Anecdotal cases aren't meaningful.
Is that true for everybody's anecdotes or only my anecdotes? I don't think what you're saying here is true at all because anecdotes can be very helpful in substantiating and clarifying concepts.
There will always be people who murder their loved ones, either out of hate or sometimes out of compassion. That doesn't make them legal or related to the issue we are discussing.
I don't think that claiming compassion as a motive for murder would hold up in most courts although it seems very popular on this thread.
Btw, there was a case in my own small city well over 10 years ago...
Wait a minute--didn't you just get done saying that "anecdotal cases aren't meaningful"? I suppose I have the answer to my question: Only my anecdotes aren't meaningful.
...where a mother murdered her two sons who were victims of the horrible disease known as Huntingtons Disease. If you're not familiar with it, it's usually genetic, and it leaves the individual with uncontrollable shaking, some cognitive decline and eventually totall dependence. Her two adult sons had been in a nursing home for a few years, after becoming totally dependent, and she walked in one day, and shot both of them because she didn't want to see them suffer any longer. She was given a five year prison sentence, partly due to the fact that what she did, while illegal, was an act of compassion, and she was no longer a threat to society.
I would never trust her! I'd give her life in prison for what she did.
I do think she was lucky to get off so easily, but I also understand how difficult it must have been for her to see her two sons suffer so horribly and giving her a life sentence would serve no purpose, imo. Huntingtons is one of the most horrible neurological diseases I've ever seen anyone suffer from, although over the years I spent as a home health nurse, I only had one patient with this disease. His wife was his caretake and she was having a very difficult time trying to provide care.
And I think that's a major reason for killing the disabled--they're seen as a burden. So if any compassion is involved in this killing, it is compassion for the killer rather than the victim.
Most people don't kill their loved ones due to their suffering in such a horrible way, so I don't find your anecdotal examples as related to legal assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia as it's also called. In fact, sadly, someone with Huntington's wouldn't have the option of assisted suicide under the current US laws because it would be difficult to predict that they have less than 6 months left to live, if you can call that living in any meaningful way, and they may not be cognitively intact enough to be approved for help.
Let's let them decide if their lives are meaningful.
I just wanted to give you an example of someone who could no longer watch the suffering of their loved ones, so they killed them, in exchange for a prison term. It's rare that someone has the courage to even do that. Yes. I think it takes courage to be willing to give up your own freedom because you want to end the suffering of someone you love.
As far as I know, the only time anybody sees murder as compassionate or courageous is when the murder victim is disabled.
Anyway....I'll probably bow out of this thread, as we are getting nowhere.
No you won't.
You aren't going to change your mind, regardless of the evidence provided to you that hastening death in cases where the end of life is near, and the person is experiencing intense suffering is kinder than making them suffer. It should be their choice, not yours or mine.
All I've seen are posts on an internet forum by anonymous people in which assisted death is lauded. I'd be very foolish to believe any of that.
I hope that if I ever need it, I will have someone compassionate enough to give me the option to escape a life that leaves me with intractable suffering. Of course, I'd rather die while I'm still somewhat independent, without much discomfort, wouldn't we all?
When the time comes to die, of course we want to choose to die in the least painful and least frightening way possible. But you assume that assisted death guarantees such an "exit." I think that that is an unwarranted and foolish assumption to make considering the track record of euthanasia and the mentality of those who champion it.