• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Democrats 2020

Dear god, the man is a walking disaster. We're screwed. He always does this, torpedoes his campaigns with some dumbass gaffe, and then makes things worse with his response.

We are going to be saddled with a fascist dictator because "moderate Democrats" were more comfortable electing a senile centrist than a charismatic candidate who says "socialism" sometimes.
 
Dear god, the man is a walking disaster. We're screwed. He always does this, torpedoes his campaigns with some dumbass gaffe, and then makes things worse with his response.

We are going to be saddled with a fascist dictator because "moderate Democrats" were more comfortable electing a senile centrist than a charismatic candidate who says "socialism" sometimes.

See, this is why Dems can’t have nice things. Biden has said stupid shit for years and we all knew this going in. But still, still we will, us, not Biden, will take that gun he is pointing at his foot and aim it at our heads. Meanwhile, the Republicans will brush away, well, all of who Trump is. I mean, the guy’s the poster child for negative character traits. Try to find one you can’t hang on him. It’s a damn short list.
But hey, not our candidate. Our candidate will be as correct as an Oberlin College lunch menu or nothing.
And “charismatic”? Who are you talking about? To be classed as charismatic, one would need to win more people over from one election cycle to the next not lose them. Isn’t that suppose to be the happy outcome of possessing charisma? Or did it autocorrect “cantankerous”?
 
Dear god, the man is a walking disaster. We're screwed. He always does this, torpedoes his campaigns with some dumbass gaffe, and then makes things worse with his response.

We are going to be saddled with a fascist dictator because "moderate Democrats" were more comfortable electing a senile centrist than a charismatic candidate who says "socialism" sometimes.

See, this is why Dems can’t have nice things. Biden has said stupid shit for years and we all knew this going in. But still, still we will, us, not Biden, will take that gun he is pointing at his foot and aim it at our heads. Meanwhile, the Republicans will brush away, well, all of who Trump is. I mean, the guy’s the poster child for negative character traits. Try to find one you can’t hang on him. It’s a damn short list.
But hey, not our candidate. Our candidate will be as correct as an Oberlin College lunch menu or nothing.
And “charismatic”? Who are you talking about? To be classed as charismatic, one would need to win more people over from one election cycle to the next not lose them. Isn’t that suppose to be the happy outcome of possessing charisma? Or did it autocorrect “cantankerous”?

I mean, that's a pretty dumb criteria. Obama, who is anything if not charismatic, won less people from 2008 to 2012. And comparing Sander's raw numbers when he was in a 2 person race compared to the clown car of the current primary isn't exactly a good way to determine charisma.


But I actually agree with you, I don't think Sanders was particularly charismatic. I think the issues he championed were popular.
 
No wonder Creepy is kept hidden away in his basement. But he can't stay there forever. Like Dracula he has to emerge from his coffin sooner or later.

 
I tell you what. You show me a " Greenie" who's not a leftists, and I'll show you nude pics of Salma Hyak. :p

Newt Gingrich
Teddy Roosevelt
Richard Nixon

I'll see those photos now please.

Sorry. But none of those gentlemen could be labeled anywhere near being a Green. Or as members of a loony tunes Green party!

Yeah, Teddy hated the outdoors. Or, how would you define Green in 1901? I don't read many of your comments but of the ones I have, this is the wrongest one yet.
 
Sorry. But none of those gentlemen could be labeled anywhere near being a Green. Or as members of a loony tunes Green party!

Yeah, Teddy hated the outdoors. Or, how would you define Green in 1901? I don't read many of your comments but of the ones I have, this is the wrongest one yet.

Yep, and it was Nixon who created the EPA, and it is pretty clear angelo didn't read the link of Gingrich praising the merits of Green Conservatism.
 
Dear god, the man is a walking disaster. We're screwed. He always does this, torpedoes his campaigns with some dumbass gaffe, and then makes things worse with his response.

We are going to be saddled with a fascist dictator because "moderate Democrats" were more comfortable electing a senile centrist than a charismatic candidate who says "socialism" sometimes.

See, this is why Dems can’t have nice things. Biden has said stupid shit for years and we all knew this going in. But still, still we will, us, not Biden, will take that gun he is pointing at his foot and aim it at our heads. Meanwhile, the Republicans will brush away, well, all of who Trump is. I mean, the guy’s the poster child for negative character traits. Try to find one you can’t hang on him. It’s a damn short list.
But hey, not our candidate. Our candidate will be as correct as an Oberlin College lunch menu or nothing.
And “charismatic”? Who are you talking about? To be classed as charismatic, one would need to win more people over from one election cycle to the next not lose them. Isn’t that suppose to be the happy outcome of possessing charisma? Or did it autocorrect “cantankerous”?

I mean, that's a pretty dumb criteria. Obama, who is anything if not charismatic, won less people from 2008 to 2012. And comparing Sander's raw numbers when he was in a 2 person race compared to the clown car of the current primary isn't exactly a good way to determine charisma.


But I actually agree with you, I don't think Sanders was particularly charismatic. I think the issues he championed were popular.

I think your comparison is less than fair. In '12, Obama was like the hot chick we already bagged, if I may be so crude, so it could be expected to see his numbers drop. Bernie's championed issues were dreams we had yet to realize so the attraction should have carried to the next election cycle.
 
Sorry. But none of those gentlemen could be labeled anywhere near being a Green. Or as members of a loony tunes Green party!

