DrZoidberg
Contributor
There's many parallels to how blacks were treated after the Civil War. One shouldn't compare degrees of mysery. But both are very sad
The analogy Loren tries to make between the plight of Africans in the American South and the destruction in Gaza by Israel, citing dislike from neighbors as a common thread, does not hold up. This comparison lacks depth, especially when considering that the United States has never established a separate state for African Americans based on divine command, and the arrival of Africans in America was not a matter of voluntary migration, particularly to the southern states.
Moreover, the resilience and hope for equal treatment under the law demonstrated by many enslaved Africans, despite the absence of any promising signs, showcases a history of perseverance and heroism. This narrative is filled with instances of African American heroes who fought for justice and equality, contrasting sharply with Loren's argument. The historical absence of widespread violent retaliation by enslaved Africans against their oppressors to safeguard themselves from hostile neighbors further undermines the comparison's validity.
Liberia? If you read up on the establishment of Israel, they were first gunning for Uganda. While Israel held historical significance, Herzl and the other Zionists were at the core pragmatic. They never expected Israel to become available for Jews.
His name escapes me, but the British general in control over Palestine at the end of WW1 was an evangelical Christian who believed Jesus would return if all Jews returned "home" to Israel. He was instrumental in twisting the arm of the British government to create a Jewish homeland. At that point Jews could get paid to go there. And many did. And once ot was established the Zionists dropped the Uganda idea and went to Israel.
The point of this story is that Zionists don’t seem to have been motivated so much by divine right. As just trying to survive