making that very hard, and I can recognize that for what it is. It's happening right now because I'm out of pills and shitlords like Chris are making it very hard to get appointments and find offices or even feel safe seeking care.
And it might take me a whole additional year of pills before I can get a surgical appointment. I've actually been delaying care on my hernia repair repair, hoping I can get the thing done then and not have the remaining risk of testicular cancer and have my inguinal canals fully secured?
I personally think someone should have to have to remain on blockers until they are 18 or have been on them for more than 3 years, whichever comes later, or 1 year over the age of 25 with a 1 month break, before they can get their balls off? It seems pretty reasonable to me.
It means that someone has to be really serious and actually like the effects.
I can see how some people would really dislike the effects, depending on how much they enjoy being under the influence of testosterone.
I do not believe he has any moral right, nor do you, in their fertility.
If they don't like the effects, testosterone treatments are available. They're stunningly cheap, widely available, and easy to take.
They are still available for "low T" boys all over who don't like being like me, or fear it while not understanding it.
As I understand it, though, the chemical I take doesn't impact fertility, really; testosterone is the byproduct of sperm production and the chemical I take, spironolactone, blocks onward uptake of testosterone, after it was made.
Instead of "blocking the ink to the scribes of sperm and testosterone", it is "snatching the letter of testosterone only, before it reaches the offices of the brain, leaving the letter of sperm in unmolested".
I personally find that a raw deal because it doesn't make for effective birth control.
The problem is that Chris is full of hate and doesn't know or care what he is talking about.