Yeah, Teddy hated the outdoors. Or, how would you define Green in 1901? I don't read many of your comments but of the ones I have, this is the wrongest one yet.

Yep, and it was Nixon who created the EPA, and it is pretty clear angelo didn't read the link of Gingrich praising the merits of Green Conservatism.

You're still holding the line that the gentlemen you mentioned were greens? Are you crazy, or just pretending to be? Having an environment policy does not make one a greenie!
 
Yep, and it was Nixon who created the EPA, and it is pretty clear angelo didn't read the link of Gingrich praising the merits of Green Conservatism.

You're still holding the line that the gentlemen you mentioned were greens? Are you crazy, or just pretending to be? Having an environment policy does not make one a greenie!
I realize that you are simply fixated within your itty bitty world of hate for everything not alt-right, but you are carping on just 3 words 'moderate green libertarian', while knowing next to nothing of my views. I am not a Green or a greenie (especially as you would define it). Those 3 words are just a sliver of a window's view into my views. Maybe you should try to comprehend another's POV before hurling your favorite play thing...monkey shit.

Anyway, my point still stands, why would anyone pay any attention to your twisted commentary when you label Biden as a pedophile, while licking Clownstick's ass...
 
Joe Biden tells Charlamagne tha God 'you ain't black' if you vote for Trump over him

EYolbNxXsAYpQPV


EYo_iEcUEAAuBNd


Is the conspiracy for the 2020 election gonna be that Trump conspired with Corn Pop to make Biden the Dem nominee?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
:deadpan:
:deadpan:
:biggrin-new: :biggrin-new: :biggrin-new: :biggrin-new: :biggrin-new: :biggrin-new: :biggrin-new:
 
Ugh - I cringed when I read Biden’s comment about “you’re not a black person if...”

Height of privilege. At least he has the self awareness to accept the feedback that it was offensive, though that’s a small consolation.


However, if given a choice between his careless privilege, and Trump’s malignant hate, I still know which I prefer.
 
Yep, and it was Nixon who created the EPA, and it is pretty clear angelo didn't read the link of Gingrich praising the merits of Green Conservatism.

You're still holding the line that the gentlemen you mentioned were greens? Are you crazy, or just pretending to be? Having an environment policy does not make one a greenie!
I realize that you are simply fixated within your itty bitty world of hate for everything not alt-right, but you are carping on just 3 words 'moderate green libertarian', while knowing next to nothing of my views. I am not a Green or a greenie (especially as you would define it). Those 3 words are just a sliver of a window's view into my views. Maybe you should try to comprehend another's POV before hurling your favorite play thing...monkey shit.

Anyway, my point still stands, why would anyone pay any attention to your twisted commentary when you label Biden as a pedophile, while licking Clownstick's ass...

Simpletons don't "get" people with complex or nuanced views.
 
Ugh - I cringed when I read Biden’s comment about “you’re not a black person if...”

Height of privilege. At least he has the self awareness to accept the feedback that it was offensive, though that’s a small consolation.


However, if given a choice between his careless privilege, and Trump’s malignant hate, I still know which I prefer.

The worst part is that while he said it in a way that will most certainly damage his chances, the thing he was trying to communicate, poorly, is true: a black person voting for Trump is like a Jew voting for Hitler; it is a direct violation of self-interest and an insult to the culture and community from which the person so doing came from.
 
However, if given a choice between his careless privilege, and Trump’s malignant hate, I still know which I prefer.

Well, of course I still hope Biden will be elected. I just think he won't be. "Appealing to Blacks" is so far the only supporting argument I've heard applied to the man besides "not Trump" and "is a Democrat", neither of which are specific to him alone.
 
Ugh - I cringed when I read Biden’s comment about “you’re not a black person if...”

Height of privilege. At least he has the self awareness to accept the feedback that it was offensive, though that’s a small consolation.


However, if given a choice between his careless privilege, and Trump’s malignant hate, I still know which I prefer.

The worst part is that while he said it in a way that will most certainly damage his chances, the thing he was trying to communicate, poorly, is true: a black person voting for Trump is like a Jew voting for Hitler; it is a direct violation of self-interest and an insult to the culture and community from which the person so doing came from.
If you're not an upper or middle class white guy, voting for anyone in the American political system is usually a direct violation of self-interest. Ultimately, you will not be who they work for.
 
Dear god, the man is a walking disaster. We're screwed. He always does this, torpedoes his campaigns with some dumbass gaffe, and then makes things worse with his response.

We are going to be saddled with a fascist dictator because "moderate Democrats" were more comfortable electing a senile centrist than a charismatic candidate who says "socialism" sometimes.

Not to pick on Politesse, but this is a big difference between republicans and democrats. Biden made a mistake. He apologized. Holy shit. Trump says something outrageous every fucking day! And most of the time he's offending his own voters - and they look past it. I never thought that he'd get past mocking John McCain, and he did. Republicans rally around their guy, no matter what. He mocks women and says the most outrageous things about them that I've ever seen. And yet women vote for him. He's said outrageous things about Mexicans - a lot of them vote for him.

Biden is not a perfect politician. We should hold him to a high degree. But we've got to come together to beat Trump.
 
However, if given a choice between his careless privilege, and Trump’s malignant hate, I still know which I prefer.

Well, of course I still hope Biden will be elected. I just think he won't be. "Appealing to Blacks" is so far the only supporting argument I've heard applied to the man besides "not Trump" and "is a Democrat", neither of which are specific to him alone.
They are if he's the only other name on the ballot....
 
Back
Top Bottom