• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Breakdown In Civil Order

Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
How was America incentivizing crime in the early 80s?
 
There is strong evidence that exposure to tetraethyl lead, Pb(C2H5)4, caused a crime wave half a century ago. TEL was used as a gasoline additive to suppress "knocking", premature ignition. But it caused a lot of brain damage in a lot of people, and as a result, a lot of criminality.
There is also  Legalized abortion and crime effect - "Proponents argue that the availability of abortion resulted in fewer births of children at the highest risk of committing crime. " - but it overlaps with the lead-crime effect, because abortion was made less restricted in many places around when TEL was outlawed.
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
That is part of it.

The Dirty Harry movies were a response to people's concerns about crime in the day.

But there is also cultural change.
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
That is part of it.

The Dirty Harry movies were a response to people's concerns about crime in the day.

But there is also cultural change.
And the easy availability of handguns. Where do four teens all get guns?
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
That is part of it.

The Dirty Harry movies were a response to people's concerns about crime in the day.

But there is also cultural change.
And the easy availability of handguns. Where do four teens all get guns?
Their parents. Or one of their parents who has an arsenal.

The vast majority of guns used for crime are manufactured, shipped, and originally sold legally in a gun store to someone who is going to sell it or otherwise slip it out to criminal use
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Why do you imagine that the plural of "anecdote" is "data"?

TWOC-ing was one of the go-to entertainments for bored teenagers in my home town in the UK in the 1980s and '90s. It's not new, and as far as I can determine, it's not growing in frequency.

What has changed is the widespread adoption of immobiliser technology by car makers, so that stealing a car now requires you to steal the keys - which makes an interaction with the owner more likely, and therefore increases the probability of violence or the threat of violence.
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Why do you imagine that the plural of "anecdote" is "data"?

TWOC-ing was one of the go-to entertainments for bored teenagers in my home town in the UK in the 1980s and '90s. It's not new, and as far as I can determine, it's not growing in frequency.

What has changed is the widespread adoption of immobiliser technology by car makers, so that stealing a car now requires you to steal the keys - which makes an interaction with the owner more likely, and therefore increases the probability of violence or the threat of violence.
You make it sound like the increase in violence or the threat, is the fault of the car makers.
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Why do you imagine that the plural of "anecdote" is "data"?

TWOC-ing was one of the go-to entertainments for bored teenagers in my home town in the UK in the 1980s and '90s. It's not new, and as far as I can determine, it's not growing in frequency.

What has changed is the widespread adoption of immobiliser technology by car makers, so that stealing a car now requires you to steal the keys - which makes an interaction with the owner more likely, and therefore increases the probability of violence or the threat of violence.
You make it sound like the increase in violence or the threat, is the fault of the car makers.
It is.

Defending against crime often has unintended consequences.

Criminals adapt to the measures taken to stop them, and will typically choose to avoid confrontation or violence where possible.

When you make it harder to commit crime without confrontation or violence, confrontation and violence will increase.

That doesn't mean you shouldn't do it, but it does mean you have no right to be surprised by increasing violence when you do, nor to assume that it's a sign of some kind of widespread moral collapse or breakdown of society.

Criminals target the weakest part of any system. If you harden the mechanical elements, you make it more likely that the human elements will be seen as the softest target.

People used to break into bank vaults by smashing cutting or digging their way in. Banks responded by making the vaults stronger, so criminals learned to unlock them. The locks were improved, and the robbers moved on to using explosives. The vaults were made blast-proof, and criminals started robbing banks at gunpoint. Vaults were equipped with time locks, so criminals started taking bank workers families hostage.

It's an arms race; And the human element is the hardest to protect, so ultimately it becomes the main target for criminals.

I don't know what the answer is, but I am damn sure it's not to pretend that the problem isn't real.

Criminals are lazy. Psychopathic criminals are very rare; Mostly they are only violent when it's the easiest remaining option that achieves their objective.
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
How was America incentivizing crime in the early 80s?
Increasing incarceration rates were not the disincentive conservatives and right-wingers claim them to be.

Incarceration-Violent-crime-rates-per100-000-in-the-USA-1960-2020.png
 
There is strong evidence that exposure to tetraethyl lead, Pb(C2H5)4, caused a crime wave half a century ago. TEL was used as a gasoline additive to suppress "knocking", premature ignition. But it caused a lot of brain damage in a lot of people, and as a result, a lot of criminality.
There is also  Legalized abortion and crime effect - "Proponents argue that the availability of abortion resulted in fewer births of children at the highest risk of committing crime. " - but it overlaps with the lead-crime effect, because abortion was made less restricted in many places around when TEL was outlawed.
Was just looking around Reddit today and saw this.

It is additional separately reflected support of the tetraethyl lead theory of criminal ideation and brain damage.

A study on crime in that same cohort would also be interesting.
 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
How was America incentivizing crime in the early 80s?
Increasing incarceration rates were not the disincentive conservatives and right-wingers claim them to be.

