marc
Veteran Member
One GOP congressman has a very good question. A question everyone should consider when voting for congress
One GOP congressman has a very good question. A question everyone should consider when voting for congress
One GOP congressman has a very good question. A question everyone should consider when voting for congress
Hear, hear.
The CR provides funding through January 19, 2024, for agencies and programs that were funded in the following four FY2023 appropriations acts:
For most other federal agencies and programs, the CR provides funding through February 2, 2024.
- the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023;
- the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023;
- the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023; and
- the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023.
Someone once wanted more than censuring:The House voted to advance a GOP-led resolution on Wednesday to censure Democratic Rep. Jamaal Bowman of New York for triggering a fire alarm in a House office building when there was not an emergency. A final vote on whether to pass the censure resolution is expected to take place Thursday.
Bowman was caught on tape pulling a fire alarm in the Cannon House Office Building in late September, shortly before the House was scheduled to vote on a government funding bill. The building was subsequently evacuated.
The congressman said following the incident that it had been an accident.
“I was trying to get to a door. I thought the alarm would open the door, and I pulled the fire alarm to open the door by accident,” Bowman said at the time, adding: “I was just trying to get to my vote and the door that’s usually open wasn’t open, it was closed.”
“I want to thank Democratic leadership and my countless other colleagues for standing up for me last night during the debate,” said Congressman Bowman. “Your words were so kind and I am always grateful to have you all by my side.
“I have expressed deep regret, apologized for my mistake, and taken accountability for my actions. I also went through the proper investigative processes with the Republican controlled House Committee on Ethics, which decided not to open a formal investigation,” he added in a statement. “I had hoped that we could devote our time and resources to doing our jobs and addressing the issues Americans care about."
“Americans desperately need us to act with urgency to address the high costs of healthcare, prevent gun violence, invest in education, and so much more, but my colleagues have made it explicitly clear that they would rather re-litigate already settled matters than do what we were sent here to do and legislate,” Bowman said. “This Republican House is unserious and unproductive, and I know that their efforts to target me are a testament to the importance of my voice in pushing back against their disingenuous rhetoric and harmful policies. I look forward to continuing to serve the people of New York’s 16th district and the country.”
There are 10 days until the country once again faces the possibility of a government shutdown because Congress failed to fund key agencies serving Americans.
Funding for agriculture, energy and water, military construction and veterans affairs, transportation and housing programs will expire on Jan. 19. The rest of the government’s funding expires on Feb. 2.
...
Setting an overall funding level is the first step to keeping the government open, but lawmakers will still have to agree on funding levels for each of twelve appropriations bills, work out policy disagreements and dodge political infighting if they hope to avoid a shutdown.
Passing full spending bills in Congress' timeframe will be tough. So much so that multiple members are asking to push the deadline once again.
OFFICIAL: @SpeakerJohnson's leadership lost a rule vote on the floor.
12 conservatives voted against the procedural measure, as a protest against Johnson's spending deal with @SenSchumer.
Vote was 203-216
The House, once again, is proving to be ungovernable.
Better yet would be proportional representation.The incentives are all fucked up thanks to winner-take-all elections and single-member districts exploitable by gerrymandering. Actually governing is seen as a sign of weakness to the extremists voting in closed primaries where getting a plurality wins.
State by state, we desperately need election reforms like Final Five nonpartisan primaries and ranked-choice general elections.
Another two months.The stopgap measure, which congressional leaders are expected to release Sunday, would extend funding until March 1 for the agencies potentially hit later this week. The deal would give lawmakers until March 8 to fund other agencies and services, according to multiple reports.
Again?Johnson on Friday announced he wasn’t backing out of that deal, despite calls from ultraconservative lawmakers to make deeper spending cuts. The uproar came after a handful of conservative House Republicans voted last year to oust McCarthy from the speakership as he worked with Democrats to avoid a government shutdown.
Some of those right-wing lawmakers last week mulled introducing a motion to vacate, which would tee up a vote to oust Johnson, though others indicated the lawmakers weren't willing to take that step yet.
“In my meeting with him yesterday and many other members of Congress, I let Speaker Johnson know that in no way shape and form will I support any type of [continuing resolution.],” Greene told former White House adviser Steve Bannon in an interview.
“I told him yesterday in his office that I would vacate the chair that that is absolutely unacceptable,” she added. “And we actually have the power of the first, we’re the ones that are in control and we need to control the negotiation. I reiterated those same points this morning so the ball is in his court.”
He is not alone.“Just like I told McCarthy: Talk to Hakeem, and there are some of us that can support you,” said Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), referring to former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who was booted from his leadership post last year at the hands of disgruntled conservatives.
“I’ll say the same thing [to Johnson].”
“He would have to be more willing than Kevin McCarthy was to sit down with Hakeem Jeffries and have a conversation about what it would take for us to be helpful. Kevin said to pound sand. He didn’t want the help,” said Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Mich.).
“We wouldn’t be offering it as an act of charity,” Kildee continued. “We would say, ‘Look, if you need Democrats to govern, then you’re going to have to take Democratic input.’”
House Freedom Caucus on government funding bill: ‘This is what surrender looks like’ | The HillCongressional leaders reached a deal that could avoid a government shutdown for some agencies on this Friday, January 19, and avoid a shutdown for others on February 2. Now, Congress will race against the clock to get the legislation passed.
The deal, which was announced by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), funds the government through March 1 for agencies facing a January 19 deadline, and March 8 for agencies facing a February 2 deadline.
Interesting, because everyone always complains about “legislation from the bench”.Off topic, but I did not want to start another thread.
This could be worse than a shut down.Scholar explains implications of SCOTUS revisiting ‘Chevron deference’— Harvard Gazette
Law School’s Jody Freeman pinpoints key question: “Who decides when laws aren’t clear — courts or agencies?”news.harvard.edu
If I remember correctly, the folks who spend most of their time complaining about "legislation from the bench" and "activist judges" are most often Republicans. Yet to bring it around to the original topic, the far right of the GOP in the House is currently losing their collective minds over the fact that their far right choice to be Speaker has cut a deal with Democrats to keep the government running for a few months.Interesting, because everyone always complains about “legislation from the bench”.Off topic, but I did not want to start another thread.
This could be worse than a shut down.Scholar explains implications of SCOTUS revisiting ‘Chevron deference’— Harvard Gazette
Law School’s Jody Freeman pinpoints key question: “Who decides when laws aren’t clear — courts or agencies?”news.harvard.edu