Back on topic, I’m honestly trying to understand how Hamas managed to secure the bodies of the hostages for nearly two years amid constant bombardment. Were they able to move them each time they relocated, or did they have a location that somehow stayed protected the whole time? Gaza’s so densely monitored it’s hard to picture how that could go undetected for so long. The reason I ask is because part of the deal involves returning all the hostages, dead or alive , and given Hamas’s history, it’s hard to see why they’d prioritize safeguarding remains. Maybe Israel already knew where the hostages were and chose to strike anything deemed militant in hopes of pressuring Hamas to release them.
Reports are saying Hamas still hasn’t turned over all the hostages, maybe they’re scrambling to find remains they left behind somewhere along the way.
Despite islam, not because of islam.
You sure like rewriting history. You do realize that without 7th-century Islam, the violent tribal society it emerged from would’ve
never given rise to the mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and philosophy that shaped civilization itself.
It was
because of Islam, bruh, not in spite of it. Don’t let your hatred for the violent, reactionary and
modern version of the faith erase the history that made your modern world possible.
Does Tswizzle actually value those things, or are they too "Woke"? Usually Republicans are trying to kill philosophy programs, not enroll in them.
Yeah, judging from his "contributions" here on climate change, it seems that TSwizzle is not a fan of science, and if we can credit Islam for its develpment, that is a strike
against Islam in his eyes.
Hi bilby. Please pardon the OT intrusion.
I got your name from someone who used to post here, and who asked me something about one of your previous interactions. I swear I am not trying to troll, annoy you or give you a headache, but I think you could do everyone elsewhere a favour. Pleae consider this question and I’ll fill you in on some details once you answer it. It is not a trick, trap, or in bad faith. I’m an atheist poster on another forum where ai go by this name.
I personally oppose a “right to die”. I would not vote for instituting such a right, although I think I’m familiar with the topic, and my stance comes from a view if what a “ right”is: I think its a universal obligation adopted by consensus, not a thing in and of itself. I know you are in favour of some sort of right to die. If you thought I was standing in the way of your right to die, would you drive right over me?
No, This is not some sort of trap at all. I will explain once you answer, tho it is tedious.