Incarceration-Violent-crime-rates-per100-000-in-the-USA-1960-2020.png
As James Q. Wilson noted, imprisoning dangerous criminals might not rehabilitate them or even deter them, but done rigorously it incapacitated them. And that graph shows that as policy shifted from the 60s liberal approach to the lock’em up 90s, incapacitation caught up with violent crime rates. But, yes, I’d agree that there is no disincentive for a psychopath to stop committing violent crime. So for the public’s sake, put them away.
 
the lock’em up 90s, incapacitation caught up with violent crime rates.
No, this does not in any way account for the changes in crime rate.

Research on the subject shows a nearly perfect correlation to either lead levels or abortion rates, and additional corroboration implicates lead over abortion. At least for gainful prospects of employment.

Even so, these may have been cofactors.

The "tough on crime" approach didn't actually help anything, and led to a lot of people getting further damaged by our broken "corrections" program, which is both costly and inhumane.
 
the lock’em up 90s, incapacitation caught up with violent crime rates.
No, this does not in any way account for the changes in crime rate.

Research on the subject shows a nearly perfect correlation to either lead levels or abortion rates, and additional corroboration implicates lead over abortion. At least for gainful prospects of employment.

Even so, these may have been cofactors.

The "tough on crime" approach didn't actually help anything, and led to a lot of people getting further damaged by our broken "corrections" program, which is both costly and inhumane.
The abortion argument is unpersuasive as violent crime was highest in the early 90s among young men; a cohort born after Roe. Not so sure about lead, as though it may make you dumb, does it make you violent? But one thing for sure is that violent criminals, if allowed to go free, won’t stop being violent.

 
If the state won't protect the people, the people will do it themselves.



 
Yesterday in Seattle 3 teens two boys one girl all armed followed a woman home and stole her car at gunpoint. The police got them after a chase and a crash.

This is not isolated. Why are teens today across demogrphics commiting these kinds of crimes?
Because they know their age will spare them from significant punishment. If we incentivize bad behavior, we get more of it. Shocking.
How was America incentivizing crime in the early 80s?
Increasing incarceration rates were not the disincentive conservatives and right-wingers claim them to be.

Incarceration-Violent-crime-rates-per100-000-in-the-USA-1960-2020.png
...that graph shows that as policy shifted from the 60s liberal approach to the lock’em up 90s, incapacitation caught up with violent crime rates.
The graph shows the following:
  • The period from 1960 to 1972 saw next to no change in the incarceration rate, but the violent crime rate increased noticeably.
  • The "lock’em up" approach to incarceration did not start in the '90s. It began in 1973. By 1992 it had more than doubled. In the same time period the violent crime rate increased by 42%.
  • Between 2009 and 2014 the incarceration rate dropped - along with the violent crime rate.
Only 15 of the 54 years of data represented by the graph coincide with and actual drop in violent crime and a concomitant increase in incarceration. There is no consistent correlation between incarceration and violent crime rates needed to demonstrate that one is a function of the other. What you have done is an egregious example of cherry picking. Stop it.
But, yes, I’d agree that there is no disincentive for a psychopath to stop committing violent crime. So for the public’s sake, put them away.
What percentage of violent crimes is committed by psychopaths?
 
What percentage of violent crimes is committed by psychopaths?
Is this a joke? The highest rate of recidivism is for violent offenders.



Please. For the sake of public safety, stop coddling these monsters.

 
What percentage of violent crimes is committed by psychopaths?
Is this a joke? The highest rate of recidivism is for violent offenders.
Please show the rate of recidivism for violent offenders answers the question about the percentage of violent crimes committed by psychopaths.
He won't answer the question. So I quote from Oleg's citation,

And of the approximately 6,720,000 adult males that are in prison, jail, parole, or probation,3 16%, or 1,075,000, are psychopaths.

The same study also states

This review also highlights a recent, compelling and cost-effective treatment program that has shown a significant reduction in violent recidivism in youth on a putative trajectory to psychopathic personality

Which appears to contradict Oleg's position.
 
What percentage of violent crimes is committed by psychopaths?
Is this a joke? The highest rate of recidivism is for violent offenders.
Please show the rate of recidivism for violent offenders answers the question about the percentage of violent crimes committed by psychopaths.
He won't answer the question. So I quote from Oleg's citation,

And of the approximately 6,720,000 adult males that are in prison, jail, parole, or probation,3 16%, or 1,075,000, are psychopaths.

The same study also states

This review also highlights a recent, compelling and cost-effective treatment program that has shown a significant reduction in violent recidivism in youth on a putative trajectory to psychopathic personality

Which appears to contradict Oleg's position.
Oleg cannot answer my question because it is unverifiable what percentage of crimes are committed by any demographic. We would need to know all the crimes (including those that are unreported) as well as who committed them along with their demographic information and psychological profile. That data is unavailable.
 
Back
Top Bottom