I am saying that all homosexuality is people changing the hormones inside their body.
How?
What is the mechanism by which such a person changes the hormones in their body?
You seem to think that a teen or even pre-teen can just wake up one morning, decide "I want to be sexually attracted to a person of the same gender" and next thing you know, their hormones have realigned and that's who they are.
Wow. Can we all do that? How? I mean, if I had such instant control over the hormones in my body, I'd straight away (no pun intended) tell my hormones to stop eating so much, become a big fan of exercise, and ditch this lingering addiction to alcohol.
How - exactly - do you figure people just suddenly decide to switch hormones (or even DNA) on and off like a switch? Because I'd really like to know.
It's the chemicals in the water turning the frogs gay dontcha know?
To be fair, Buzz seems to think that one can change their hormones by simply desiring to be one of the letters...L, G, B, T, Q and even a mathematical symbol (+), but let's game this out and say that Alex Jones is right and it's the chemical in the water that makes frogs gay.
If scientists could isolate this chemical (which we're led to believe they already have since it's in the water down by the creek), then it follows that they could use it to engineer a "cure" of sorts. Right? I mean, I just got my flu shot the other day, which is essentially a nerfed version of the flu bug launched into my body so that it can learn to fight it off, so ergo...injecting a little bit of this gay frog water into a virile enough human would trigger a response by the totally straight human body and it would reject the "gay" right away. Sure, you'd have to have an "anti-gay" booster every year, but surely science would be able to synthesize an anti-gay vaccine in short order. Problem solved!
Now...if only Republicans believed in science...
So, I'm going to go into a bit of a rabbit hole of personal experience here.
The thing is that, I think it would be biologically possible, or at least neurologically so, to understand the statements being made in someone's head as to identity.
We already have machines that can decode stream of thought from activation patterns, so it's not unreasonable to infer decoding those, and understanding what of the thing makes it say the thing it does.
This is the darker consequence of creating a sensible english translation for some neural machine language. I think that very soon, it will be possible to avoid, or create, or any such thing a "gay" person, or a eunuch, or a cishet male, and this will come from the advancement of such theories of mind as I often present.
The darkness, though, is that much of the true brilliance that we see in the world has been advanced by LGBT people and I don't think that's any kind of accident. LGBT people are living automatic examples of things falling outside the imaginary lines, of messiness and
color. This "Gray Duck" effect is a huge part of what makes the Turings of this world see the nuance of it.
The world would be poorer for the people who would otherwise be childless and interested in the creative arts and/or the natural world being forced to exist in ways they hate, creating children they did not want to rip into existence... And all for the sake of being little more than
livestock for wealthy fascists.
I think that without folks like me, the world rots and evil wins because the thought processes that lead us out of the cave would be lost, unable to rise for being smothered in the crib.
The human mind should always be born first unmodified and unplanned, to have as much chosen about itself by that which it is without explicit outside selection, excepting those situations which medically translate to "dead before the age of 21", and this because there is variance that is likely important and not well understood... Like the comorbidity of creative and innovative thought with having an LGBTQ+ identity.