Nice Squirrel
Contributor
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2004
- Messages
- 6,083
- Location
- Minnesota
- Basic Beliefs
- Only the Nice Squirrel can save us.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Then why don't the Christophobic bigots ever target a Muslim business?
Well, you kind of answer your own question, there. If the upset over Mrs. Davis is BECAUSE SHE'S CHRISTAIN, then a true Christophibic Bigot would not be concerned with muslims, would they? Unless they were ALSO Islamophobic. But that's two different conditions.Then why don't the Christophobic bigots ever target a Muslim business?
...he said on the internet, using an alias.It's fascinating to watch the lefties mock and ibsult Christians and ignore the Muslims. Cowards.
Yep.
Then why don't the Christophobic bigots ever target a Muslim business?
If a Muslim refused to bake a queer marriage cake would they be "religious bigot" too?
It's the religious martyrdom complex.If a Muslim refused to bake a queer marriage cake would they be "religious bigot" too?
Of course. Was there a question about this?
Then why don't the Christophobic bigots ever target a Muslim business?
It's fascinating to watch the lefties mock and ibsult Christians and ignore the Muslims. Cowards.
Well, you kind of answer your own question, there. If the upset over Mrs. Davis is BECAUSE SHE'S CHRISTAIN, then a true Christophibic Bigot would not be concerned with muslims, would they? Unless they were ALSO Islamophobic. But that's two different conditions.
Your question is more like asking if a diabetic should be against tobacco laws based on their diabetes. It's a completely different issue.
And really, that's an odd question in a thread about someone pursuing their religion over the government office she's sworn to fulfill. It's not a business that she's operating.
And odd that you think asking someone elected to an office to perform the job she swore to uphold is bullying. How does that work? Are we not allowing her to quit if the burden of doing her fucking job is too onerous? Are we making sure that all her taxpayer salary dollars have 'in god we trust' crossed out? Did she not get the memo that her job included licenses to people who might not agree with her religion's stances on, for example, adultery, divorce, abortion, miscegenation, and so on?
Where does she draw the line?
Or more importantly, where does the state draw the line on how much leverage she has to decide what her job actually entails?
- - - Updated - - -
...he said on the internet, using an alias.It's fascinating to watch the lefties mock and ibsult Christians and ignore the Muslims. Cowards.
Yes, but i'm not using my internet anonymity to call other people cowards you brave, brave soldier for Christ.Yes, same as you are using an alias.
Sure we do.The Christophobic bigots love to go on and on and on justifying their own bigotry.
Yes, but i'm not using my internet anonymity to call other people cowards you brave, brave soldier for Christ.
Sure we do.The Christophobic bigots love to go on and on and on justifying their own bigotry.
And brevity is the soul of openmindedness, i suppose?
Yes, but i'm not using my internet anonymity to call other people cowards you brave, brave soldier for Christ.
Sure we do.
And brevity is the soul of openmindedness, i suppose?
The left are cowards. They bully Christians and appease and ignore the hateful murderous backwards tribal cult called Islam. C'mon hypocrite, bring it.
Well, at least you specify individuals you have an issue with, not just blind, shotgun bigotry.The left are cowards.
What does 'islam' have to do with trying to get Kim to do the job she asked to do and was elected to do?They bully Christians and appease and ignore the hateful murderous backwards tribal cult called Islam. C'mon hypocrite, bring it.
Yes, but i'm not using my internet anonymity to call other people cowards you brave, brave soldier for Christ.
Sure we do.
And brevity is the soul of openmindedness, i suppose?
The left are cowards. They bully Christians and appease and ignore the hateful murderous backwards tribal cult called Islam. C'mon hypocrite, bring it.
I never let myself forget that the Quakers and the Mennonites were opposed to slavery from the very earliest days of colonization. They were the "far left wing" of their time, and other Christians HATED them for it.The left are cowards. They bully Christians and appease and ignore the hateful murderous backwards tribal cult called Islam. C'mon hypocrite, bring it.
Please don't challenge other forum members to a duel. It adds nothing to the discussion, whether you could or could not kick someone's ass.
For most of recent US history, Christians have been the left. It was Christians that spearheaded the civil rights movement, something virulently opposed by the right. Civil rights workers walked into situations where they knew right wing political activists were going to beat them. There really is no room for the word "coward" when describing the left, then or today.
There is no cowardice in standing up to long lived religious authority and saying, you are violating the law of this nation.
The left are cowards. They bully Christians and appease and ignore the hateful murderous backwards tribal cult called Islam. C'mon hypocrite, bring it.
1) I don't actually give a shit about Islam since Muslims in America are overwhelmingly peaceful and a very small minority in my community. They keep to themselves and pay taxes like everyone else; no problems. For that matter I have no hostility towards MOST Christians either, in fact I harbor a special fondness towards certain flavors of the faith (Jehovas Witnesses and Quakers in particular) because I respect their principles and their having the balls to actually live by them. There are SPECIFIC sects of Christianity, however, that provide a safe haven for meddlesome, self-righteous agitators driven by little else but moral panic. I have no tolerance whatsoever for such people.
2) Telling an asshole to stop being an asshole is no more "bullying" than taking the keys from a drunk driver. Certain types of Christians call it "bullying" when they're prevented from slut-shaming teenage girls or disparaging homosexuals in junior high schools. If standing in judgement of other people's sex lives is a religious sacrament, you're welcome to do that in your church or in the privacy of your own home. If you choose to do so in the public sphere, then you should be prepared to deal with the consequences of that choice, up to and including public alienation when everyone points out what an asshole you are.
I never let myself forget that the Quakers and the Mennonites were opposed to slavery from the very earliest days of colonization. They were the "far left wing" of their time, and other Christians HATED them for it.Please don't challenge other forum members to a duel. It adds nothing to the discussion, whether you could or could not kick someone's ass.
For most of recent US history, Christians have been the left. It was Christians that spearheaded the civil rights movement, something virulently opposed by the right. Civil rights workers walked into situations where they knew right wing political activists were going to beat them. There really is no room for the word "coward" when describing the left, then or today.
There is no cowardice in standing up to long lived religious authority and saying, you are violating the law of this nation.
The underground railroad was run by Christians.
Yes, but i'm not using my internet anonymity to call other people cowards you brave, brave soldier for Christ.
Sure we do.
And brevity is the soul of openmindedness, i suppose?
The left are cowards. They bully Christians and appease and ignore the hateful murderous backwards tribal cult called Islam. C'mon hypocrite, bring it.